User talk:Blacklake

Welcome!

Hello, Blacklake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tarutino

No, I don't. Probably Tarle does. You may also ask Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Napoleonic Era task force. Cheers, Ghirla ^-трёп- 14:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Kenmore is willing to supply the missing information. He would like to work with you on 1812-related articles. I received an e-mail from him, which I would like to forward. Please activate your e-mail account and check your post, or e-mail myself. Kenmore's e-mail address is here. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 05:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 10 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Tarutino, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On 15 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Klyastitsy, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On 17 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Judicial reform of Alexander II , which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On 19 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Orlov trotter, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hello Blacklake!

I am Kenmore. I like your descriptions of the battles of Tarutino, Klyastnitsy, and others. Fine work indeed.

The Russians certainly won many splendid victories in 1812 against the French. Napoleon was defeated by the Russians and forced to retreat. Not many people in the West are aware of the truth behind Napoleon's defeat: that the Russians defeated him in a war of attrition, then they defeated him in combat.

Send me a message anytime if you'd like to cooperate. I am American, and in the future I will need someone to interpret some Russian sources for me, such as Bogdanovich.

Best Regards, Kenmore 19:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)kenmore[reply]

Can you upload this map of Krasnoi onto Wikipedia Commons?

I am unable to upload this map for some reason...can you do it for me? It shows the Russian ring of troops closing in on the defeated French on Nov. 17th...I want to make it part of my Krasnoi article.

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/library/specialcollections/images/treasure_2003_02.gif

Here's the URL of the website where I found it: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/library/specialcollections/treasure_2003_02.php

Thanks!

Kenmore 02:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)kenmore[reply]

Sergei Petrovich Trubetskoy

I have deleted the article as you requested. In future, if you want to change the name of an article, just hit the "move" (between the "history" and "unwatch") and enter the new name of the article. Disclaimer:if you think the move may be controversial, discuss it first. Happy editing abakharev 23:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before it's to late

I, abakharev, award this "Exceptional newcomer" butterfly, in recognition of your excellent articles on Russian History. We need more of them. abakharev 11:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dyk

On 5 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ivan Kalyayev, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sergeev

I have reworded and cleaned the article. I do not believe it is a copyvio now, more like a stub abakharev 06:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:KrasnoiBattle.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:KrasnoiBattle.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:BauhausBand.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BauhausBand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 15:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to take it up at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 November 7#Image:BauhausBand.jpg. —Chowbok ☠ 15:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chowbok RfC

I have begun RfC procedures for User:Chowbok. Since you've had previous disputes with him about image uploads, maybe you'd like to add your commentary? [1] TheQuandry 03:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Void_of_Silence.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Void_of_Silence.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 17:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Void of Silence

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Void of Silence, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Void of Silence seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Void of Silence, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 14:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:InquisitionColombiaLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:InquisitionColombiaLogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:InquisitionColombiaLogo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:InquisitionColombiaLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alekhine

Thanks for your query - I hope to find time to look that up for you later today, probably this evening. Would you like the Brace quote/page number as well? Regards Brittle heaven (talk) 07:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if there are some more details there, it would be great. I asked about Companion only since I knew that there is some information there and didn't know at all about Brace. --Blacklake (talk) 08:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Bill Wall appears to infer a little more detail from Hooper & Whyld than is actually stated, unless it is described differently in another edition. From H & W - " ... He found time to take a third wife, Nadezda Vasiliev, the widow of a high-ranking Russian Officer, and to commence law studies at the Sorbonne, although he did not gain the doctorate that he claimed."

Hooper, David and Whyld, Kenneth (1984). The Oxford Companion To Chess. Oxford University. p. 6. ISBN 0192175408.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

I only asked if you were interested in Brace because Bill Wall mentions his contradictory stance in the same paragraph as he mentions Hooper & Whyld. From Brace - " ... He moved to Paris in 1921 and became a naturalised French citizen in 1925, the same year that he received a doctorate in law from the Sorbonne."

Brace, Edward R. (1977). An Illustrated Dictionary of Chess. Hamlyn Publishing Group. p. 13. ISBN 1-55521-394-4.

With so many differing opinions, it is certainly difficult to know whether his doctorate was genuine or not. Oddly, I once had a manager who had no doctorate, yet he met up regularly with a bunch of Ph. D. professors from the local University and when they wrote to him, they used to address him as Dr. ... either it was a misunderstanding or he had pretended to be a fellow academic! Brittle heaven (talk) 23:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS query

Could You take a look here, commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Enwiki image? feydey (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Blacklake! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Viktor Sadovnichiy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Image Copyright Status

Hi,

Yes this image is from a website that has gone down. However, since the photographer is unknown, doesn't it fall under PD as the said photo was taken more than 40 years ago ? Do let me know your thoughts. ' Perseus 71 ^talk 01:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a reply on your talk page. --Blacklake (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. In that case go ahead and delete both images please. ' Perseus 71 ^talk 23:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spassky query

A pleasure to help a fellow Gathering fan of course. I only have the 1984 edition where it appears on p.318 - It says ″161, the Leningrad Variation of the Nimzo-indian Defence; 177, line in the King's Indian Defence, known since the game Stoltz-Kashdan, Bled 1931.″

This may need some explanation - the two numbers refer to references in the chart of opening moves given near the end of the book. On this chart, 161 is appended at the start of the Leningrad Var. of the Nimzo, characterized by 3. ... Bb4 4.Bg5. Probably you are familiar. Indeed, Spassky was one of the main exponents of this line and it is often given under his name in English texts. The second use of the term Spassky Variation, 177, is appended at the end of a major line of the Grunfeld Defence - 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Bc4 0-0 8.Ne2 c5. I'm not sure why the authors call this a King's Indian Defence in the Spassky Variation article - I can only imagine that historically all such lines were grouped under King's Indian Defence until the Grunfeld became big in its own right, which may have been after Bled 1931. In the chart, they do acknowledge that the game has become a Grunfeld Def. after 3... d5, so it does not appear to be an error on the author's part, more a question of historical accuracy I think. Brittle heaven (talk) 00:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blacklake. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blacklake. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blacklake. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]