User talk:Blackbrier1

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, Blackbrier1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! dissolve ^talk 19:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lyndsey Rodrigues, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lyndsey Rodrigues was changed by Blackbrier1 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-01T04:38:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 2 Girls 1 Cup. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave6 ^talk 07:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Mara, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. dissolve ^talk 07:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Protection

Hi. Just so you know, adding protection templates to articles (like you did to Colbie Caillat) will not protect them - only administrators can protect pages. -- P.B. Pilhet 01:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Release dates

Please do not change release dates as did in Paper Trail. Per WP:ALBUMS#Released, the earliest release date should be placed in the infobox. There is no priority of one country over another under any circumstance. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 18:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dashboard prophets

A tag has been placed on Dashboard prophets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dashboard prophets

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dashboard prophets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dashboard prophets. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dashboard Prophets

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dashboard Prophets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dashboard Prophets. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Alison Rosen Photo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Alison Rosen Photo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image issue with File:Alison Rosen Photo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Alison Rosen Photo.jpg because it lacks evidence of permission. The image is copied from http://www.alisonrosen.com, which staes that the image is "all rights reserved". It is sourced to this website and the subject of the image, Alison Rosen, and while a {{GFDL}} tag has been applied, there is no proof on the source website that the author agreed to license the file under the given license.

If you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then please do one of the following:

If you are the photographer please change the licensing information on the http://www.alisonrosen.com source page.
If you are the photographer please send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Alison Rosen Photo.jpg, without supplying the needed information. Be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the image meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the images information page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the image does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thanks you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Lil-wayne-rebirth.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lil-wayne-rebirth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 02:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigweezyfan1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lil-wayne-rebirth.jpg

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Lil-wayne-rebirth.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alison Rosen

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alison Rosen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Rosen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alison Rosen

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alison Rosen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Rosen (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alexandra Dreyfus

An editor has nominated Alexandra Dreyfus, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Dreyfus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]