User talk:Black Flag

Hope that you check this. You are conscientious and should open an account. Thanks for the positive input. As you apparently do, I care both about the article and the subject. I was all behind the idea of "heritage not hate", but I'm not down with an attempt to revive the White Citizens Council. Rlquall 01:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!.--Black Flag 07:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stop dumping trivia

Please stop dumping legal trivia in serious articles. You need to have a perspective about the Civil War and about Wiki as a serious encyclopedia. The article in question is about NAMING the war and none of your additions relate directly to that point. Rjensen 17:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I have sent Rjensen a very polite WP:3RR notice, which I'm sure he will add to the nice collection he seems to be building:

User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 11:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 13:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 21:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block imposed on Rjensen -- 05:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Black Flag 18:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review of new ACW-related articles

First of all, I thank you for the time and effort you have taken to create and maintain the very helpful and user-friendly pages on found on your “Hlj subpages.” Secondly, I thank you for your friendly comments today.

Is it your preference that Wikipedia contributors notify you on occasions when they have created/submitted new ACW-related articles?

Very Best Regards --Black Flag 01:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I always enjoy hearing about new articles, although I almost always find them when someone starts linking to them in the 1,400 or so articles in my watchlist. If you have something you want to point out to me, go ahead. You might consider joining the WP:ACW task force and telling them as an alternative. If you have any questions or discussion about ACW topics, you can also send me emails through my user page. Hal Jespersen 15:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for neutral party

I have asked Jerseyko and Rlquall to take a look at the article titled "Neo-confederate". I have listed some of my objections to this article on the Talk page of the article. Your help is also welcomed. Thanks! --Fix Bayonets! 08:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will defend Confederate ancestors!

Take a look at this userbox.--Fix Bayonets! 02:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm down

Take a look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes please. Arbitration and mediation threats are not going to help, especially when steps in our dispute resolution process would thereby be skipped. Will you please comment on talk as to exactly what you think the problem is with the section? · j e r s y k o talk · 18:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding SCV factionalization

Since I quoted you regarding this issue, I think I should let you know I did. (In the discussion, when I am referencing "YOUR OWN WORDS," the term "YOUR" does not mean you {Black Flag} personally, but other editors. In the specific instance in which I did quote you, I provided a clear reference). Thanks! --Fix Bayonets! 05:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Will Beback had the courtesy to move this section into a draft page, so that we could discuss and re-edit. I object to your mulish and aggravated refusal to cooperate with these efforts, and consider same to be a violation of Wikipedia good faith policies. --Black Flag 21:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

Will moved the subsection before the RFC responses started rolling in. There is clear support for the inclusion of a subsection on the factionalization in the article, as multiple third parties have said that they consider the original subsection to be neutral. I'm still waiting for those "opposing" sources. · j e r s y k o talk · 21:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on the section this week end or earlier, time permitting.--Black Flag 22:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming the Civil War

You have recently edited Naming the American Civil War. I am stepping back from the article for a day or so to avoid an edit war. My request is that you consider stepping in to apply some peer pressure in the interest of civility, NPOV, assuming good faith, etc. It's up to you. -- Alarob 00:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked Fix Bayonets! for evidence to back up the objections you and he expressed to demoting the War for State's Rights section. I hope you understand I'm not out to delete the term. I just can't find evidence that it has the standing of the other terms we have placed in subsections. F.B.! and I are talking on my talk page. I wouldn't mind if you joined in. -- Alarob 03:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exceptional

If the claims are exceptional, of course the guideline applies. But the question is whether the claims are exceptional at all. · j e r s y k o talk · 19:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

. . . and you need to read the Rfc rules, which say "Do not continue the debate here" and use the date stamp only, NO signatures. I added a link to the RS#Exceptional claims to the description. · j e r s y k o talk · 19:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you honestly believe I've violated a policy or guideline, I suggest you report my behavior. · j e r s y k o talk · 20:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome!

Remember, they said they were "neutral" ;-) hahahaha
...just your average red-flag-waving, Marx-quoting, "neutral" editor. --Fix Bayonets! 21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Williams quote at SCV page

I am requesting that someone initiate an RFC on this issue. I ask that the RFC be asked in a neutral manner. The quote has been removed by Will Bebeck. I don't know whether that matters or not.--Fix Bayonets! 23:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Help

I have been falsly reported and accused here by User:Jersyko, because of these edits at the SCV page. If you feel that Jersyko's accusations are erroneous, I would appreciate your comment here.--Fix Bayonets! 22:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User conduct rfc

I invite you to comment on User:Fix Bayonets! user conduct rfc, which I started today. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fix Bayonets!. Thanks for any input you have. · j e r s y k o talk · 05:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello, Black Flag. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello, Black Flag. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag/Userboxes/. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello Black Flag, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello Black Flag, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag/Userboxes/. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello Black Flag, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg

Hello Black Flag, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Fedsoc logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Black Flag/Userboxes/. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God

There is no god Black Flag. Creamy3 (talk) 20:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita.

Text 123

They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas.

Text 124

These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava".

Text 125

Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished.

Text 126

Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening.

Text 127

By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava.

Text 128

No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava.

Text 129

Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava.

Text 130

One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down.

Text 131

Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone.

Text 132

Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish.

Text 133

Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise.

Text 134

Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself.

Text 135

By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas.

Text 136

By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu.

Text 137

Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories

Text 138

I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants.

Text 139

A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya.

Text 140

Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life.

Text 141

Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew.

Text 142

Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha!

Text 143

O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy?

Text 144

Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life.

Text 145

Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place?

Text 146

Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart.

Text 147

I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts.

Text 148

The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.82.156 (talk) 14:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]