User talk:Bjrobinson/Archive1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello Bjrobinson/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Punkmorten 12:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ah four ~ okay thanks. Bjrobinson 12:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's not meant as criticism, it's a standardized message ({{welcome}}) we give to new users :) Punkmorten 14:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Transit

Glad to hear you're also interested in working on the rapid transit article. I'd say we should figure out what actually counts as "notable" (off the top of my head, the world's first subway system, first to run electric vehicles, most riders per day, stuff like that) and put everything in chronological order. That might actually entail a full rewrite. The most important thing, I'd say, is sources. I don't have much experience with the citation format on Wikipedia, but I plan on looking up the proper way to do it and trying to find some good sources to use while editing the history section. Not sure exactly when I'll be able to get this done (maybe this weekend) but yeah, that's my plan of attack. Foxmulder 19:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help wanted with Town and Country Planning in the United Kingdom

Hi, I've recently been expanding Town and country planning in the United Kingdom quite a bit and have started a subcategory called [:Category:United Kingdom planning law]. I've really written up a bit of a skeleton for this area of planning. The planning acts, the new planning structure, PPS's, all those bloody new abbreviations LDF,LDD,RSS etc.etc. So far the majority of it are stubs and I was wondering if you might be interested in lending a hand in some way. Most of the articles so far are pretty dry statements of fact(I think) and could do with some context, structure/re-structure, debate, proof reading etc.etc. I'm a complete novice at Wikipedia and sure there's a heap of no-no's I've committed (Posting direct to talk pages?!?). Please let me know if your interested or not. Many thanks Russ --Mcginnly 14:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NrGorge.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:NrGorge.jpeg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, i made it very clear that I had permission to upload form the creator, your pettiness makes me mad >:( Bjrobinson 11:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures in the main Milton Keynes article

It is really good to have a town planning expert coming in to look at and improve the Milton Keynes article, but I'm afraid I have a problem with the pics you addded - more precisely, where you put them. These are good pics, but they are really in the wrong place, because they don't help to clarify the text in the adjacent paragraph. The fountain in (not near) the centre doesn't really say anything about the urban design process; Midsummer Boulevard is not a grid road. They are fine for the Central Milton Keynes article, so I'll move them there. If you disagree, drop me a note at user talk:Concrete Cowboy to say why.

Please don't let this discourage you from improving the text. It still contains a fair amount of opinion that could to with being based on accepted sources. Better still, if you can find or make copyright-free pictures (including drawings) that would illustrate the adjacent text, that would be great. --Concrete Cowboy 09:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback appreciated! See my response on CC's page Bjrobinson

I'll repost them in the Central Milton Keynes article, which is better. If you are taking pics again, that's great, but try for something that illustrates the what the text is saying. --Concrete Cowboy 23:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello Ben, glad to see you are also alive and well, hope life is treating you well. Looks like you have figgered out how to make user boxes :-) If you are ever in Manchester (were me and Kim are living) give us a shout.--JK the unwise 07:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture Wikiproject

Hi, many thanks for all your architecture and planning edits. I was wondering if you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture. It's currently the umbrella project for issues relating to planning (All though there is talk of establishing a unique planning wikiproject). Also we've been revamping the Architecture Portal and nominations to Portal:Architecture/Selected picture candidates and Portal:Architecture/Selected article candidates will always be welcome. --Mcginnly 10:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! I'll help wherever i can! Bjrobinson 23:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National Playing Fields Association

Just thought you might like to see how, with the help of the NPFA, the page has grown since your initial creation. I'm sure there is still far more to do. Fiddle Faddle 20:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Town and country planning in the united kingdom

Thanks for your thanks. We need to recategorise the articles into the 3 categories which will be - UK planning law, UK planning policy, UK planning interested parties. By the way - we've recently started the wikiproject - Wikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planning if you'd like to join or know anyone who does we need the numbers.--Mcginnly 00:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planning stub

I've also proposed a stub called {{planning-stub}}.You can support it's creation here - Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2006/June#.7B.7Bplanning-stub.7D.7D_.2F_Category:Urban_studies_and_planning. --Mcginnly 09:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planning portal and wikiproject

We've started a wikiproject for planning at Wikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planning and were wondering if you'd like to sign up, there's plenty of work to do to get planning issues up to par on wikipedia and it seems like a good idea to establish a community of wikipedians to tackle it. We've also requested a Planning:Portal, if you like you can leave your comments here Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals. --Mcginnly 08:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: New page, wrong name!

Hi. Renaming a page is a fairly simple process. All you need to do is click on the move tab at the top and follow the instructions on the next screen. For more information about the process, see Help:Moving a page. Hope that answers your question. - EurekaLott 01:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cnlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cnlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mass traisnt

Thanks for the kind comments. barnstars are the norm when it comes to awards. Cheers, — Selmo ^(talk) 22:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Renewal

I see you were interested in Urban Renewal earlier. You wmight like to see my message about trying a restructure there on the talk page

Uneirlys 21:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MMOs

Browser games and MMOs are not what I want to deal with... convos relating to them are archived here.

Barnstar

I detested geography at school, and am a bit surprised to be told that I've been doing it. Still, "Too kind, too kind", as the lady said. William Avery 18:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SOHWitness.jpg

Hello Bjrobinson, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:SOHWitness.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bjrobinson. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]