Jump to content

User talk:Bjelleklang/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please note that this is an archive of previous posts at my talkpage. Please do not edit these! Bjelleklang - talk 11:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]


User:No More Mr Nice Guy

[edit]

Yes it's User:No More Mr Nice Guy. If he was deleted, then why is he still able to edit/undo/...??? I cannot talk to him nor warn him because his talk page is inactive! I checked his old talk page and I saw he was warned several times and had been engaged in active edit wars! 173.45.200.99 (talk) 06:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi! The user wasn't deleted, only his userpage. As User:Patchy1 says above, users can't be deleted; but user pages can be (as they are nothing more than articles). The user still exists and is active. Bjelleklang - talk 07:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Since I cannot talk to him (posting on his page), how can I warn him before asking to block him? 173.45.200.99 (talk) 05:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no comment

[edit]

We were informed you have canceled the page about A.G. but he is writing a thesis on Downhill and A.G is the most representing figure for DH in Italy, X-games, etc. inform and repristinate it, for the peace of the guy making the university degree — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.42.219.250 (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


StillStanding-247

[edit]

I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously didn't do much research then, you certainly didn't look at the lies and false accusations of sockpuppetry constantly thrown at StillStanding by the POV group he was running into; you didn't look into the harassment he received, the constant threats and promises of a campaign to have him blocked.

You can accuse me of assuming bad faith if you want, but he had editors talking about him in veiled terms like "our mutual friend", talking about strategies to get him blocked, talking about having him blocked for creating a draft RfC page, and who actively went to have others blocked for trying to research diffs for that same page. There was no "good faith" involved in this, there was a pattern of bad-faith edits by a battleground-mentality POV group who happened to find a set of sympathetic admins to their cause.

It's sad to see you are as corrupt as every other wikipedia admin. They are all either actively in bad faith or playing the "I see nothing" game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.232.109 (talk) 13:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StillStanding-247&oldid=516333723#The_morning_after.
It's obvious you didn't do the slightest bit of reading or real investigation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.232.109 (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that way. You obviously didn't do much research then, you certainly didn't look at the lies and false accusations of sockpuppetry constantly thrown at StillStanding by the POV group he was running into; you didn't look into the harassment he received, the constant threats and promises of a campaign to have him blocked.
I saw the accusations, and I also saw the constant POV-pushing, some personal attacks, and also a very one-sided analysis of what happened in the exact link; he does not in any way appear to acknowledge that he might have had a part in what happened. As for It's obvious you didn't do the slightest bit of reading or real investigation; you're wrong. I did quite a bit of reading, although not of absolutely every edit StillStanding did, I just don't happen to agree with you. I had nothing to do with this before you asked me to have a look, and after looking at a bunch of edits and page histories I happen to end up with another conclusion. And if disagreeing with you means I'm corrupt, I really don't see how it's possible to have a constructive debate of anything. Bjelleklang - talk 21:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And if disagreeing with you means I'm corrupt, I really don't see how it's possible to have a constructive debate of anything. You're obviously not willing to look at anything the other side did. StillStanding's conduct wasn't perfect, but the behavior of those on the other side - who received no sanction at all - was simply ridiculous and amounted to full-on, concerted wikistalking for a period of weeks. If you can't acknowledge when behavior that bad crosses the line, you don't deserve to be an administrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.232.109 (talk) 22:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Resubmit Page for Approval

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang.

If this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Francois_Campos) article has been accepted, how come it says that there are multiple issues?

How can I get rid of these notifications?

Thank you.

Tclim11 (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Resubmit Page for Approval

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang

Thank you for your explanation.

There are two wikipedia articles that link to this one, so is it still an orphan? http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agence_VU http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prix_HSBC_pour_la_photographie

Also, how can I ask someone to review the article and have them remove the notices?

Thank you again! 67.243.7.208 (talk) 16:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K-Bust

[edit]

Hi my article is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/K-Bust I'm sending you this message to please reconsider my article, according to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V#Non-English_sources, unfortunately I don't have english references by now, but the sources I am citing on this article are well known and comply with wikipedia requirements.

Best regards Dijooe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dijooe (talk • contribs) 19:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong place I'm afraid. Talked to user on IRC to give directions. Bjelleklang - talk 19:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RTE

[edit]

I could not see any reference to that weird claim about a theater play, where you reverted Inspector, at the provided source (No 4 in article). Could you tell me where it is? Best. --E4024 (talk) 22:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shelter Cymru

[edit]

Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article. After doing a news archive search I believe they are notable.

Thank you. Rotten regard Softnow 00:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not say, of course. It is the "Makomya" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspectortr (talk • contribs) 21:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Resubmit Page for Approval

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang Thank you for your explanation. There are more than two wikipedia articles that link to this one, so is it still an orphan? http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agence_VU http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prix_HSBC_pour_la_photographie etc... The citations have been revised. How can I have someone review the article and remove the notices? Thank you again Tclim11 (talk) 03:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vormedal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aksnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the DePaul University Department of Management page

[edit]

Thanks for the response. As mentioned in my earlier response, the links on the page are relevant to support the information on the wiki page. I am unable to understand why is this not legitimate. There are other pages like for College Of Commuting and Digital Media has all links to the respective official website page. Additionally, I am working on drafting the History section but I would request for the approval of the current content.

Thanks.

Getmba (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DePaul University Department of Management

[edit]

Hello,

I took a look at a few similar pages on Wikipedia and Wikipedia's description to understand notability and in-depth references. Based on this understanding, I have a added a few more references for the page. I request you to have a look and provide the acceptance.

Thanks.

Getmba (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

As per my understanding, the points regarding rankings mentioned on the page need external notability. I verified the existing links and updated 1 link and have updated some text. Kindly have a look and let me know your view. Also, if further changes are required with regards to the notability, may I request you to mention the links that are inappropriate. This will help me understand the required change better.

Thanks. Getmba (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for the clarification. Based on it, here is what I found out:

Regarding point 3, the Driehaus College of Business contains both the Kellstadt Graduate School of Business and the Undergraduate School of Business, which is not named yet. All of the specific departments (Management, Marketing, etc.) are part of the Driehaus College of Business and teach classes at both the graduate (Kellstadt) and undergraduate levels.

Regarding point 4, the links have updated the Entrepreneur and Princeton review rankings to the pages which explain the basis on which rankings are done. I hope this is what is required for detailed references.

Please let me know your view. Thank you!.

Getmba (talk) 19:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Barnstar for You!

[edit]
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar

Congratulations, Bjelleklang! You're receiving a brownie because you reviewed 16 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoke to you in Wiki chat

[edit]

Please review the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Truthseekr67/Stan_Bharti

If there is anything I can do to improve it, please do let me know.

Thanks mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthseekr67 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang,

  • Hi! It looks like you've broken a few templates...

Thanks for the heads-up. I think (= hope) all is back in order again now. Unfortunately, I was distracted and forgot to complete some testing. Apologies! CsDix (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lulubelle III

[edit]

Hi I'm a bit bit confused about the refusal on the grounds of notability. The band have had repeated airplay on BBC national radio, the BBC guidelines for wikipedia articles say this is sufficient for notability, these plays have been referenced in the article. They have also been played on national Irish radio, last year and also last week. Can you give me some pointers on what is not notable?

--Musicfan1812 (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding My AfS

[edit]

Thank you for your advice to increase notability in "Snoopy and the Red Baron". It is much appreciated.MgWd (talk) 13:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)MgWd[reply]

AFC question

[edit]

First, I would like to thank you for approving and moving the Revenge of the Mummy article User:Ihafez and User:Themeparkgc created to live use. Second, I would like to ask why you posted on my talk page that the article was not accepted? Is it just because there isn't a template for acceptances? Or should I add something more? Thanks, ihafez talk 16:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding SoccerStarz page

[edit]

In reply to your decline of the SoccerStarz wiki pgae. I find it amazing that the page can be declined for the reasons that you give and yet another similar product called 'Match Attax' has its very own page with no problem whatsoever. Also there are hardly any references on that page and yet it has been cleared. This is one of the main problems I have with wikipedia, there is just no consistency to the decisions that are made and it is such a battle for a user to upload a new page nowadays. There seems to be this obsession with references, but references should only really be required for matters of fact or to support a statement. Not every single line of an article requires a reference. This is my honest opinion of the situation, its never made clear what the problems are.

There are so many other pages relating to products that are structured like this though and yet they are accepted. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, why does it have to be notable? Surely just has to be reliable. Plus I was hoping that once it was accepted, other contributors could help me build up the page as its difficult to create a page all by yourself.

Hi, there. I'm trying to do an article page fopr an artist called Geoffrey Lillemon. I accidentally used the form 'I', I took it out already. What are the steps of getting the the 'speedy deletion' notification off?

many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valtteri.laihanen (talk • contribs) 14:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Lillemon is one of the most groundbreaking artists in the Net Art movement and therefore deserves a wikipedia page and shouldn't be deleted. He has given workshops/presentations in different design conferences and Design schools. He has participated to well-known exhibitions all over the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valtteri.laihanen (talk • contribs) 15:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. I'm adding why he should stay there. It was my mistake since I accidentally used 'I' form, which is not allowed. What are the following procedures in order that we can set up an article page for him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valtteri.laihanen (talk • contribs) 15:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with Stephanie Strickland page

[edit]

Your comments are just what I needed. Thank you again for answering my "help" call. Best regards Juliannechat (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)juliannechat[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

for the barnstar.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Logitech MX Revolution

[edit]

Hi, I noticed you recently deleted all content on the article Logitech MX Revolution, and redirected it to a list. What's the rationale behind this? Shouldn't this first be discussed in the talk page and be candidate for deletion? HuGo_87 (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question described a pretty unique product, since that particular mouse's wheel hasn't been seen on any other mouse AFAIK, as well as acouple of other distinct features. Maybe some of this should be kept in the new page. HuGo_87 (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with the merges, this article did go up for an AfD and a keep was decided upon rather than a merge Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Logitech_MX_revolution. I'm not 100% sure on the policy on it, however I support the merge of all the products. In fact the merge is almost better since it provides a easy to read chart rather than multiple, short articles. Mrfrobinson (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. Like I said I am in support of the merge, looks better, reads better, etc. Just wasn't sure if you were aware of the ancient discussion on it. Mrfrobinson (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SE: stop reverting please

[edit]

On what clause are you reverting this. There has no been any kind of conclusion in WP:DRN . You should wait for the outcome of this process. I am still writing my response.

SE

[edit]

You seem to be feeling strongly about the section. Also I am on seeing you ask for admin intervention. Don't remove it before a conclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yparjis (talk • contribs) 12:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question.

[edit]

Is it allowed for an editor who doesnt like one of my AfDs to try and use my recent block status against me in an AFD discussion? JonnyBonesJones (talk) 08:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

three change requests are on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amy_Courter

it looks a little crazy becuase i did all rhe formatting and reference citing, too, but if you go into "edit" you should be able to cut and paste. Thank you for all of your help getting this fixed and locked down.

Capsfuture (talk) 21:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Gene Ammons and Friends at Montreux

[edit]

I feel that your speedy deletion of the above album article failed to meet the criteria under which you deleted it. Gene Ammons does have an entry (as do all the sidemen) and the album is notable for a number of reasons - the artists last appearance at the Montreux Jazz Festival and one of his last notable live albums (noted in the Allmusic review. I urge you to reconsider this deletion DISEman (talk) 01:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of deleted article

[edit]

Hello, Bjelleklang. A while ago I found that the editing history of the article Aldo Grippaldi started with an edit with an edit summary saying "Undid revision 528824552 by SDPatrolBot", which obviously made no sense. It turned out that you had deleted the article, and then restored just the latest revision, losing its editing history. It took me a bit of time and work to sort it out, as another article had been deleted at one of the names involved, and I had to sort out which edits to restore and history-merge, and which to leave deleted. I assume that restoring only the latest revision was just a slip, as I can't imagine any reason why you would wish to destroy the editing history. However, I thought it best to let you know, so you can avoid making the same mistake again. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

[edit]
Hello, Bjelleklang.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted page for approval : Solidiance

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang,

I have applied the suggested amendments you specified previously on my article submission. Please therefore kindly check it out now and reconsider to approve it - or suggest more tips/clear guidance to help me enhance it in order to acquire an approval. The resubmitted page is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Solidiance

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitaresti Astarini (talk • contribs) 17:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Demetrios James Caraley

[edit]

Hi,

I wanted to find out why you deleted my article on Demetrios James Caraley. I would appreciated any guidance as to what changes I need can make in order for it to be published.

Thank you for your assistance, Valerian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valerian.s (talk • contribs) 14:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

User:Dr Jamal Lasri. JohnInDC (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another: User:Lasri CQE IST. JohnInDC (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Saved you a bit of work with this as well: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jamal.lasri. JohnInDC (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure whether sandboxes matter but in case they do, these have reappeared: User:Jamal.lasri/sandbox, User:Dr Jamal Lasri/sandbox. JohnInDC (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your most recent deletion of his page got me to nosing around, where I found User:Lasri_Jamal. JohnInDC (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And, again: Jamal Lasri Ph.D.. JohnInDC (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

page

[edit]

Hi..I want to create an article of singer Chandrika Bhattacharya. please tell me the exact process. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandrika Bhattacharya (talk • contribs) 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pratap

[edit]

Hi,

I wanted to find out why you deleted my article on Chandrika Bhattacharya. I would appreciated any guidance as to what changes I need can make in order for it to be published.

Thank you for your assistance.

Laravel deletion

[edit]

I don't get it. Why was the page deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karimmaassen (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clear answer! I would love if you could create a sandbox. Together with others, I could try and create a better article on Laravel before proposing it as an actual acrticle. Your idea for putting it on User:Karimmaassen/Laravel would be very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karimmaassen (talk • contribs) 18:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simon de Montfort 2014

[edit]

I addressed the reasons for rejecting my article and am waiting for reconsideration. is that still your domain? Amaury1241 (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simon de Montfort 2014

[edit]

Thanks for the reply. The notability of the project as stated in the article is the 750th anniversary of Montfort's parliaments. We want a central source for people to find out more about this anniversary, which would be developed in the article as the anniversary approaches, and logically thought Wikipedia would be the right venue for it.Amaury1241 (talk) 20:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tripolin deletion

[edit]

Greetings,

Im the owner of Tripolin and all its copyrighted material. In what sense there was a copyright violation?


Thanks, David Rodriguez — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tripolinsuccessalways (talk • contribs) 17:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable faculty and alumni from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka

[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of notable faculty and alumni from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nairaland.com/1005321/university-nigeria-most-recognized-alumni.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 09:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roxx Productions

[edit]

Can I get you to get a copy of the Roxx Productions page you deleted into my sandbox? I'd like to see if I can make the article Wikipedia-worthy. 5minutes (talk) 13:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FABRIZIO SIMONCIONI

[edit]

I don't understand. www.latingrammy.com/nominations is NOT considered a reliable source? and Billboard USA official charts neither? And the whole discography is easely checable online. Just google the name. So could you please explain what exactly means "reliable sources" for Wiki? ThanxSimoncia (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FABRIZIO "Simoncia" SIMONCIONI

[edit]

I am here just to understand, again, sorry.. You wrote "not notable" because recording, mixing and producing records (with more then 48 certified platinum awarded) and a latin grammy nomination for Best Album of The Year (his name APPEARS on the nominee list n the official grammy site, not just the record he did) is not enough for wiki standard. So why collegue as Joe Chiccarelli, Tom Lord Alge, Stephen Short, Andy Wallace, Michael Brauer, Tchad Blake, Chris Coady, John Congleton, Jason Suecof (just to mention a fews, but on wikipedia you can find thousand of them) are approved? And also why wikipedia in Italian and Spanish has approved the article since years with no problems, considering Simoncioni notable? Maybe he could be not notable for you but he for sure is for music related people and artists. Or maybe he is just not notable for the english version of wikipedia. If this is the reason, I can understand, otherwise, sorry, it looks little strange. Also because Simoncioni not only is a worldwide renowed mixer and producer, but also a live musician and former artist with references. He toured in Ligabue's band from 1998 to 2005 in Italy and Europe (including in many TV shows as the MTV music award (refs included). He also appeared on many official artists biography such as Litfiba "PROIBITO" official bio (ISBN 88-85859-96-8) and Ligabue "1190-2004 bio" (ISBN 88-359-5572-6) and LIGABUE SAN SIRO & OLIMPICO photo book (ISBN 88-900976-0-4). All the records listed are on the market so don't need references. I will not insist anymore after this, but I invite you to think about it and revise your judgment upon the article. Thank you.Simoncia (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC) I also added few more references to support the article including ALLMUSIC sources and official video clips from Warner Music where Simoncioni appear as performer.Simoncia (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for your swiftness in acting against MervinVillarreal. I know myself and other editors were at our wits end as to what to do and we really were not keen to get admins to take it up again. But I am sure you would agree he just wasn't listening. MisterShiney ✉ 18:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Account Request

[edit]

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Bjelleklang - talk

I've approved the account, thanks for volunteering.--v/r - TP 20:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Oxford American Magazine

[edit]

After editing and meticulously sourcing the facts (with reputable sources) the article on The Oxford American Magazine, I see that you reverted to a very old version of Wikipedia that contains errors and misinformation and is missing sources. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliusEdward (talk • contribs) 18:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

revisions/sourcing

[edit]

hi, thank you for your reply. i will add footnotes and then ask for your approval, ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliusEdward (talk • contribs) 19:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The edits are not unsourced--I have a reputable source for each line of text. I don't understand how you can just delete sourced information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliusEdward (talk • contribs) 19:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

founders and editors

[edit]

I also don't understand how you can remove facts like the founders and editors of magazines?! JuliusEdward (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline Colors

[edit]

Thanks for the help with the list of colors for band timelines. You sent me to exactly what I was looking for. I had done a lot of searching through the Help pages and was unable to find anything because I was unfamiliar with the term "EasyTimeline." I find that a bit odd as a long-time and frequent WP editor. Perhaps that is an outdated term or it's not publicized enough. In any case, thanks again. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Present Incarnation and founder/editor

[edit]

Hi, I just added the sourced information for the "present incarnation" section and I also added the founder and former editor name to the box with image. Please do not delete factual information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliusEdward (talk • contribs) 20:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Occidental Hotels and Resorts

[edit]

I apologize for writing on your talk page, but I wanted to know the protocol to have my page revised again (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kris.sordo/Hotel) to see if it can now be posted. Thanks. --Kris.sordo (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cut reference

[edit]

Thanks, I just deleted the sentence that you questioned. JuliusEdward (talk) 01:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help Project newsletter : Issue 5

[edit]
The Help Project Newsletter
Issue V - January 2013
Project news summary
From the editor

Hello again from the Help Project!

In the last newsletter (which was quite a while ago sorry!) I talked about my fellowship and the plans for improving the main portal page, Help:Contents. Well I'm sad to say that my fellowship is now over, but very happy to say that the proposed improvements to that page have been completed and implemented. Do check it out if you haven't already.

Another important and frequently used help page, Wikipedia:Contact us, has also seen a significant revamp. You may recognise the design inspiration from the new tutorial pages.

In project news, we now have a subscription to the "article alerts" service. Any deletion nominations, move discussions, or requests for comments on pages within the Help Project's scope will now show up at Wikipedia:Help Project/Article alerts. So that's definitely a page which project members might want to watch.

Any comments or suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter. If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name.

-- the wub "?!" 23:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of Linux Mint

[edit]

Full-protecting the Linux Mint article seems excessive, considering that (1) the IP editor had been blocked for edit-warring, and (2) semi-protection would have achieved the same result. The block for the IP hasn't even expired, so there's no indication that the behavior would continue. My understanding of the protection policy is that the minimum required to stop disruption is preferred, and that's already been done, so is there any particular reason why you felt full-protecting the article was necessary, when the disruption had already been taken care of? - SudoGhost 15:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just wasn't sure if there was something I wasn't aware of, but thanks for clearing that up. - SudoGhost 16:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Craig G

[edit]

Thanks. That's very true and unfortunate. It was a case of unexplained removal which I just reverted without taking a proper look at the content first. I'll try to be more careful nex time. Widr (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is "an HTTP" or "a HTTP" correct?

[edit]

Regarding this edit, I have raised the question at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Is "an HTTP" or "a HTTP" correct? that may interest you. I agree with you on this one, but at least one other editor[1][2] disagrees. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]

Just thought I'd let you know that this exists, given our discussion a few days ago. Your input is appreciated, though of course optional. Cheers, m.o.p 16:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my edit

[edit]

Thanks for catching my link to the disambiguation page instead of the direct link. (It's now fixed.) It was an oversight, and embarrassing in that I correct others' such errors without sending a mail.

One observation - and a question. Neither the Wikipedia general entry for Rhapsody nor the dictionary entry notes that the basic word from the Greek (root rhapt - ) refers to a stitching together - a rhaptis is a tailor - so a rhapsody, whether literary or musical, is a stitching together of themes, often in an unstructured manner.

So how and where, in your opinion, should a contributor insert such additional material?

Alfred Kromholz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kromholz (talk • contribs) 04:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Malevich

[edit]

Hi -- In reference to your recent edit -- you swapped the "White on White" photo on the grounds that the old one was upside down; yet the new one is in the same orientation. I happen to prefer the new one because it demonstrates the artwork more clearly; but just pointing out that if the old one was upside down, the new one is too! Cheers, DoctorJoeE talk to me! 15:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bjelleklang. You have new messages at DoctorJoeE's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikidata weekly summary #46

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 17:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Cleanup

[edit]
Hello, Bjelleklang.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Infastech

[edit]

Hi Chris, you declined my article for creation on Infastech, I have been through multiple iterations and had several attempts to create a solid page deleted. Perhaps you can view some of that history each decline is very contradictory to the others and very frustrating. Infastech is not a household name. There is investor trading news relating to Infastech expected this week, lots of people will be searching to find out who they are and what their affiliation with Stanley Black and Decker is. I tried to create a non-bias article with lots of references and citations, was told to add more and show other published info etc before it was deleted. All I am now trying to do is get the page created with a few base facts on the Stanley buy-out referenced in the article so others can contribute further about the company. Appreciate any help you can and happy for you to consider any one of the previous 4 submissions for Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Infastech. Thanks Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danpils (talk • contribs) 21:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logitech VX Nano

[edit]

Please, show me the rationale behind deletion of Logitech VX Nano page.

Kacperperschke (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #47

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Extended diff view to include references now
    • Fixed bug where incorrect statements revision was shown in diff view
    • Added first version of Linked Data interface (RDF/XML); will be accessible from Special:EntityData
    • Updated the demo system
    • More work towards using Solr for our search
    • More investigation and fixes of search issues
    • Fixed several bugs in the entity selector and improved its behavior
    • Worked on refactoring of how our widgets use the toolbar
    • Worked on implementation of missing data model components in JavaScript
    • A lot of bug fixing
  • Events
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Rollout of phase 1 (language links) on all remaining Wikipedias is still planned for March 6
    • Next update on wikidata.org is also planned for March 6. This will have bugfixes and if all goes well string as a new available data type.
    • Proposal was made to the Hungarian, Hebrew and Italian Wikipedias to be the first batch to use phase 2 of Wikidata (infoboxes). Scheduled timeframe for this is end of March
    • d:Wikidata:Database reports has some useful reports like the list of most used properties
    • The interwiki shortcut :d was changed to always use www in the resulting link (to prevent editing issues on other URLs).
    • The list of available properties is growing and a whole bunch of new ones are being discussed
    • Reasonator gives you a nice adapted view of an item about a person
    • Items by cat helps you find missing items in a certain Wikipedia category
    • A few more additions to d:Wikidata:Tools that you should have a look at if you’re editing statements
    • We now have more than 2600 active users on Wikidata. Thanks for being awesome. <3
  • Open Tasks for You

re: Skift delete

[edit]

OK I can look at adding more to the article or finding more sources. Thanks for the help! Yloop (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Occidental Hotels & Resorts

[edit]

Could you please review my article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kris.sordo/Hotel, and see if it now can be published. Thanks. --Kris.sordo (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #48

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Unblock request

[edit]

There is a response to your message at User talk:Scootertuner1001. Very likely you are watching, but I thought there was no harm in making sure. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #49

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
    • Development
    • Design improvements to the SetClaim API module
    • More work on implementing the simple inclusion syntax that will be 1 way to access Wikidata data on Wikipedia
    • More work on Lua (the second way to access Wikidata data on Wikipedia)
    • Added parser page property to hold entity id in client. This fixes:
      • bugzilla:45037 - don’t show edit link if noexternallanglinks has suppressed all Wikidata links
      • bugzilla:44536 - have the edit link go directly to the Q### pages, instead of Special:ItemByTitle which shall make the link be more reliable and work for all namespaces
    • Selenium tests for deleted-property-handling
    • Selenium tests for multiline references
    • Selenium tests for add-sitelinks-from-client
    • Selenium tests for Entity-Selector-as-Searchbox
    • Selenium tests for language-table
    • Implemented in-process caching for entities
    • Lua support to access the repo data and implement getEntity (so you can use stuff like entity = mw.wikibase.getEntity("Q1459") in Lua modules)
    • rebuildTermSearchKey is now ready for production (this still needs to be run but once done it will make search case-insensitive)
    • Improved error reports from the API
    • Ground work for better edit summaries from the API
    • Added a table of content to item pages
    • Added debug functionality to be able to investigate why it takes longer than it should for Wikidata changes to show up on recent changes and watchlists on Wikipedia
    • Finished implementation of References-UI
    • Implemented GUID generator in JavaScript
    • Worked on fixing a bug related to deleted properties where the UI would display wrong information
    • Minor fixes/additions to the JS datamodel implementation
    • Minor bugfixes in Statements-UI
    • More work on RDF export
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Did you know?
    • If you add a Babel box to your user page Wikidata will show you items and descriptions in other languages you speak as well without you having to switch the language
    • Want to know which items use a certain property? Try the “what links here” link on a property page
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 18:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #50

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Rolled out new code on wikidata.org. The new stuff you probably care about is:
      • Improved references. They can now have multiple lines. This should make references much more useful. You can now have one reference with for example values for each of the properties "book", "author", "page" to describe one source.
      • Fixed the prev/next links in diff view (bugzilla:45821)
      • d:Special:EntitiesWithoutLabel now lets you filter by language and entity type
    • Widget to add language links on the Wikipedias directly: added setting to enable/disable it per wiki and made it available for logged-in users only
    • Widget to add language links on the Wikipedias directly: improved layout / size
    • Made it so that the “edit links” link on Wikipedia is also shown when the corresponding item only has a link to this one language and no other languages
    • Submitted improved Apache config patch to make wikidata.org always redirect to www.wikidata.org, which is awaiting code review and deployment.
    • Improved the script that is responsible for taking Wikidata changes to the Wikipedias
    • Added a few ways to better debug the script responsible for taking Wikidata changes to the Wikipedias. This should help with investigating why some changes take way to long to show up on the Wikipedias.
    • Started work on automatically adding edited items to the user’s watchlist (according to preferences)
    • Finished script for rebuilding search keys, so we can finally get case insensitive matches in a lot of places
    • Support for multi-line references in diff view
    • Selenium tests for inclusion syntax
    • Improved parser function (that will be used to access Wikidata data on the Wikipedias) to accept property ID or label
    • Increased isolation of data model component to increase clarity and visibility of bad dependencies
    • Worked on schema access in the SQLStore (of the query component)
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • 3rd Media Web Symposium 2013
    • Wikidata trifft Archäologie
    • SMWCon Spring NYC
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Did you know?
    • When you edit a statement there is a little wheel in front of the text field. This lets you choose between “custom value”, “unknown value” and “no value”. “No value” means that we know that the given property has no value, e.g. Elizabeth I of England had no spouse. “Unknown value” means that the property has a value, but it is unknown which one -- e.g. Pope Linus most certainly had a year of birth, but it is unknown to us.
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 00:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

trouble in uploading image

[edit]

I have tried to repeatedly trying to upload an image from an external source to an article called grey wolf. There is a user always trying to delete that. Both wolf are of same species . This is the image i am trying to replace with [|this one ] with[|this ] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.62.118.173 (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #51

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • The first 11 Wikipedias can now include data from Wikidata in their articles (If you want to see it in action see the infobox at it:Torino)
    • Worked on automatic summaries for statements
    • Worked on making properties accessible from the client using their label so you can use {{#property:executive director}} instead of {{#property:p169}} for example
    • Made qualifiers ready for the next deployment (Please test. See details further down.)
    • Selenium tests for qualifiers
    • Fixed some issues related to QUnit testing
    • Worked on improved handling and code design of multiple snak lists in the UI (qualifiers, references)
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • Newline 2013
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • We’re currently carefully monitoring performance after the deployment of phase 2 on the first 11 Wikipedias. There seem to be a few small issues. As soon as they are resolved we'll deploy on English Wikipedia. All other Wikipedias are planned to follow very soon after that.
    • Bye and a big thank you to Anja, Silke, Jens and John who are leaving the development team at the end of the month and will work on other cool things. You’ll be missed!
    • Ever had any doubt about the possibilities of Wikidata? Talk to Wiri!
    • We worked on reducing the time it takes for Wikidata edits to show up in the Wikipedias and made some progress. Daniel posted an analysis
    • We started running a script on the database in order to make search on Wikidata case-insensitive. This should be finished in a few days and then search should be more useful.
    • In addition to the above we have rolled out a new search box that suggests items. This should also make finding things on Wikidata a lot easier for you.
    • We’re making some progress with Internet Explorer 8 support but there are a lot of issues with it (some outside our control). It’s unclear at the moment how much we can improve it still without spending an unjustified amount of time on it. You can follow the progress at bugzilla:44228
    • Edits are now auto-confirmed for users with more than 50 edits and account age 4 days: bugzilla:46461
    • Do you need old-style interwiki links for a sister project for example? This is for you
    • The Wikimedia Foundation applied as a mentoring organisation for Google Summer of Code again. We have proposed some Wikidata projects for students to take up if the Foundation is accepted again. At least 2 other organisations that applied also propose Wikidata ideas. More details on that once we know which organisations are accepted.
    • Denny hacked together a tree of life based on data from Wikidata
    • Wikidata was added to wikipulse
    • A template to retrieve data from Wikidata if no local value is set
  • Did you know?
  • Open Tasks for You
    • See note at the end of this weekly summary
    • Help test qualifiers (m:Wikidata/Notes/Data model primer#Qualifiers - see also example statements there) on the test wiki so we can roll it out with the next release
    • Did you file a bug report for Wikidata or did someone else do it for you? Please take a minute to check if it is still valid. (Thanks for filing it btw!)
    • Add some missing descriptions to those items with the same label?
    • Hack on one of these

Could I have 2 mins of your time? As I’ll be working on some other projects for Wikimedia Germany as well from now on the time I can spend on Wikidata will be reduced. This means I’ll have to figure out what is useful to spend time on. If you’re reading this could you let me know for example on this discussion page? Also if you have ideas how to improve the weekly summaries please post them. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk)

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 20:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #52

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • The first year is over. Thank you everyone for being amazing and helping to build Wikidata and making it more than we could possibly have hoped for already. <3
    • Put a lot of work into improved support for Internet Explorer 8
    • Worked on improving recent changes code in client
    • Finished valueview refactoring. Created new extension “ValueView”
    • Implemented string formatter
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • upcoming: GLAM-Wiki 2013
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Deployment of phase 2 on English Wikipedia is currently planned for April 8. The remaining Wikipedias are scheduled for April 10. As usual this might change if we run into problems along the way.
    • There is now a page showing the current lag for changes propagating to the Wikipedias so they can show up in watchlists and recent changes for example. This should ideally be in the range of a few minutes. Right now it is higher because of some abnormally high bot activity but decreasing. Should be down to a few minutes soon.
    • There’s now a badge you can add to Wikipedia articles to indicate there is data about it on Wikidata
    • We hit Q10000000
    • A Wikidata item in the wild ;-)
  • Did you know?
  • Open Tasks for You

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

[edit]
Hello, Bjelleklang.

You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Wikidata weekly summary #53

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Got some external professional review of our code and architecture and started working on their feedback
    • Worked on reducing the dispatch lag (the time it takes for changes on Wikidata to be sent to the Wikipedias for display in watchlist, recent changes and to purge affected pages)
    • Worked on using Redis for job queue to improve the lag situation even further
    • Created new Wikibase Query extension for phase 3 functionality
    • Autocomments & Autosummaries for SetClaim module
    • Worked on the GeoCoordinate parser
  • Events/Press
    • right now: GLAM-WIKI 2013
  • Discussions
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Deployment of phase 2 on the remaining Wikipedias was delayed because of a high lag of changes being propagated to the Wikipedias. The lag has been reduced considerably now and is going down even more. The new date for deployment will not be next week because there are other large changes on Wikimedia infrastructure scheduled that we do not want to interfere with. It will hopefully happen very soon after that though.
    • Next code update on wikidata.org is planned for Wednesday. This should include qualifiers and bugfixes.
    • There will probably be a short outage/read-only for wikidata.org on Tuesday (database is being switched to MariaDB)
    • If you're a student and interested in coding on Wikidata consider applying for Google Summer of Code.
    • There is a new user right: property creators
    • There is now a page to request deletion of a property
    • We now have Bureaucrats
    • Reasonator was improved and extended (1 2)
  • Open Tasks for You

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 23:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #54

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Dispatch lag is now down to 0 so changes should show up very quickly on the Wikipedias in watchlists and recent changes
    • wikidata.org now always redirects to www.wikidata.org. This should among other things solve the issue where people were not able to edit when on wikidata.org (bugzilla:45005)
    • Fixed weird blocked-user/protected-page handling in UI (bugzilla:45140)
    • Final meetings for the external professional review of our code and architecture. They were quite happy with the quality of the codebase and gave useful tips for improvements
    • Worked on automatic summaries for editing claims
    • Investigation of different JavaScript frameworks dealing with date and time
    • Worked on using Redis and the job queue for change notifications to clients
    • Work on the storage code for answering queries
  • Events/Press
    • GLAM-WIKI 2013
    • upcoming: office hour on IRC about sources
    • upcoming: Opensource Treffen
    • upcoming: intro to Wikidata at the British Library
  • Discussions
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Help Project newsletter : Issue 6

[edit]
The Help Project Newsletter

Issue VI - April 2013

Open Help Conference

The Open Help Conference will be taking place June 15-19 in Cincinnati Ohio, USA. The conference includes two days of presentations and open discussions, followed by team "sprints" - collaborative efforts to write and improve documentation.

It has been suggested to send a team from Wikipedia/Wikimedia: to share our own knowledge about help, learn from others in the open source community working on similar problems, and to carry out a sprint to improve some aspect of Wikipedia's help.

There may be support available for volunteers to attend from the Participation Support program (and your editor is certainly hoping to be there!) Please join the discussion in Meta's IdeaLab if you're interested, and/or have suggestions about what we could work on.

Other news

If you don't wish to receive this newsletter on your talk page in future then just edit the participants page and add "no newsletter" next to your name.

Suggestions for future issues are welcome at Wikipedia:Help Project/Newsletter.

the wub "?!" 16:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #55

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #56

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

This Month in GLAM: April 2013

[edit]


Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #57

[edit]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

What Katie Did (lingerie) page

[edit]

Hi Bjelleklang,

I saw that you turned down the page I submitted for What Katie Did. What Katie Did is the world's leading brand of vintage inspired lingerie and have dressed just about every A-lister going, as well as supplying lingerie for lots of films and TV shows. What improvements can I make to ensure it gets through?

Thanks

Patricia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriciasage (talk • contribs) 23:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bjelleklang/Archive_5&oldid=1151037695"