User talk:Biswajeet34

Welcome!

Hello, Biswajeet34, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ho people

Stop reverting to a bad version. This article is in terrible condition. I am copy-editing and fixing the poor sourcing and violations of WP:BLP. The previous version you keep reverting to is full of poor English, poor formatting, outdated sources and irrelevant information.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 10:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Your recent editing history at Ho people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 10:46, 9 October 2017

stop vandalising ho tribe wikipedia ...if you have accurate reliable evidence then edit otherwise it may violate wikipedia editing policy.. if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Biswajeet34 reported by User:WilliamThweatt (Result: ). Thank you. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 11:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Tribe are also residing in Odisha,Jharkhand,Westbengal,Assam,Madhyapradesh,Bihar also.If you have doubt, you can ask me on my talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biswajeet34 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit Ho Tribe wikipedia by accurate,reliable sources with proper history,anthropology knowledges.please donot vandalise the Ho tribe wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biswajeet34 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jomnama Parob

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jomnama Parob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ammarpad (talk) 08:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Culture of Ho tribe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Culture of Ho tribe, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox main festival of Ho tribe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox main festival of Ho tribe, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jomnama Parob

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jomnama Parob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diyeng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diyeng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diyeng until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mage Porob

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mage Porob, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Biswajeet34, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Mage Parob have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jahera bonga (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jahera bonga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Biswajeet34, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 09:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits and block warning

Please see User talk:EdJohnston#Biswajeet34. I think the other user may be recommending a block under WP:Competence is required. You may respond there if you wish. I notice you created a badly malformed template at Template:Culture of Ho tribe, which got speedy deleted as a WP:CSD#G2 (test page) and then was immediately recreated by you. This is not a good sign. If you are uncertain of how we normally do things, you should be asking for advice and not jumping into edit wars and creating un-keepable articles. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Mage Parab has been described as incoherent nonsense and at first glance that is my opinion as well. You do not seem to have enough skill or judgment to contribute articles to Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 01:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Biswajeet34, if you don't respond and propose some way to address these concerns, I will be going ahead with a block of your account. I notice you have continued to edit today while making no response. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 12:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If your comment here on my talk is the best you can do, I plan to go ahead with the block. Since you've had numerous warnings and have had copyright violations flagged, it seems unlikely that you are going to start following our policy any time soon. Your offer to substantiate your changes rings hollow; it would be better to explain how you will be able to follow Wikipedia policy in the future, without making so many mistakes. Since you don't admit any mistakes, that will be hard. EdJohnston (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biswajeet34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Biswajeet34 13:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Responding to the comment below, there are multiple issues here. There is first an issue with competence. You created multiple articles which were deleted for simply not being encyclopedic, or incoherent to the point they were nonsense. Additionally, there is clear documented evidence in your edit history that you were removing sourced information related to Hindus or Hinduism in multiple articles. That is evidence of POV editing and an anti-Hindu agenda. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, i am User:Biswajeet34 want to state that that i have been warning and threating by several wikipedia users. I am a research scholar . I was blocked by the User:Bishonen for anti hindu agenda without any proper evidences of anti hindu agenda which is the clearcut violation of wikipedia blocking policies. I know and carefully gone through the rules and guidelines of wikipedia policies.Moreover , Tribes follow different beliefs and costums that of Hindus according to honourable Supreme court judgements and article 25 of indian constitution, Fifth and Sixth Schedule of The Indian Constitution and Pesa act of 1996.i am nothing to do with anti hindu agenda and even donot use the word hindu anywhere on my editing articles then how can the User:Bishonen block me by without any evidences of anti hindu agenda .There is vast difference between Hindutva and Hinduism. The reason for blocking for anti hindu agenda is uncleared & null-void without any evidences.This is a personal attack on User:Biswajeet34 which is the clearcut violation of wikipedia policies.If, User:Bishonen has any doubt ,then he can ask me on my wikipedia talkpage for healthy discussions.So, the wikipedia administrator should know about the facts and consider the matter and unblock me sothat i can contribute to the wikipedia articles with more accurate and reliable sources.

October 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —DoRD (talk) 14:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Today, you people are in majority with education.You are vandalising our tribal history,cultures and traditions and our constitutional rights according to article 19,article 25,article 29 ,article 30, fifth schedule and sixth schedule of indian constitution and pesa act of 1996 and honourable supreme court judgements on tribal religious beliefs and costumes. when i will get Indian Administrative Service , i will challenge you on Supreme court according to article 32 for violation of our Tribal fundamental rights of article 25 and fifth schedule of indian constitution,pesa act. Thanks for inspiring me ,now i will study hard to get Indian Administrative Service. I know our history very well,you cannot delegitimize or delete our history.Oneday, in wikipedia ,our tribal cultures,traditions and history will be definitely there. once ,again thanx for inspiring me study hard for Indian Administrative Service.Once again ,Thank you for block me, Now i will study hard to get Indian Administrative Service.

Legal threats added to the previous attacks. Your access to editing this page has been revoked. Bishonen | talk 08:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Biswajeet34, aben jaa'i tan reyoo anj lo'o jagar leeno' ben mise...

Jaa ge jemon ole re paiti kaa hobana, eta'a paa re dub ken te nel tan koo nel ko te hobana. Singkiring57 (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nena nel ke te esu giyu'u genj aday tana...Singkiring57 (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jahera bonga

Hello, Biswajeet34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jahera bonga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jahera bonga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Jahera bonga, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]