User talk:Biscuit-in-Chief

Welcome to my talk page. Please remember to write constructively

I was blocked a number of times in 2018; see User talk:Biscuit-in-Chief/Blocks.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Biscuit-in-Chief! You created a thread called Lunar Eclipse on July 27, 2018 at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Signature

It looks as if you've tried to customise your signature and made a mess of it. Perhaps on Special:Preferences you've mistakenly checked the box labelled "Treat the above as wiki markup"? If you can't customise it correctly, reset it to default settings. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Yep, realized that. My mum was nagging me, and I had to go. So I didn't have time to reset it to default. But, to answer your question, no, I haven't checked the box. I'll reset it to default now - Biscuit-in-Chief

Your thread has been archived

Hi Biscuit-in-Chief! You created a thread called Forgot the name to certain template at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Biscuit-in-Chief! You created a thread called Spelling mistake at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Biscuit-in-Chief. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Begoon 14:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Biscuit-in-Chief! You created a thread called Am I vandalising? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Family tree of the Greek gods, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Melia, Clymene and Asteria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for the link in this edit summary. Debresser (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Must admit, I'm pretty surprised someone even took the time to write a thank-you for something so small, so many thanks from me, too. And nice day to you. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 23:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

And happy birthday :-) —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 23:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks again. :) Debresser (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Please use standard capitalisation

Please stop writing "NF Real Music" (as it is used on Apple Music) as "NFREALMUSIC"; that's not standard capitalisation and you're using a stylisation. Also, I don't know why you would think the formats his latest album have been released on need verification when none of the others have—that's not very consistent. Rarely, unless the format is uncommon for that artist or time period, do we need or see verification of the formats. Unless you're going to be consistent and require citations for every single format all of NF's prior albums have been released on (which nobody has before you), then there is no point placing a CN tag there, and I assume other editors of the page will have an issue too. Ss112 09:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I just followed what the ref said; isn't that what we're supposed to do? Regarding the song formats, wouldn't it be OR to just say "Rarely, unless the format is uncommon for that artist or time period, do we need or see verification of the formats."? —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 11:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

No, per WP:TMRULES, we have our own rules on capitalisation on Wikipedia. Ss112 17:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Citation needed tags do not go in headings

This is not the correct place to put them. To tag a section, you use Template:Unsourced section or the like. It is not always required to directly cite a track listing section considering the source is the album itself (experienced editors will tell you this), but I have invoked the Apple Music citation (that was already defined in the lead, mind you) where I got the track listing from for your peace of mind, since you seem to think I pulled the track listing out of thin air. Thanks. Ss112 17:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Noted. Just wanted some WP:INTEGRITY. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 14:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Music credits

Hi. Again, regarding You (James Arthur album), you appear to have reverted at least one user over the credit on the song "Treehouse". I assume you do not know how music credits work and why the wording "with Ty Dolla Sign featuring Shotty Horroh" was used. The primary artist whose album is the topic at hand, James Arthur, is obviously not included at the start of this credit because that would be redundant. However, Ty Dolla Sign receives co-lead artist credit on the song, while Shotty Horroh receives a featuring credit. Ty Dolla Sign is not a featured artist on the song, he is a co-lead artist on the song. Please stop removing/altering this. It is fine and in no way "grammatically incorrect". Thank you. Ss112 04:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

WP:MEDRS

Regarding this, the reason I reverted is because we should to stick to WP:MEDRS-compliant sources for that topic. For example, we should typically avoid primary sources for that topic. See WP:Primary sources and WP:SCHOLARSHIP. Also, peer review is not the same thing as literature review. Please read and study WP:MEDRS. It begins with the following in its introduction: "Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially systematic reviews) published in reputable medical journals; academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers; and guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies. Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content – as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information, for example early in vitro results which don't hold in later clinical trials." You should be looking for secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, tertiary sources. You can look on Google Books if that will help. It often helps me. If you haven't looked on PubMed, look on there as well. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

@Flyer22 Reborn:Are you sure it is, though? I mean, the Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology cited it from the British Journal of Social Work, so it's a secondary source (per WP:MEDDEF: A secondary source in medicine summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources [emphasis added]), right? —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 10:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Pinging Doc James. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

And regardless, you added single study material. Why exactly should that single study material be included? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I was just reading and thought it was relevant. But if it's not suitable, fine. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(Talk – Contribs)} 15:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes a primary source per there methods "In total, 2934 seventh-grade students (M = 3.5, SD = 0.5) filled out questionnaires at school."

Better to use review articles. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts.
We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
• Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik ^talk 09:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the GOCE!

Hello Biscuit-in-Chief and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE)! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve the quality of writing on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!

• A how-to guide to Wikipeda copyediting
• Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS), a helpful guide to refer to while copy editing
  • A simplified version of the above
• A quick guide to writing on Wikipedia

You can help with copy-editing requests if you already have familiarity with the MOS and considerable English copy-editing skills, or start with articles tagged for copy editing to gain experience.

Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!

For the GOCE, --Puddleglum^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 14:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC) --Puddleglum^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 14:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 21:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gatekeeper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bouncer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Rekkles page. Source for birth.

So the lolpedia date is not correct ? But in a video he clearly said that he born in '96 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4TP2AKIiig) official statement. So at least you could left the year. Thank you Geroffs (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

It might be correct, but Gamepedia is, like Wikipedia, a wiki, so it's not an RS. But I'll leave in the birth year. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 13:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Help with editing

Hello, Biscuit-in-Chief thank you for the complement about my username I like yours too. I saw the Danish West Indies flag on the Us state flags page and noticed it wasn't the same as the flag on the page for the Danish West Indies. The day after, I looked and the Danish flag was put back. I was wondering which page was right, could you help me find out, please? Thanks,Chicken Nuggets on the Sidewalk (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi. you're welcome. I was the one who reverted your edit (see this). I've now also removed the flag from Flags of the U.S. states and territories, which I assume is the page you're talking about, for the same reason. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 09:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the help, that was the page I was talking about.
Chicken Nuggets on the Sidewalk (talk) 12:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mogens Høgh Jensen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Dansk tilbagetrækning fra EU

Can you support this Danish page, because after some time it will be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" and "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel" on this page https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU? Wname1 (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perkz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page T1.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

D614G

I took that from the rev https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420308205 where it said: "A SARS-CoV-2 variant with Spike G614 has replaced D614 as the dominant pandemic form" --Manorainjan 23:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Ah, OK, my bad. Guess that shows the importance of WP:OR . BTW, next time please write on the talk page and ping me there :-). —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 23:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

See Talk:D614G --Manorainjan 09:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

A greeting from a COVID-obsessed person

Hi; I hope I don't bother you by writing here just to tell you that I appreciate your many edits to keep Wikipedia up to date on the COVID-19 pandemic, edits which often pop up on my screen as I run an IRC channel about COVID-19 where, among other things, some Wikipedia articles are monitored. I have done some edits to COVID-related articles myself, but overall I haven't been very active on Wikipedia lately.

I got curious and clicked on your talk page, and found out with a bit of amusement that you apparently started out your Wikipedia "career" by being blocked for vandalism and sockpuppetry. I see you later received some... saying "vitriol" would be excessive, but stuff that you may have responded to in less calm and constructive ways.

I don't know about you, but I delve too much in negativity, and COVID-19 isn't a very positive thing, but I can't really help it, and so I found that turning the negativity into, arguably, positivity (like providing more information about it for everyone, whether it be by means of a chat room about it or by editing Wikipedia) can be a useful mental trick — hopefully both for me, you and others.

So since it's that time of the year, I wish you good things on Wikipedia and out of it, and I just ask you to remember where you started from: many people, arguably too many, end up being sticklers to the rules and entrenched in Wikipedia bureaucracy, and while to an extent that's inevitable, Wikipedia itself reminds us to actively keep some distance from that attitude. I don't say that because I think you need this reminder due to anything in particular, and I realize I may sound condescending, but it's just something that seemed worth saying.

So happy holidays, if at all possible in this situation, and many productive edits. LjL (talk) 02:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

This ... this made me smile. That you spend so much time on writing a personalised message here on Wikipedia is ... I don't know a word for it. "Insane but heartwarming"? :-) And yeah, the vandalism and the preceding ban are not exactly my proudest moments in life. My excuse is that I was 11 and bored ツ. I must admit I've wanted to archive it from my talk page several times, but I should probably keep it in there for transparency and as a reminder to stay humble. I feel like I've spent my second (and definitely my last) chance well, though. Also, could I be a part of that IRC channel? And If you're interested, my holidays have been with almost no social contact to anyone outside my house and practically no physical contact with anyone else because of self-isolation—hence why I've stayed up till around 3–4 a.m. most days, including today, to write stuff on Wikipedia . Anyway, now you're through this rather incoherent mess of a reply, I wish you and your loved ones happy holidays, too! —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 02:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

BTW, you seem like a brilliant human being! —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/)} 02:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Well, let's just say I've got time to use... and probably a sprinkle of insanity. To be fair, I also spend a lot of time acting annoyed at people on various places of the internet, so it seems fair to balance it out a little. Reading your page, your second chance definitely feels like it was being made "definitely the last", phew... That was probably what made me think to write about not becoming too rigid in applying rules (although while not a Wikipedia admin, I've been an op, mod, admin or what-you-call-it before and I've probably acted like that: you see so many people who are just there to make a fuss/mess, that you forget that maybe some of them realize it was silly and won't do it again, for real). As to removing the vandalism history from your page... I don't really have an opinion, but I think anyone who reads it beyond the initial block notification wouldn't think less of you afterwards. Anyway, if you want to peek into my channel, sure, this short document has all the pointers. There is also a long list of COVID-related links, although its organization is more haphazard than I'd like, and many of them are primary sources and preprints not suitable for Wikipedia. LjL (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Variant of Concern 202012/01, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terminus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Uffe Ellemann-Jensen

Vær så venlig ikke at redigere artikler såsom Uffe Ellemann-Jensen med mindre du læser og forstår kilderne. Man skulle formode, at hans nærmeste ville vide, hvilken dato han døde, jvf. salmebladet i Holmens, hvor jeg tvivler på. at du deltog. Sam Sailor 14:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Jeg forstår godt kilderne (jeg var på nippet til at tilføjet "18. juni eller 19. juni" til den danske artikel allerede den 19. på grund af den noget tvetydige forrmulering i medierne). Kun igennem https://denstoredanske.lex.dk/.versionview/744911, som jeg senere fandt, fik jeg dét med salmebladet at vide. Men du havde også kun tilføjet en enkelt ref, og dét var til TV 2, ikke til nogen familiemedlemmer. Jeg så først udsendelsen fra Holmens Kirke bagefter, og Jakob skrev jo også 19. juni i et facebookopslag at han var død den nat. Så jeg prøvede blot at opsummere hvad kilderne havde sagt. Omend redigeringen var forhastet fra min side. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(ˈ[d̥͡soːg̊ʰ] – [ˈg̊ʰɒ̹nd̥͡sɹ̠ɪb̥s])} 14:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Du forstår ikkke kilderne. Du skal stoppe med dine edits på UEJ både her og på da.wiki. Hvis du fortsætter, vil du til sidst ende på AN/I med et forslag om at du bliver helt eller delvist blokeret. Jeg er altid villig til at hjælpe dig med at komme igang med at redigere i henhold til WPs standarder. Sam Sailor 14:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

The next place for you, if you insist, is Talk:Uffe Ellemann-Jensen per WP:BRD. Sam Sailor 14:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Field's

@Biscuit-in-Chief: Thank you for the depressing article. I just created one but you beat me to it. Shall we merge or what is the plan? (See 2022 Copenhagen shooting). Wretchskull (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Hehe, thought that might happen. I see you have merged it. Better with English sources, I must say. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(ˈ[d̥͡soːg̊ʰ] – [ˈg̊ʰɒ̹nd̥͡sɹ̠ɪb̥s])} 18:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Do you think the title should be changed? Aren't shootings usually characterized by the city they took place in? Or perhaps we can change it to "2022 Field's shooting"? Wretchskull (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

I won't be able to answer for the next two and a half hours or so—I am currently in a cinema—but feel free to do that! It works fine. I was looking at Robb Elementary School shooting when I decided not to put the year/date in. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{(ˈ[d̥͡soːg̊ʰ] – [ˈg̊ʰɒ̹nd̥͡sɹ̠ɪb̥s])} 18:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Smells Like Me

Hello, Biscuit-in-Chief

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Smells Like Me, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 19:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

AllMusic sidebar not considered suitable for genres

Hello. In regards to using the sidebar on AllMusic, this is considered at odds with the reviews AllMusic's contributors write and has been considered unsuitable for use per WP:ALBUMAVOID ("AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided. Previous discussions at WP:ALBUMS and RSN have evinced that they can be incongruous with the reviewer's prose, which should take precedent over the sidebar..."). Thanks. Ss112 02:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Biscuits and danishes

Chinese danishes

Your username is very cool! I like your block log, too. Have some Danish pastries from China. And thank you for reverting Rasmus Paludan (Danish). Bishonen | tålk 19:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC).

Thank you! Getting blocked by a website's founder is infinitely cooler, though. Also, the å in signature talk link happens to be a Danish letter. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{([ˈd̥͡soːg̊ʰ] – [ˈg̊ʰɒ̹nd̥͡sɹ̠ɪb̥s])} 08:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I'm very proud of my Jimbo block, thanks for noticing. Compare also WP:BLOCKABDICATE. A Danish letter, eh? No, my å in tålk is the Swedish å.😜 I thought the Danish å was spelled aa, but I'm probably behind the times. However... I just tried to look up Ålborg and was redirected to Aalborg. I think that proves my point! [Bishonen tries experimentally to spell "Kierkegaard" as "Kierkegård" in her head. Now that looks awful. Åwful.] Bishonen | tålk 17:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC).

Juxtaposition

Hello. Regarding this edit, I'd only agree with changing "and" to "but" if it were always a sure thing an album's critical reception had anything to do with its commercial performance. I'm aware of cases where what critics have said or bestowed on an album has influenced its commercial success, but having "but" there seems jarring as if we're saying "in spite of this, the public loved it", whereas it's just something that happened simultaneously. Ss112 17:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Scandinavian Airlines

Hi there,

I noticed your edit on the Scandinavian Airlines page that you made in June, and I saw that you changed the founding date of Star Alliance from 1997 (the correct date) to 1991 without citations. Even though I have since corrected this issue, I wanted to let you know to check sources and adequately reference when you make changes such as these. Thanks. A^yd_oh⁸ ( _t a ^l k ₎ 02:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Is 180.248.191.133 your sockpuppet?

Probably not, but idk. 180.248.9.16 (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Nope, never seen that IP in my life. —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) ^{([ˈd̥͡soːg̊ʰ] – [ˈg̊ʰɒ̹nd̥͡sɹ̠ɪb̥s])} 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)