User talk:Birdonetwo

Welcome!

Hello, Birdonetwo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please don't use user-generated sources like open wikis as citations, particularly on articles about living people - these should use only reliable references. If you need help determining whether a particular source is reliable, you can ask at the Teahouse or the reliable sources noticeboard. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't use open wikis as citations - they are not reliable. Also, external links shouldn't be used in article text, but only in the External links section or in references. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kyle Gupton

Hello, Birdonetwo,

Thanks for creating Kyle Gupton! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The Player profile section needs more citations

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Liedel

The article Mary Liedel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently sourced only with primary sources. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:COLLATH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Liedel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Liedel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Liedel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]