User talk:BioFactChecker

March 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MrOllie,

What exactly was NOT constructive? The Cassava Sciences page has a lot of misinformation and inaccurate info. I updated that page to reflect the current status of the the Phase 2 and phase 3 trials. I also noticed that the page does NOT have all the new board members and management staff. In addition, what exactly does spreading mis-information about 2 year old "Investigations" that didn't go anywhere do other than to specifically try and discourage people from investing in this company. BioFactChecker (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cassava Sciences. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Cassava Sciences has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So are you another fudster who is being paid to remove any positive content about Cassava Sciences from Wiki?

It is a shame you are allowed to remove accurate and positive info and call it copyright violation because it certainly was not. BioFactChecker (talk) 03:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BioFactChecker. No, I have never been paid to edit any article, and I have no financial conflict of interest with Cassava Sciences. How about you? I had to look up fudster, and I'm sure that's inaccurate.

I can't tell if you're lashing out or misunderstanding the copyright policy. Just in case: if you copy and paste copyrighted text into Wikipedia articles, you're violating our policies and will likely be blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SighSci per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SighSci. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 02:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]