Jump to content

User talk:Bill william compton/Archive 19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21→Archive 25

Love and Mary

Hello.

Your Plot Summary at the article you created entitled Love and Mary is a flagrant copyright violation of THIS COPYRIGHTED PIECE by Mark Deming in the New York Times. Such extremely close paraphrases must be avoided. I have blanked the entire section as a copyright violation, do not restore it. If you are aware of similar instances of close paraphrase that you have inserted at Wikipedia, please remove that material immediately. Thank you. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 04:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi again.

The 2007-08 bullet-point section of your article Sanam Singh is a direct copy-and-paste copyright violation inserting material from THIS PIECE FROM COLLEGE TENNIS ONLINE. I have blanked the subsection as a copyright violation and will be further examining this piece. Do not restore this material. Please get busy fixing your copyright issues, which I suspect might be numerous. I will be contacting an administrator seeking removal of your Auto-Confirmed rights. Thanks. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 04:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Bill.

I'm starting to pick through your new starts from the beginning. Your piece University School of Information Technology is probably a copyright violation from start to finish. Certainly the "Programs" section is a direct copy-and-paste from THIS. I have blanked this section as a copyright violation, do not restore it. Please take this one from the top, rewriting everything in a manner which does not violate copyright law. Thanks. —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Dang, I'm getting to be a regular here.

Your article Education in Delhi opens with a massive copy-and-paste copyright violation from THIS. I did not look over the rest of the article, but I think it is highly likely that there is other offending material to be cleaned up. I have deleted the offending opening section as a copyright violation, do not restore this material. It is probably time for you to take a break from your other Wikipedia activities so that you may dedicate time to go through your entire contribution history, cleaning up copyright violations. Please drop me a line letting me know if you are aware of this problem. Thanks. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 05:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

AN/I

There is a thread at WP:AN/I (Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents) in which you are mentioned, relating to Love and Mary. Best regards, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 06:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom

My edit summary associated with removal of your copyright violation in Love and Mary has drawn an unsolicited email from a certain Fred Bauder ((Redacted)), who did not identify his capacity at EnWP or WMF or specify his exact concerns in his message to me. He invited me to contact ArbCom by email (arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org) if I cared to comment, which I have done, and to make sure to notify you that I did that, which I am now doing. If that sounds mysterious, ambiguous, and befuddling, it is because that is the way Wikipedia's dysfunctional Cult of Anonymity would have it. Best regards, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I've redacted Fred's private email address as I've really no idea why you think he would want it posted publicly. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
We received a request for oversight about an edit comment made by Carrite which contained a link to Wikipediocracy.org. The problem was that the page contains personal information in addition to Carrite's complaint about your editing. The edit comment was deleted but can be viewed by administrators. User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. Carrite (talk) 19:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

WikiProject Wikify April Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate London Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's New South Wales Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr (Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare (Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus (Alaska Keilana (submissions) and New South Wales Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John (Indiana Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Because of the above noted copyright violations, I have for now revoked your "autopatrolled" and "reviewer" rights, so that your new articles appear in the unpatrolled section of the new papes patrol, and that you can't review them. Please try to help with identifying and correcting your copyright violations. Note that any new copyright violations may get this account blocked. Fram (talk) 08:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I have since noted that you are involved with Gibraltarpedia. Please note that my above actions have nothing to do with this, and were caused by Carrite's detections and his request at my talk page to look into this (also, as far as I can see, not motivated by any Gibraltarpedia-related history, but because we had both worked on a recent copyvio-related ArbCom case). I'll probably refrain from taking further admin actions related to you (certainly negative ones like taking away user rights), to avoid the impression that I am involved and did this for some ulterior motive. I didn't associate you with Gibraltarpedia (I only remember interacting with Prioryman, Gibmetal, LauraHale, and a few others) and don't recall any previous interaction with you (but there probably have been some, I have interacted with most active editors by now I presume). Fram (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
In what sense, if any, do you consider Laura to be associated with Gibraltarpedia, Fram? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
These are my first few creations, which I created during the time I was very new to project and knew nothing about copyrights or plagiarism. Since then I've created several articles and none of them has any trace of copyright infringement. Moreover, many of them are considered quality content. I accept that I should have cleaned-up them. What I'm unable to understand is why have I been penalised for my 'newbie' time contributions. With a few rare exceptions, every new user makes mistake. Now I'm a new page patroller with almost perfect CSD log. How can I not be trusted with new or pending changes? — Bill william comptonTalk 04:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I have no means of knowing how long those copyvios continued, and as long as that isn't cleared out, some basic actions were taken. (Pending changes is hardly an issue, very few articles have it anyway). And it wouldn't be the first time that featured content turns out to be partially plagiariased, so while it gives some confidence to see your good article work, it doesn't necessarily mean that there are no problems with it. Fram (talk) 07:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Fram, did you miss my question? In what sense, if any, do you consider Laura to be associated with Gibraltarpedia? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm open for any type of investigation. How can I have a clean slate against my name, once and for all!? — Bill william comptonTalk 12:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
If you could give (for a start) a cursory look at your older contributions, and indicate where approximately you believe that copyright violations are likely to have stopped, or from which date backwards on more checks are needed, then we can start checking this and make a more informed decision. At first glance, your recent article creations are copyvio-free, but I don't think we have an idea yet of how far this problem goes. For me personally, getting the impression that a) the problem no longer occurs, and b) you are helping to identify and/or remove older violations, is sufficient. Like I said, if you consider me to be involved and would like some other admin to take over here, just let me know. The outcome may be the same or not, no guarantees there. Fram (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I've checked some articles with the duplicate detector and haven't found any problem. I'm confident that there are no copyvio problems after January 19, 2011. I'll look more closely later, but you are more than welcome to recheck. Thanks for bearing with me. I'll cooperate in any way you want. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I took a look at your articles from February 2011, and the first one I checked, [1] from 25 February, seems to be a copyright violation from [2] from 24 February 2011 (probably the original source is something else, but that's not really the point). So it looks as if the copyright problems continued at least for a month more. Fram (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I only checked articles created by me. Will give a thorough review to all contributions. — Bill william comptonTalk 02:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Another, smaller one here [3] from [4] and here [5]. It's just two sentences but both are copied verbatim.Volunteer Marek 19:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I've started clean-up process. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't immediately notice any remaining problems (spot-checking some of the larger contributions you made). Thanks for the clean-up. I'll restore your user rights (I guess that no one will object to this with "involved" claims ;-) ). Fram (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup! — Bill william comptonTalk 14:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

DYK nomination of 2009 Mediterranean Games medal table

Hello! Your submission of 2009 Mediterranean Games medal table at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

2010 Asian Games Opening Ceremony

I decided to ask about this to you because I couldn't decide about to add the info or not. When I was watching 2010 Asian Games opening ceremony parade of nations, the song played during Indonesia parade is Garuda Pancasila (Indonesian patriotic song). Then, I started to think that the country's local famous song was played when each country paraded to the arena. Is this little info worth to add or not?

Here's the youtube link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h85zlL6y-a8 Griff88 (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes indeed it certainly is. But you have to provide a citation for this statement. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

DYK for 2009 Mediterranean Games medal table

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Template:Did you know nominations/2009 Mediterranean Games medal table

Hello, Bill william compton. You have new messages at Allen3's talk page.
Message added --Allen3 talk 17:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Bill william compton. You have new messages at Allen3's talk page.
Message added --Allen3 talk 18:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arrow intertitle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arrow intertitle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and second place Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cricket kenya logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cricket kenya logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

Tech news: 2013-24

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.

Recent software changes
(Not all changes will affect you.)
  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.22/wmf6) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on June 6, and to non-Wikipedia wikis on June 10. It will be enabled on all Wikipedias on June 13. [6]
  • An alpha version of the VisualEditor was enabled on all Wikipedias on June 6. Please test it and report problems. [7]
  • Several VisualEditor bugs have been fixed; users can now add, edit and remove categories using the editor's "Page settings" menu.
  • Wikimedia error messages will no longer link to the #wikipedia [[<tvar|meta-irc-chans>:m:IRC/Channels</>|IRC channel]] on Freenode. [8]
  • The logo of 16 Wikipedias was changed to version 2.0 in a fourth group of updates. [9]
  • A test instance of Wikidata is now available at test.wikidata.org. [10]
  • Users can now patrol the first version of a newly created page if they visit it from Special:NewPages or Special:RecentChanges. [11]
  • Translation pages will no longer include edit section links (bug #40713). [12]
Future software changes
  • A report on mobile upload errors was published, and software changes to reduce their number will come soon. [13]
  • A request for comments on updating MediaWiki to use RDFa version 1.1 was started on MediaWiki.org (Gerrit change #67608).

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe.

20:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Tech News: 2013-25

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
(Not all changes will affect you.)
  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.22wmf7) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on June 13. It will be enabled on non–Wikipedia sites on June 17, and on all Wikipedias on June 20. [14]
  • The Narayam and WebFonts extensions were successfully replaced by Universal Language Selector on June 11. [15]
  • VisualEditor news:
    • VisualEditor was temporarily disabled on Wikipedia sites on June 14 due to an issue that inserted a lot of HTML code. The issue is now fixed and VisualEditor works as before.
    • Users can now use VisualEditor to add images and other media items from their local wikis and Wikimedia Commons. [16].
    • VisualEditor also allows editing references. [17]
  • The new Disambiguator extension, which was previously part of MediaWiki itself, was enabled on test wikis. It adds the magic word __DISAMBIG__ to mark disambiguation pages. [18]
  • The newly enabled Campaigns extension allows Wikimedia Foundation data analysts to track account creations that result from a specific outreach campaign.
Future software changes
  • Universal Language Selector will be added to the Catalan (ca), Cebuano (ceb), Persian (fa), Finnish (fi), Norwegian Bokmål (no), Portuguese (pt), Ukrainian (uk), Vietnamese (vi), Waray-Waray (war) and Chinese (zh) Wikipedias on June 18. [19]
  • Starting on June 18, VisualEditor will be randomly enabled by default for half of newly created accounts on the English Wikipedia to test stability, performance and features. [20]
  • Two new webfonts (UnifrakturMaguntia and Linux Libertine) will be added to wikis that use Universal Language Selector. [21] [22]
  • It will now be possible to hide the sidebar while using the Translate extension to reduce distractions (bug #45836). [23]
  • A patrolling link will now be visible for un-patrolled pages, even if users don't visit it from Special:NewPages or Special:RecentChanges (bug #49123). [24]
  • A request for comments on enabling a new search engine for MediaWiki was started.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe. 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

Tech news: 2013-26

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
(Not all changes will affect you.)
  • The latest version of MediaWiki (1.22wmf8) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on June 20. It will be enabled on non–Wikipedia sites on June 24, and on all Wikipedias on June 27. [25]
  • Universal Language Selector was successfully enabled on the Catalan (ca), Cebuano (ceb), Persian (fa), Finnish (fi), Norwegian Bokmål (no), Portuguese (pt), Ukrainian (uk), Vietnamese (vi), Waray-Waray (war) and Chinese (zh) Wikipedias. [26]
  • The new interface for account creation and log–in is now the default on all Wikimedia wikis. The old look is no longer available (bug #46333). [27]
  • The TimedMediaHandler extension now supports native FLAC files. A discussion to allow this file type is taking place on Commons (bug #49505). [28]
  • After a test period, the Disambiguator extension was enabled on the English Wikipedia on June 18. [29]
  • VisualEditor news:
    • A VisualEditor bug temporarily made all new accounts unusable. The issue is now fixed and account creation works as before (bug #49727).
    • A high importance file insertion bug has been fixed, but the feature does not work perfectly yet. [30]
  • It is now possible to synchronise local CSS and JavaScript files with the beta cluster. This should make it easier to test software features before they are enabled on live wikis. [31]
Future software changes
  • The default link to a help page on editing, visible below the editing window, will change on almost 600 Wikimedia wikis and will now link to MediaWiki.org (bug #45977). [32]
  • Universal Language Selector will be enabled on wikis without language versions (such as Wikisource and Wikispecies) on June 25. [33]
  • The AbuseFilter extension will allow filtering links and HTML code for page creations. [34]
  • The related changes special page will now include upload log entries. [35]
  • It will soon be possible to choose the language of SVG files that contain translations. [36]
  • MediaWiki will now allow converting audio files from one format to another. [37]
  • The Wikidata technical team has started a discussion about how Wikidata can support Wiktionary. [38]
  • The search feature on Wikimedia sites is planned to be modified to use Solr on all wikis by the end of 2013. [39]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

2009 Mediterranean Games GA

Hello, the original reviewer has made a couple comments on my talk page. Apparently s/he doesn't feel as though his/her original concern about controversies has been addressed and you had indicated that you would look into it. I have replied saying why I felt justified in passing the article to GA and also that I didn't feel as though it would be a good idea to reverse that decision. Would you be able to look at any controversies that may have arisen as a result of the Games and make any additions you feel would address that topic? Thanks. H1nkles (talk) citius altius fortius 16:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bill_william_compton/Archive_19&oldid=1168299420"