User talk:Bilal philosopher

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Bilal philosopher, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Vanjagenije Vanjagenije (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation

Please put spaces after your punctuation in articles. It's incorrect styling. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 11:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC) you can put it without asking me[reply]

November 2016

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Vinzce, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC) @Vanjagenije , you remove categories and make templates for asking to it !!! why you had remove classicism worjs of Paul Vincze belongs to that , do you undertand art styles ?? r u a jew ?? whats ur problem with vinzce ??[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Paul Vinzce, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page

Hi, just a few things: thank you for trying to contribute to Wikipedia. I really appreciate it, and I am glad more Islamic thought articles are being created. Whenever you write a message on someone's talk page, it is normally best to hit the "+" sign beside "edit" at the top of the page so it will be at the bottom. You should also sign your comments with four tildes "~" These can be found right above the edit summary box for ease of use.

As to your critique: that article was written in choppy English with a lot of misspellings. To me, it looked like English was not your first language and I was trying to edit for flow and consistency so that native readers could better understand it. Please know this is trying to help. Additionally, "still" can be used as an adverb in English. In the sentence you are mentioning, "being" is the verb and "still" is an adverb modifying it. Splitting that sentence up is actually a better way to describe it.

Also, civility is a core tenant of Wikipedia. If you have issues with my editing, please let me know, but it isn't generally a good idea to tell someone not to edit.

Again, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! TonyBallioni (talk) 19:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Truth in Muhammad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Truth in Muhammad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Truth in Muhammad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Vanjagenije. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC) @MLpearc: : send the same message to user talk:Vanjagenije to for his harass on my talk .--Bilal philosopher (talk) 18:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Actuality (Hegel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Actuality (Hegel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actuality (Hegel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]