User talk:Bigfootwriter

Welcome!

Hello, Bigfootwriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Bigfootwriter, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bigfootwriter

A tag has been placed on User:Bigfootwriter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why

did you make this comment? YODADICAE👽 21:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigfootwriter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked, I have only ever in all the months I have had this account made a single edit. I am a published author, with a number of books available online for almost 10 years, I have never abused this account or posted anything malicious on any page. As for the IP address, I am in a hotel at present, so no idea who else is here or what they may have done in the past. I opened this account in my author pen name, bigfoot, and you can find me on Amazon. I opened a second wiki account in my personal name two weeks ago, and made a few edits, and added a page, I believed with the utmost sincerity the items I put up were newsworthy, and well-referenced, written in a neutral way. I was told they weren't, I tried to get constructive criticism and advice, that never happened, and I have not attempted to do anything further. I did however make a number of contributions on pages I was looking at for research, where additional info was asked for on the page, and I have knowledge of the subject, so I contributed. I am happy if for some reason you want to permanently remove the martin paul Ireland page, but surely I can have this page in my author pen name, or do you not want authors to write??? I do not know if you have actually constructively looked at te very few items I wrote, because I have great difficulty understanding what was incorrect, offensive or openly bias Bigfootwriter (talk) 07:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry and block evasion wrt Martin Paul Ireland. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.