User talk:Bige1977

Welcome!

Hello, Bige1977, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sceptr e ^(Talk) 23:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've deleted Joshua David Gottschling, because its subject does not seem to meet our notability requirements. Please do not re-create the article, and please review Wikipedia's five pillars before creating any more articles. Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 04:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not recall creating that article. I probably was the one who nominated it for Speedy Deletion. Bige1977 04:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You nominated Latin American Miracles for speedy deletion on the grounds of copyright, but didn't say where it was copyright from. If it is not blatent copyright violation is is not a CSD, and should go through the usual copyright violation procedure. DJ Clayworth 14:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aharon Shteinman

Re: [1]. He's one of the most important rabbis living today. But it's hard to verify, b/c these guys don't really use the internet, and b/c his name was misspelled by the creator. Go figure! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 11:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whistle register singers

It's a CATEGORY, and I may simply be putting its delition request in the wrong place. I am new to this set up. Tantris 16:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endless Online (2nd nomination)

Hi, Steve block placed a convincing argument in favor for deletion on the linked deletion request which cites WP:V in saying that the content needs to be verified with third-party content. Just letting you know. —THIS IS MESSEDOCKER (TALK) 00:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OsteoBall

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I've deleted those articles now. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 03:53, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collection of spellings (Akidd_dublin)

Some people believe the Mad Magazine is a great danger, a malicious threat. Therefore, it is not available in some countries. I do not include who wrote it, I do not include aggressive things. Probably i should not do this. If it makes the community sad, i can (and will) delete it. It's meant for entertainment pourpose, and a reaction to various user pages (which scroll graphics anyway). The text labels on them include much worse things. Let me know if it looks unwiki. I do not agree with anyone, but of course the consensus (which is not a single individual). Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 17:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC) gone. not good for my image. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 14:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iran-Iraq UFO Sightings

I corrected your problem with placing this article on AFD. BigE1977 17:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! By the way, why do you prefer opera to firefox? Añoranza 23:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harpies

Thanks for the heads up. I will do so now.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanks

Hiding archives isn't explicitly disallowed, but it's considered extremely bad form. He's not a productive member of the community, so I don't consider that he has any claim to do as he wants with any of Wikipedia's resources, including "his" talk page. — Saxifrage ✎ 20:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yy-bo about Akidd_dublin

I have found a pointer to my previous contribution history, using the account Akidd_dublin. And remarks about fnarf999. His edit comments have been outbound of being friendly. He was right about linking to own sites. It is not allowed by policy. However, see the article Red_hair, i just removed unrelated information, a few lines about the term ginger. The result has been pages of discussion, mediation cabal about the discussion. In the follow up, he jumped into my contribution history, and edited everything possible, see matsuri. The unrelated information is gone from the article. I insist (probably he comes here) that he was not right starting to argue over my edits to the Red hair article. I just believe it is not worth to unroll it again. Probably he has improved his communications. And i will get blocked for a month: i do not believe he was right, correct english or not. He just used it as an argument.
Most bad things cause something good! I was happy about my new account id. But, are i am under obligation to say thank you to fnarf? Because he caused it indirectly? A question i do not know an answer for. User:Yy-bo 12:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Don't know if a redirect from Melting oven to Furnace is superfluous. No increased interest in the article. 3RR not argueable. User:YBO 23:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:YBO

Ah, thanks for bringing that to my attention. Since they're pretty well confined to their user talk page while blocked, it doesn't seem like a serious problem, I guess? If they start making personal attacks, legal threats, stuff like that, it may be a larger problem, but for now it seems pretty tame. Feel free to let me know if anything changes. :) Regards, Luna Santin 23:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger playing in the movie A Boy and His Dog

Hi! I just recently came across the article you've created on the Brady Bunch dog Tiger. It appears, unless I'm mistaken, that you mentioned that he/she played the dog in the movie A Boy and His Dog. From what I've gathered by research it appears Tiger died well before the movie was released. I've searched Google and have found various references that also state Tiger was played by the Brady Bunch dog, but they usually come from unreliable sources and the dates of Tigers death vs. the date of the movie airing is odd. The only explanation is that the film took a pretty long time to make (mid or late 60's to mid 70s)... and even then Tigers role would have had to be miniature since he would have died so early in the filming (I don't know, I personally haven't seen the movie yet, but from what I've read "Tiger" seemed to have a fairly big role in the film). Anyway, please reply on the discussion page for A Boy and His Dog, the discussion page for Tiger, or my talk page. Thanks. --PoeticX 08:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Orville Redenbacher.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Orville Redenbacher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Toro Logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Toro Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rexair-LLC.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rexair-LLC.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tiger (dog) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger (dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger (dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Automatic movement.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]