User talk:YBO

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YBO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sockpuppet because ID obvious from contribution history. Report on insufficient spelled Afd argumentation will be transfered to mediation immediately. This is not a blocking reason.

Decline reason:

You used this sock in the same places as your other account, even if it is generally clear to see that it is the same user it can cause confusion and block evasions.--Konstable 15:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YBO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocks that may be controversial are:
blocks of suspected "sock puppets" or "reincarnations" of banned users
blocks of logged-in users with a substantial history of valid contributions, regardless of the reasoning for the block
infinite block (IP) not appreciate.

Decline reason:

Looking at your contributions, we see you've paid a lot of attention to this other user's userpage. I'm not sure what you're up to, but please stick to one account. --Luna Santin 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Crystal 128 gadu.png Welcome, YBO!

Hello, YBO, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

File:Crystal Clear app kate.png Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

➨ ЯEDVERS 19:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the account change?

So, what's with the sudden obvious name change? --tjstrf 21:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a more strong expression. I do not utilize the other ID's for edit action. User:YBO 22:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i do not really understand this. It is too long. User_talk:Yy-bo/notaskedfor_1. It happened before to User_talk:Akidd_dublin. I do not see a meaningful article edit, just pages of nonsense-talk. This requires an enclosing statement, by the way of arbitration. Actually i am blocked to put it to arbitration, one subject a time. User:YBO 15:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

You appear to be in violation of WP:SOCK, specifically Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Avoiding_scrutiny_from_other_editors. BigE1977 22:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The interest is not legitimate. Argumentation: Talk about talk, trolling, flaming and spamming on purpose. User:YBO 22:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe he is in violation of WP:SOCK. He appears to only be changing his user name. He is linking on User:YBO to all his old subpages. He has also edited his old user page from this account. This would not appear to be the actions of someone trying to avoid scrutiny from other editors. David D. (Talk) 23:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand it would not be the actions one would expect from a user switching accounts. Possibly he will use one account for AfD purpose only and this one for editing articles? I think that is probably acceptable under WP:SOCK regulations. David D. (Talk) 23:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There have been other reasons than to superimpose a more correct english. Probably i will use Yy-bo for Afd, if it is appreciate. It is a good idea to read the policies more carefully before another bulk Afd session. User:YBO 23:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oven

Please note. If you do any further reverts to that page you will be in violation of WP:3RR. You do not need to create an article about "Melting oven". There is already an article about what you seem to be referring to. See Furnace#Metallurgical_furnaces. BigE1977 23:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I won't revert against 3RR. It is not unthinkable to redirect Melting oven to that article? Otherwise i fully agree the explanation. User:Yy-bo 23:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Category

I am confused about the category "Red-Haired Kings". While it is amusing, it seems somewhat irrelevant.Michaelbusch 02:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

email sent to admin, copy here:

The block of YBO is ignoring the information on the talk page of user YBO. A request for mediation/advocacy on Afd spelling is not possible. The goal is an enclosure statement the Afd spellings (1) and (2) are not sufficient and no good example. User Yy-bo (now YBO) has been right to ask for arbitration, because the spelling is based on personal POV, not wikipedia policy WP. The mediation/advocacy will only be about the Afd spellings (1), (2), no other subjects. If this turns out to be sufficient, there won't be additional mediation/advocacy requests, or requests for comment. This has been inserted into the user talk of YBO (email sent).

I want to use this account. It is unfortunate to have it labelled a puppet. User:YBO 15:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway i will file arbitration (for the Afd spelling (1), (2) of a defined user, as soon as possible. User:YBO 15:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am defintively not a girl (whatever song titles) 1

I am now using this so-called sock, to try around with the usage of english language, especially british english.
favour (british), color (american) ? I don't know, but usually they use color, not colour. I am not even sure about this.

I am defintively not a girl (whatever song titles) 2

User:Yy-bo/AFD_save/Erlan_Alimov
Erlan_Alimov
Nikolai_Pokotylo - not deleted (probably more noteable).

Previously, i have called the thing wikipedia 1.0
However, wikipedia 2.0 is not thinkable unless it is introduced.
Addding various links, they have been considered to improve the encyclopedia, not to threaten unknown wikipedia users.
In a few cases i have restored the links, a so called revert.
It has been explained to me, adding links to own sites is called VANITY.
I do not know if i am better off to employ a commercial service, which is ruled by economy and success,
not by wrestling with invisible minor age young adults.
At least i have spent 20 or 30 hours with long discussions.
However, i have not been situated to accept defeat (removal of articles).
The result is an infinite IP block.
Wikipedia, especially after cleaning the user box system, is still considered an interesting project by me.
However, it is neither a hobby, nor a matter to profile personally.
If my external links are explored, this is good. They have not been included to be used
for argumentation about my personality within technical discussion.
Indeed i am very afraid of personal statements, to call names, id's, for instance while using a weblog.
The same thing is expected in return.
If the level of my english is continutated called insufficient, i must refrain from more suchlike practice.
But guess, without reference to usage of weak english by others, the events are caused by:
Being upset with the personal details found into my various external site.
I wrote about it (without using the word wikipedia) using YAHOO 360 weblog.
It is like country music compilations:

2 songs are good
3 other songs are noteable
the 45 others are not played very much

Don't you agree.
I will continue to write nonsense into my weblog, without getting personal, primitive and not to provide a constructive solution.
Wikipedia 1.0 has become Wikipedia 1.1 (new userboxes).
However, the policies are too much used for the sake of it.

Articles are too long.
They are pretty much written from one point of view, once they obtained a certain length, they can not be edited anymore (without pre-requisite like external chat)
Spin-offs are not tolerated. Have a look a real shop: There are twenty books about mathematics. The customer has the choice. Not everyone wants formula scrolling.
Link policies are unrealistic strict.
Vanity guidelines are not applied narrow enough. Lots of articles are in the need to be outsourced (WikiRecords, WikiMovies, WikiPeople etc.) - Only major records, films, people are encyclopedic

It is not/It has not been possible to discuss these matters with, at times, sorry, community members with babaric and rude manners.

Guess the english might be a bit fallacious, but language barrier? It is insulting, somehow.

Hope this gets unblocked, and this gets read. If you do not understand it, then i don't mind, i believe it to be understandable.

I am not from russia.

Result on Cocacolonisation

Talk:Cocacolonization - not encyclopedic as it looks, transfered to wiktionary (however they had an entry for it long ago). I have been discredited heavily by attacking the article back then. (User:Akidd_dublin - Argumentation was: I would only have nominated it in a harrassing return of the deletion of Ghey. I feel being obfuscated with loads of confusion, just because i have clue enough to contest dubious articles. These are not long articls, if the author asks me to keep the article. But tiny, annoying, unncessary articles. However, i must spell a sufficient Afd nomination, based on Polices, i must include links to the polices. And i must not refer to identities which do not exist, maybe only in a personal perception, maybe Cocacolonisation is as noteable as History_of_CocaCola_labels, already covered by Coca_Cola and Label. Note this is not a sufficient Afd nomination, and must be contested.

Result

Article gone, transwikified, already has been a wiktionary entry. By the way i categorized the article to Cola, Portmanteau. If you mix Fanta and Cola, this is pretty much a fine portmanteau. I must not use this suggestion in discussion, making a choice for others, advert etc. I am so sorry for writing soo much on talk pages. User:YBO 21:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way an older version of the article has been transwikified, not the last version of the article. The transfered version uses giant instead of multinational concern. Interesting edit history. User:YBO 21:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Search results for ghey

At the time of deletion review: 416,000
Right now: 687,000

I fully understand it is only an internet phenomena, gaming slang, and there is not encyclopedic ghey culture, like ghey advertsing (adverts for products which are not really required). Even if so, i understand, it is a dictionary definition, at least for now. User:Yy-bo 21:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned wikipedia into one of my weblog/BBS

http://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-orlfv9I_cq041W.Y7BWIIjw1PTo-?cq=1&p=43

hope you consider it:

professional
suitable for the image of wikipedia

The post is about a Kazachstan TV SHOW pop-music contest, link found on wikipedia.

User:Yy-bo 21:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO TEENIE BOPPERS ALLOWED

SAVE THE NET FROM TEENIE BOPPERS
TEENIE BOPPERS ARE A GREAT DANGERS
TEENIE BOPPERS, NOT THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE

american slang expression directed at pop-up adverts.

External link

http://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-orlfv9I_cq041W.Y7BWIIjw1PTo-?cq=1&p=45