User talk:Bidhan Singh

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bidhan Singh! Thank you for your contributions. I am DRAGON BOOSTER and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 10:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to List of people from Bihar have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And never including insults about living people, like you just did ("wannabe"). Qwyrxian (talk) 06:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Living famous Indian Youth

Hello Bidhan Singh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Living famous Indian Youth for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, →Σ σ ς. (Sigma) 00:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of living great people

Hello Bidhan Singh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of living great people for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, →Σ σ ς. (Sigma) 00:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List : Great people

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List : Great people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Mr X 03:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List : famous Youth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List : famous Youth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Mr X 03:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List : famous Indian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List : famous Indian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 04:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

You have created several new list articles, some of which have been deleted and some of which will probably soon be deleted because they do not meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards.

Some of these lists lack notability. Please see WP:LISTN for the applicable guidelines. A list article should not be created unless the group referred to in the list is notable and that notability can be cited with reliable sources. Generally, if there is not an article on the subject, a list on the same subject should not be created. - Mr X 04:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List : famous Rajput

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List : famous Rajput. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Rajputs. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Rajputs – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of living famous Rajput

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of living famous Rajput. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Rajputs. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Rajputs – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User page categories

Hi Bidhan Singh. I removed the categories from your userpage. We actually have a separate category system for Wikipedia users than for articles. The categories that I think you want are [[Category:Wikipedians in India]] or [[Category:Indian Wikipedians]] You're welcome to use those; also, if you go to those category pages, you'll see that you can also use userboxes (which are decorative elements for user pages) that will automatically categorize you. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Abhishek191288. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Barkha Dutt because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Abhishek ^Talk 03:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Preity Zinta with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Make cat 04:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Preity Zinta with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Make cat 04:59, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bidhan Singh concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bidhan Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bihar

List of people from Bihar is not only for people still alive--the list is for any person who is currently or who has in the past lived in Bihar (though usually they need to have either been born there or lived there for a substantial/important amount of time). There is no requirement that the people still be alive.

Additionally, we never describe people as "late"--that's a euphemism. When needed, we would say that someone "died" or "is dead". But in a list like that one, we don't need it at all. The whole point of having a hyperlinked encyclopedia is that anyone who is interested in finding out more information about a given person can click on the link. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Uncletomwood. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Uncletomwood (talk) 07:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political organisation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Campaign and Interest groups (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Superpower

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Superpower with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 13:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! BigDwiki (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook linking

Please stop adding your Facebook link to articles - it is considered spamming and will ultimately result in a block of your account if it continues. You have many notes and warnings on this page; I suggest you read through them and follow the links provided in order to have a better understanding of the various Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeatedly adding spam links to pages, and creating pages that very much don't conform to WP policies. I don't think that you understand what Wikipedia is or how it works. Looking back through your contributions, I don't see any that are helpful (though I admit to not having checked all of them). Please read through the numerous policy links that have been given to you. You may even want to consider getting a mentor after your block expires. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Bidhan Singh

Hello Bidhan Singh. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Bidhan Singh.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bidhan Singh}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at mass media

Please stop making the same changes to mass media. There are many problems with the changes that you aren't addressing each time you put them back. First and foremost, there is no consensus to define "mass media" as "media process." Several of the statements contain spelling and grammatical errors to the extent that they are difficult to understand, but most importantly, significant changes to the meaning of an article require (a) citing sources that back up what you're writing and (b) using the talk page to discuss the changes first (otherwise they will continue being reverted). I believe you have the best intentions to improve Wikipedia, but please work on the talk page to explain what you feel should change and why. Repeatedly restoring the same contentious information often results in being blocked from editing. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 04:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass media edits

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. The changes you are making across various articles are at best misguided, and at worst detrimental, as the additions and grammar changes add misleading and factually incorrect information to this encyclopedia. In a collaborative environment such as Wikipedia it is essential that you communicate with your fellow editors, yet the disruption continues unabated with no indication from you that you understand why your edits are being reverted or assurances that you will stop. The block is of an indefinite duration, that is you are blocked until 1) you acknowledge that you are aware that there are serious concerns with regard to your edits and 2) you explain how you will address those same concerns if you were to be unblocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bidhan Singh

A tag has been placed on User:Bidhan Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheWin RatHere! 16:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bidhan Singh

A tag has been placed on User:Bidhan Singh, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheWin RatHere! 16:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]