User talk:Bidgee/Archive 19

Archive 15

←

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

→

Archive 25

Welcome back!

Bidgee, let me please just start off by apologizing to you for the dispute. It was not how I or others wanted things to go. But it did go that way, and I regret that and therefore I apologize. Im sorry Bidgee. Im sorry again, for bringing this up... Anyway I would just like to welcome you back to Wikipedia after your break. I hope that we all can work together on different things etc. It will Be great having you back...ironic me saying this, yes...but WP is a better place with you and your contributions. I hope we can all move on, as that is the right thing to do.

Welcome Back Bidgee! -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 09:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I like to leave it in the past and move forward to the future. Few things just happen at once and just snapped, I do a apologise for the way I acted towards you, it was totally uncalled for. Almost didn't return but want to help out another editor but I wont be as active as I use to be. Thank you for the apology and welcome back. :) Bidgee (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Bidgee ;) -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 08:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Museums

G'day Bidgee! Thanks for the work you did on Aviation Heritage Museum. Your expertise in these things has helped get the new article up and running.

There appears to be no article about the excellent Fleet Air Arm Museum at HMAS Albatross, Nowra. I am willing to start one but there will need to be an early decision about what to call it. For about 5 years this Museum was called Australia's Museum of Flight but in 2006 it reverted to Fleet Air Arm Museum - see Fleet Air Arm Museum History. There is already an article called Fleet Air Arm Museum about the RN Museum in Yeovil, UK. What suggestion can you make about a title for a new article - perhaps Fleet Air Arm Museum (Australia)? Cheers. Dolphin (t) 22:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. :)

Fleet Air Arm Museum is the common and current name. Best to start the lead something on the lines with "Fleet Air Arm Museum (formerly known as Australia's Museum of Flight) is a military museum located at HMAS Albatross in Nowra, New South Wales....." with the name of the article Fleet Air Arm Museum (Australia) is the best with a link on the top of the Fleet Air Arm Museum article (by using one of these templates). Bidgee (talk) 11:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Good suggestions. I will take up your ideas. Thanks very much. Dolphin (t) 11:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Fleet Air Arm Museum (Australia) is now live. Thanks for your help. Dolphin (t) 04:05, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Williams

Hi Bidgee, thanks for the referencing. I was doing the high volume of new article creations in a circut with referencing done last until something distracted me and I had to stop until now. Thanks again! Романов (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem, I didn't want to see the time wasted if it had of been deleted. Bidgee (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Origin Energy logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Origin Energy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Reply

G'day; I was actually just in the process of posting comments on the talk page when I got your request. I would have already posted them except for some edit conflicts :-) YSSYguy (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I thought your third party opinion was needed. I didn't know that I had breached the 3RR until I got a comment from another editor but just got a little angry to the fact that Tuddy didn't seem to listen what I was saying. Bidgee (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

No worries - easy enough to do: a bit of to-and-fro, a few clicks of a mouse, a bit of typing and Presto! you're in an edit war :-) YSSYguy (talk) 09:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Virgin Australia

Good-oh, I was just about to do that but you beat me to it - I'm suffering very slow internet speeds at the moment. YSSYguy (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I think Wiki is running a little so too ATM, could be my ISP having overseas bandwith issues again. Thought it would be pointless to delete the article then redirecting then only to delete the page so we could move the article if the renaming occurs, so I followed on Mjroot's reply/suggestion on your talk page. Bidgee (talk) 10:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Wagga Wagga Airport

Bidgee, the edits to the page were done in consideration of what was mentioned on the talk page. The talk page for the article was used, and no mention or response was made to my final proposal for the page, a proposal where clear photos and information relating to the present nature of the airport and its terminal, thus allowing me to assume that you were in concordance with my views. It is clear that this is not the case, and you instead wish to have the article consist of purely your own images and other basic information. Tuddy (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Really? You seemed to have ignored what YSSYguy has stated "Second, the images are poorly composed.", you have ignored what I have stated about Virgin Blue, WP:NOTGALLERY, content about the terminal and the poor quality of the photographs. Your comment on the talk page was not a "proposal". Bidgee (talk) 09:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refer to the talk page. It is a sad state of affairs, as it appears you are ignoring the most recent edit, and are instead referring to previous edits. There are only two more images in the most recent edit than your own previously editted page. Virgin Blue was not in the most recent edit. The terminal content is relevant. However, I guess it's each to their own and it may not be deemd acceptable to edit the page solely containing someone else's images Tuddy (talk) 09:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

No you have ignored both YSSguy and myself. Bidgee (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)