User talk:Tuddy

Image tagging for Image:Broadway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Broadway.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Davis Jones for Cairns Central

Greetings, I see that you have added some info about David Jones moving into Cairns Central by 2010. Could I ask you to cite your source on the page? I simply ask this because it would be really intesting to see where the info came from :-) - Fosnez 01:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Port Central

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Port Central, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ajdlinux 09:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, removing those tags and replacing it with a highly POV, unsourced article isn't acceptable. I have reverted the changes. (JFTR: I have lived in Port Macquarie for almost 10 years now, and I think it isn't notable.) ajdlinux 10:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you appear to object, I replaced the prod tag with a full AfD tag. ajdlinux 10:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: New Northern Line

From here - the NSW State Plan launched in 2006. Of course I have coloured in the line and added some station names to it. --Pikablu0530 06:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Great work in creating the pages for the remaining three stations for the NWRL! Thanks! --Pikablu0530 06:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rouse Hill Town Centre

Hi,

I've seen your edits on Rouse Hill Town Centre recently.

I know you're well intentioned, but you need to remember Wikipedia:Notability, WP:NPOV and Wikipedia:Copyright. As you've been reminded before, you MUST have a fair-use rationale on all non-free images.

Unfortunately I don't have the knowledge to fix the articles and photos, but I hope you take this into consideration in later edits. ajdlinux | user page | talk | contrib 10:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DB tag

A tag has been placed on Rouse Hill Town Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --El on ka 20:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RouseHill1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RouseHill1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RouseHill2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RouseHill2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RouseHill3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RouseHill3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westfield Burwood

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Westfield Burwood. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michellecrisp (talk • contribs)

False image licensing

Please consider this your first and only warning: if you continue to upload images under false licenses, you will be blocked from editing. It is entirely unacceptable to take copyrighted works and claim them as your own under a false license. If you did not do so intentionally, and instead simply don't understand Wikipedia policy, I ask you to promptly read Wikipedia:Image use policy. I've deleted the images you've uploaded. Thanks,--cj | talk 05:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Supabarn canberra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supabarn canberra.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Supabarn canberra.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Supabarn canberra.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ugen64 01:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Macquarie Park Station

Apologies for the delayed reply. The photo was taken during Morris Iemma's visit to Macquarie Park station that was reported on the news (SMH i think) a few weeks ago. Other photos are available at this location: http://s7.photobucket.com/albums/y286/kakamesh It was stated by the owner of the album that the photos were released on Morris Iemma's facebook. However this is yet to be verified. Pikablu0530 13:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Macquarie University's website, "Macquarie University train station is due for completion in June 2008". As for access to the station directly from Macquarie Centre, I'm not quite sure about this but very early on back in around 2000 it was said that there will be direct access from the shopping centre, but things change rapidly and I havn't seen any construction within Macquarie Centre that looks like a connection to the station, but I might be wrong. --Pikablu0530 14:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, more pictures here: http://www.tidc.nsw.gov.au/Documents/1296_pres.pdf. Also some sort of milestones for AW Edwards for the ECRL can be found at [1] --Pikablu0530 14:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Supabarn

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Supabarn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. L337 kybldmstr 10:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Supabarn

Supabarn, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Supabarn satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supabarn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Supabarn during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. L337 kybldmstr 07:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of David Jones stores

List of David Jones stores, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of David Jones stores satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of David Jones stores and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of David Jones stores during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jmlk 1 7 06:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart International Airport

Hello Tuddy, I have noticed that you've added the section in relation to pacific blue flying - hobart to Auckland from 2009. Do you by any chance have a reference to add? have tried looking myself on google, with little luck. Cheers, Wiki ian 12:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the virgin info. Would be good if you read Wikipedia:No original research before adding info of this nature in the future. Kind regards, Wiki ian 17:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Westfield Bay City

When moving the page, use the 'move' button at the top rather than copy and paste the contents. That way the page history is kept - at present Westfield Geelong says you created the entire page. It's a first timer's mistake - I did it once before as well. ;-) Wongm (talk) 11:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Circular Quay stn.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Circular Quay stn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northland Shopping Centre

For the images, you really need to pick the correct licence for them, as listed in the upload form dropdown bit. Since they were posed on the forums, if the photos were actually taken by 'x' user, then get them to say you have permission to upload them or something. Wongm (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Northland_interior_1.jpg has the http://adonline.id.au watermark on it - you will have to find out if he is happy for it to be used. Wongm (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Dimech here (owner of www.adonline.id.au). I AM NOT happy for the image to be used. DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam-dimech (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Northland interior 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Northland interior 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Northland interior 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Northland interior 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my images

I am the owner of numerous shopping centre photos that you've stolen from www.adonline.id.au. DELETE THEM IMMEDIATELY. Their use is an infringement of copyright.

Furthermore, you should know better than to say you used the photos with permission when you didn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam-dimech (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

If you continue to introduce copyright problems into Wikipedia, then you are going to be blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Tamworth Airport, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very few newspapers are not available somewhere these days. Any idea of which newspaper and the approximate period of time? Orderinchaos 10:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Myer-dubbo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Myer-dubbo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement [dubbo.yourguide.com.au/news/local/news/general/selling-up/1236460.aspx]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Myer-dubbo.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 02:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Westfield Braopdford

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Westfield Braopdford, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Westfield Braopdford is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Westfield Braopdford, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Wagga Wagga Airport, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Albury Airport has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Alburyairport3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alburyairport3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Alburyairport12.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alburyairport12.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Alburyairport13.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alburyairport13.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bayside Shopping Centre

Hello Tuddy, I see that you have contributed to the Bayside Shopping Centre redirect... I was wondering how that redirect can be removed because I have just created a 'Bayside Shopping Centre' article and it is ready to go on live....except that redirect is the only thing that stands in the way. can you please assist me in any way possible? Thankyou! MelbourneStar1 (talk) 06:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I have taken the redirect off the article --- I have done major edits to the article. I really really hope you like it, it took me ages...I just think because it is the largest in the Mornington Peninsula...it hink it deserves its own article...and it has finally got one! :)

Thankyou. If there is anything you would like to discuss with me, feel free to discuss on my talk page :) MelbourneStar1 (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I have just had a look at the discussion page for the article ---and im like stressing now :S it says it was nominated for deletion! What am I going to do?! I have worked so hard to make this article work out :S I really want this to work out...

Please HELP me! can you please help me????? MelbourneStar1 (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) Hey MelbourneStar1. So sorry...haven't been on wikipedia for the last week or so. I jsut had a squiz and it doesn't seem to be an article for deletion. Must say, you've done the page justice. Nice work. (talk)[reply]

Thankyou Tuddy! :) I am doing my best :) MelbourneStar1 (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wagga Wagga Airport. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Wagga Wagga Airport. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wagga Wagga Airport. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Central Square, Ballarat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Square, Ballarat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Square, Ballarat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]