User talk:Bhavyar19

April 2020

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Circle—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not constructive? Bhavyar19 (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why can circle not have 100°? Bhavyar19 (talk) 18:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why does circle have to have exactly 360°? Bhavyar19 (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why not have more total number of degrees like 500° which will be a nice round figure? Bhavyar19 (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:360 degrees (disambiguation) for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parent, you may be blocked from editing. PATH SLOPU 12:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fences&Windows 12:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parent. PATH SLOPU 12:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fences&Windows 12:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 09:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why can a circle not have 120°? Bhavyar19 (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]