User talk:Bhattarai1237

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Namaste, Bhattarai1237! You are cordially invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:

{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~

Thanks.

Nepal knowledge (talk) 05:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bhattarai1237, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chitwan district did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. RegentsPark (comment) 21:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kangchenjunga. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
The ratings are decided by the relevant wikiproject, not an editor with less than a days edits in their edit history - Arjayay (talk) 09:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kangchenjunga, you may be blocked from editing.
STOP altering project categorizations - as already explained above - Arjayay (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Gotitbro (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I vandalize Wikipedia? Instead you are reverting my edits without any reliable reason. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 03:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhattarai1237, you have been edit warring your version into the article. You must go to the article's talk page and explain why you are making the edits you are, or what you feel needs to be changed about the article. Per the warning below, you could be blocked from editing if you continue to insist on your own version and do not discuss the issues. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhattarai1237, you also deleted a significant portion of KP Sharma Oli without giving reason. I have reverted it for now. Please do not repeat as you may get blocked. nirmal (talk) 08:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 03:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valmiki Ashram (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was:

I can imagine this becoming an article. But it needs to be written following the sources, and remaining mindful of the mythology-history distinction. Do not present speculations/conjectures based on mythology as truths in wikivoice. And the text needs to be substantial enough to provide sufficient context to establish the notability of the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valmiki Ashram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Valmiki Ashram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bhattarai1237! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhattarai1237. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see you'd posted to my talk page about a draft. I don't know your history and so I can't know whether you've been using socks for deceptive purposes all along, or ended up getting blocked for one reason somewhere and decided to create a bunch of accounts to prevent yourself being stopped. In either case, being blocked for any reason (socking or disruptive editing or whatever) doesn't have to be the end of the world. Indefinite block does not mean infinite block. You should make an unblock request through this account (or identifying yourself as this account if you can no longer access this one), identifying all your socks, blocked and otherwise, and showing an understanding of why you were blocked and what you will change going forward to become a net positive to Wikipedia. I hope you'll choose to do so; as one of the few Nepali editors who doesn't seem to be here to write about themselves or their company and leave, Wikipedia could benefit from your contributions if you addressed the issues with your previous editing (it is extremely easy to get stuck into the block cycle as a new editor). Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhattarai1237 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I started to edit Wikipedia articles about 2 months ago. I was totally unknown about the Wikipedia policies. And I used to believe that anyone can edit anything in Wikipedia. But I didn't know adding reference to verify the edits. Then I got involved in edit war and then got blocked for vandalism temporarily (with expiry date). I started understanding few Wikipedia policies and then thought to continue editing Wikipedia. And unknown to Sockpuppet policy, I created new account thinking that I wouldn't involve in vandalism. But I again got blocked for Sockpuppetry. I recovered my another Wikipedia account from gmail which I even didn't know why I created it in past. But it was also blocked for Sockpuppetry. I want to keep on editing Wikipedia for good. So,I request to unblock this account. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 12:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think you started to edit Wikipedia much longer than a few months ago. See, for example, Nisheshbhattarai99 (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Holy Vision Public School

Hello, Bhattarai1237. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holy Vision Public School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]