User talk:Best in the world 56

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Thala 54 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thala 54 was changed by Best in the world 56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85848 on 2013-06-24T03:05:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mallu Singh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Best in the world 56, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Best in the world 56! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Labels for eras of actor's career

Thanks for edits like this. When you're removing those sorts of notes, probably a good idea to remove the parentheses also, for example, [1]. Even more than the general concern of WP:OR, I asked about this exact type of header at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Section-headings for stages of career and got strong support for removing them in some cases. DMacks (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA reasssessment

Kamal Haasan is currently undergoing a GA reassessment. Care to give any improvement suggestions on the reassessment page? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Best_in_the_world_56 reported by User:Visuunome (Result: ). Thank you. Visuunome 06:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visuunome (talk • contribs)

Went through those pages. Still cant understand what mistake I commited. Btw, can you tell which was the bad words I posted in your talk page? Thank You Sriram Vikram (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thats what I.m asking about. Would you bother to tell me my mistake clearly. Coz as I said earlier, I dont find anything wrong in my edits. Thank You. Sriram Vikram (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, its not taken from a single source. There are some illegal websites hosting copyrighted content. So i dint want to use them as sources. http://www.raaga.com/channels/tamil/movie/T0000206.html, http://www.raaga.com/channels/tamil/movie/T0000206.html

Thank YouSriram Vikram (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The runtime was taken from this source... http://shakthi.fm/ta/album/show/dfb4c2a6 Thank you Sriram Vikram (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I havent seen any movie for which sources have been cited for tracklistings... The tracklist isnt my personal opinion. Its a fact, known and accepted by everyone. If you still want me to add sources, you could have put a 'citation needed' tag next to it. Sriram Vikram (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mealwaysrockz007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JK (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]