User talk:Bernice2019

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bernice2019! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 09:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Damola Ayegbayo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damola Ayegbayo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damola Ayegbayo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 11:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Damola Ayegbayo

Hi @Bernice2019: I think Damola Ayegbayo will have an article on here eventually. If any of paintings end up in notable museums or make it into an international exhibition which is recognised as such, then that would indicative that he is notable. His work of such stellar quality, that its only matter of time before he has an article. scope_creep^Talk 23:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep#top I really appreciate your reaching out, but what you just highlighted that if his works happen to be in a notable Museum or international exhibition then he is notable, Kindly see Vanguard (Nigeria) is a credible and reliable source [1], he has his work in The Museum of Modern Art and Yemisi Shyllon Museum of Art. Wanted to provide this source before it was deleted.Bernice2019 (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bernice2019: That is a excellent start. I'm trying to search for more refs. scope_creep^Talk 22:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep Kindly see this also [2][3][4][5][6]. He is notable but didn't provide all these source initially part of the reason I made it a stub so anyone can improve on it , I guess that why you norminated it. Sincerely I really appreciate you reaching back to me, it shows you are noble. Thank you Bernice2019 (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fela Akinse moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fela Akinse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Damola Ayegbayo (Artist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Damola Ayegbayo (Artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A01:4C8:B3:B050:ECE4:8F4:E646:A246 (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G4 denied. Article moved to appropriate title. AFD initiated (see below). - UtherSRG (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Damola Ayegbayo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damola Ayegbayo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damola Ayegbayo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 01:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Princek2019 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Princek2019. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 23:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bernice2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't awear my editing patterns was against the policy, I really love to edit here and I promised won't act in such case again, please kindly unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.