User talk:Bernardogaivao
Speedy deletion nomination of Pordata
A tag has been placed on Pordata, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kudpung (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pordata, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
We don't usually like people who have close connections to the subject of an article to write it. The best editor of an article is an outsider, who has a little more objectivity and is more likely to be able to write it from a neutral point of view. Why not ask a friend who doesn't know a thing about your company to research it and rewrite the article based on how he, as an outsider, views your company? You might end up with a higher-quality article on it. -- Denelson83 05:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)