User talk:Berdmorei

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Kung Hibbe per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kung Hibbe. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berdmorei (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I know you will believe I am lying so how can I prove it is only a coincidence my edits are similar to Kung Hibbe's? Berdmorei (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kung Hibbe/Archive and isn't in doubt. Yamla (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed? Because our edits are similar? It must not mean we are the same person. Berdmorei (talk) 10:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must unblock me due to lack of evidence. Berdmorei (talk) 23:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In which way is it "confirmed", Yamla? Berdmorei (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Berdmorei (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You believe I am a sockpuppet because our edits are similar but it is not enough evidence. Berdmorei (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning behavior is not the only evidence. But behavior is enough, see WP:MEAT. Arguing process is not a denial. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.