User talk:Benkta

Arbitration Enforcement

See WP:AE for the section I've started about your editing at Talk:Waterboarding. Jehochman ^Talk 19:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waterboarding

Please read Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding#Remedies. If you persist in conduct at Waterboarding and/or Talk:Waterboarding that is deemed to be uncivil, a personal attack or an assumption of bad faith directed at another editor, then you you may be blocked from editing at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Please comment on the issues on the talk page and not on other editors. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a request for comment, and I added a relevant comment. The (mis)behavior of editors who are keeping the article from developing is relevant to the conversation, as is the form of the article and evaluations of the sources used to justify claims. I'd believe in your sincerity more if you as loudly decried the largest assumption of bad faith, that I'm someone's sockpuppet, or equally scrutinised clearer incivilities / personal attacks / non-constructive comments such as [1] and [2]. Or if you hadn't called me POV-pusher. Benkta (talk) 00:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating a single purpose, disruptive account. It is clear that this account's purpose is picking up old battles. Indefinitely blocked on that basis. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.