User talk:Benchwarming

Benchwarming, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Benchwarming! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Benchwarming. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Hourihane listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elizabeth Hourihane. Since you had some involvement with the Elizabeth Hourihane redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zappone v. Revenue Commissioners

Hi. When you created Zappone v. Revenue Commissioners back in 2015, why did you omit Ann Louise Gilligan's name from the article title? Was it a simple omission or did you have a strong reason for it? I seems to wipe ALG from the history in many ways. I understand that KZ was the more high-profile of the two, but I don't see any rationale for not following the actual case naming Zappone & Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners. Are you ok if I move it? Fob.schools (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]