User talk:Beltlyre

Welcome!

Hi Beltlyre! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 17:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nora Fussner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nora Fussner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora Fussner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kj cheetham (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Beltlyre. Thank you for your work on Margo Steines. Another editor, Asparagusus, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very good!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Asparagusus}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 15:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author/Book Notability

Hi, Beltlyre! I wanted to let you know that I reviewed your article on Rachel Morgan and moved it to be an article about her book, Sins of the Shovel, instead. Typically, for an author to be wiki-notable for their own article, we expect to see multiple notable books. If the person has biographical coverage for reasons unrelated to the book, that can make them wiki-notable through the WP:NBIO criteria, but one book isn't enough for the WP:NAUTHOR criteria. More broadly I'd encourage you to start with book articles first when an author only has one. Regardless, thanks for your contributions!

Also, you might be interested in the current Women in Red event focused on women writers and their books! More info here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

new york times says she is notable, and they buy ink by the barrel. --Beltlyre (talk) 18:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel Morgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Morgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 21:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Helena Kelly

Hello, Beltlyre,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wolverine XI, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Helena Kelly, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wolverine XI}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mary Haverstick

Hello, Beltlyre,

Thank you for creating Mary Haverstick.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It will be helpful to include additional text in the two sections of the article, as bullet lists alone do not provide context or meaning for a reader.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helena Kelly moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Helena Kelly. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and most sources support notability of the Austen biography, not Kelly herself.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]