User talk:Bellstran
Welcome
[edit]
|
May 2020
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mildred Funnell, from its old location at User:Bellstran/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Funnell (May 27)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mildred Funnell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mildred Funnell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Bellstran!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
|
June 2020
[edit]Hello Bellstran. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bellstran. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bellstran|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your single purpose appears to be promoting University of Maryland Libraries. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:56, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Magnolia677. Bellstran is editing in accordance with GLAM-Wiki. Many GLAM professionals and WIkipedians-in-residence work to improve WIkipedia using their organizations' resources, as this user is doing. University of Maryland Libraries is active in GLAM-Wiki and has hosted edit-a-thons and editing events aimed at encouraging students and faculty to engage with Wikipedia. A similar practice can be seen on the Smithsonian's GLAM project page which lists employees working to improve Wikipedia using the Institution's own resources. Bellstran is also editing in compliance with COI: GLAM which states:
- Museum curators, librarians, archivists, and similar are encouraged to help improve Wikipedia, or to share their information in the form of links to their resources. If a link cannot be used as a reliable source, it may be placed under further reading or external links if it complies with the external links guideline.
- Since the user is engaging as part of GLAM-wiki, which allows staff from galleries, libraries, museums and archives to edit and share resources, than the user should not be considered a traditional paid editor working for a for-profit entity like those who would typically require disclosure or the tag of 'black hat editor'.-Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Bellstran
Thank you for creating Roy W. Simonson.
User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for this new article on a notable scientist. Consider adding ISBNs and publication info to the books for verification - you can use the {{cite book}} template for this - and try to introduce links to this article where appropriate so that it is not orphaned.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
{{Re|Spicy}} Hello and thank you so much for reviewing my created page. I did not know there was a specific way to link books, I will remember this in the future and fix other pages where I listed books. Thank you for your help! I am new to editing and am eager to learn ~~~~
Spicy (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've just seen the COI notice above. It would be appreciated if you could respond to that. While you have created numerous articles on encyclopedic subjects, which are appreciated, it's considered poor form to add links to the same website to numerous articles - especially if you're affiliated with it in any way. Since you've disclosed that you're being paid by UMD on your user page, the WP:COI guidelines state that should not be adding these links directly. Instead, you should make edit requests on the talk page. Spicy (talk) 02:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
{{Re|Spicy}} Thank you for this information, I really appreciate the feedback about the talk page. ~~~~
The article Elaine J. Coates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:BEFORE shows no results.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerod Lycett (talk) 05:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Elaine Johnson Coates
[edit]Is Johnson/Coates covered in Callcott's history of UMD? It occurs to me that you likely have easy access to this book, which does not seem to be available online.
Also, you likely should have been notified of the articles for deletion discussion. I would suggest being gentle and cautious about joining in, however, as a paid editor. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Franklin Witter
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on John Franklin Witter, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.aaap.info/assets/documents/Bio%20-%20Witter%20-%20J%20Franklin.pdf. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maryland Association of Family and Consumer Sciences requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.aafcs.org/marylandfcs/aboutmafcs-page/ouraffiliate-page. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoodino (talk) 08:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello (talk) Yes, I did copy and paste the association's mission statement from their official website, but I also put the statement in quotes and cited where I was quoting it from. What should I do next time? Thanks Bellstran (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Links to archive records without digitized materials aren't very helpful
[edit]Please don't add links to archive records if they don't include materials that have been digitized or are otherwise accessible online; they aren't very helpful to readers and don't meet WP:EL. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I also brought this up as a question here to see if there is already some guidance of which I'm not aware. ElKevbo (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
ElKevbo Hello, thank you for this useful tip. I do think that linking archival materials to a wikipedia page is useful for a researcher who is doing more extensive work, but I do see your point. I will be mindful of this in the future. Bellstran (talk) 18:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- This has come up before & I agree such links are not much use. Not sure where the discussion was I'm afraid. Various archives/libraries have tried to get people to add these all over the place. If you are the sort of serious researcher who might actually want to look at archive material there are better ways of finding where it is. Many of the deposits are frankly pretty small. If every library did this.....Johnbod (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Jack Hoffenberg moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Jack Hoffenberg, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Rudy Bretz moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Rudy Bretz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Bellstran
Thank you for creating Edythe Meserand.
User:Innisfree987, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Terrific work: thank you. If I were making a wishlist, it might only be nice to also have some dates for her awards? But I imagine you’ve included everything you have. It’s a wonderful addition to the encyclopedia, thank you.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Innisfree987}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Innisfree987 (talk) 21:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bureau of Social Science Research
[edit]
Hello, Bellstran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bureau of Social Science Research".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mildred Funnell
[edit]Hello, Bellstran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mildred Funnell".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jack Hoffenberg
[edit] Hello, Bellstran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Hoffenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jack Hoffenberg
[edit]Hello, Bellstran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Hoffenberg".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rudy Bretz
[edit] Hello, Bellstran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rudy Bretz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rudy Bretz
[edit]Hello, Bellstran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rudy Bretz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Katherine Salant for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Salant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.