User talk:Bella922323

Welcome!

Hello, Bella922323, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ibeauty, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Cool Middle School"

A page you created, Cool Middle School, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Noom _talk ^stalk 17:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bella Lawrence

The article Bella Lawrence has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ∫e^b²+1_(talk) 17:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not write an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create any more test articles in main space until you have read all the instructions in the welcome message above and the deletion notices here - use your sandbox to prepare articles and publish them to main space when they are complete. Please also read WP:Guidance for younger editors. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ibeauty

A tag has been placed on Ibeauty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 17:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Learuna

A tag has been placed on Learuna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bella Leawrence

A tag has been placed on Bella Leawrence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop now

Hi Bella. I made a request earlier - didn't you read it? It went like this:

Please don't create any more test articles in main space until you have read all the instructions in the welcome message above and the deletion notices here - use your sandbox to prepare articles and publish them to main space when they are complete. Please also read WP:Guidance for younger editors. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask.

I'm asking you one last time to stop writing articles about yourself. Also, your English is way below standard for encyclopedic articles. Please stop now, because if you don't, I'll have to consider blocking your account so that you can't continue to experiment in our our main pages. You can practice all you want in your User:Bella922323/sandbox, or even make a User page for yourself, but you will still not be allowed to write about yourself on the main pages. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kudpung. I noticed that you made a change to an article, March 2004, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. THIS IS NOW AN OFFICIAL WARNING. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Book:Key Wikipedia Policies & Guidelines. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Bella922323/Ibeauty has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ibeauty, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ibeauty.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE _GROOVES 19:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Bella, Wikipedia is not a site like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves and their friends. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia; also, it is important that you should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, especially the section headed "Your safety and security".

Wikipedia is not for the sort of edits you have been making, and if you continue you may be blocked from editing for your own protection. JohnCD (talk) 23:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

12 August

You have been previously warned not to create articles that would normally quailify for deletion. Again, please stop or else you may be blocked from editing. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

Speedy deletion nomination of Bella Leawrence

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. BusterD (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seasons_finale

Hello Bella922323,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seasons_finale for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DELETION of WARNINGS

Bella, you are free to remove warnings from your talk page, because we will assume you have read and understood them. They are still visible in the page history and other editors will check for them.

I realise that you probably don't understand that you are doing anything wrong with your edits, but please note that the last official warning you removed was a FINAL WARNIING. We've given you far more friendly warnings and advice than we usually give to young editors, but please stop now because your next inappropriate edit or page creation will result in you being blocked. I'm sorry about this, but that's the way it goes here if you won't respond or ask for help. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to project pages such as WP:Redirect and the Article Wizard were anything but helpful. Not all of Wikipedia revolves around you. Huon (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have recommended to Kudpung that he indefinitely blocks you from Wikipedia. Should this happen, please note that it is purely to protect the encyclopaedia, as none of your edits have come under Wikipedia policy so far, and it is not because we think you have done anything out of malice. I would strongly recommend reading Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and getting your parent or guardian to read it with you. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but despite attempts to help you and multiple warnings, you have carried on damaging Wikipedia pages. And I'm afraid there was no alternative but to block your account. The block is indefinite, but not necessarily infinite. Please have a re-read over the messages you have been given, and follow the links you were given to help you learn about creating and editing articles. And if you can convince us that you are capable and willing to edit here in a responsible manner, it may be that you can be unblocked. If there is anything you do not understand, please ask here and I or someone else will try to help. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access withdrawn=

You are blocked indefinitely among other things for persistent creation your own autobiography and other disruptive editing. You can't do that here either, so you are now no longer allowed to edit this talk page. If you wish to appeal your block, please see the page at WP:BASC. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

hey Maddie194 (talk) 21:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]