User talk:Belasted
2008 Archives |
You test my faith in WP:DTTR... I'll bet you could even find a source for that, making it verifiable, whether true or not... —Aladdin Sane (talk) 04:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a big deal. Have a trout and a nun. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Adoption indefinitely on hold
[edit]Because of my decreased activity, I have semi-retired. As a result, I suggest you obtain another adopter if you think an adoption is in your best interests. I still plan to be active, so please feel free to ask a question if you'd like. However, someone more readily available might suit your needs better. If that is the case, check out Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area or place {{subst:dated adoptme}} somewhere on your user page. Take care and happy editing. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC))
Please Post Constructively In Articles... Thank You!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Codemasters, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ChewableOJ (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Bad edit
[edit]I just rolled back this edit. You probably want to make sure that whoever used your account to make that edit does not use it again. Cheers, CWC 17:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Vodka has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 06:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. This account may have been hijacked. An e-mail has been sent to this editor explaining the situation. Other administrators are invited to help resolve this situation and restore editing privileges when deemed appropriate. Rklawton (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, this account has been hijacked. Check out its recent edits to an article talk page: [1] and [2]. Sigh. CWC 10:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Belasted (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here
Decline reason:
No grounds for unblocking provided. Hijacking does seem the most likely explanation. --jpgordon::==( o ) 02:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I didn't get hijacked. I just turned bad.
Untitled
[edit]Quixotic plea
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)
04:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)n kjbhhhhhhhhhhhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Cite error: There are <ref group=hc>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=hc}}
template (see the help page).