User talk:Beetle CT

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beetle CT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongly blocked as sock of User: Singh6 and User: Irek Biernat. Here are the proofs: *Proof 1: On November 13th 2008, I had edited wikipedia from state of Pennsylvania. (You can verify the location of the used IP through IP LookUp or any of your own sources. Singh6 had edited wikipedia 8 times on the same date and one of his edit happened within 4 minutes my edit. Irek Biernat had edited wikipedia 6 times on the same date. Since both of these respected editors have mentioned here (Irek Biernat) and here (Singh6) that they live/edit in state of California, then it proves that this Sockpuppet case is illegitimate because one editor can not travel between US-East and US-West Coasts within 4 minutes of time. Even the minimum air-travel time between these two states is 10 to 12 hours atleast (7-9 hours in Air-Travel time including plane change/minor-stay at one connecting airport + approximately 3 hours of time which always get wasted in ticketing, security, boarding and baggage claim areas etc). *Proof 2: Even the administrator User: YellowMonkey could not prove any direct link between me and one of other blocked editors, i.e. User: Singh6. *Proof 3: In addition to my Connecticut based personal IP address, I had also used shared corporate IP addresses while doing business/traveling for some time. I suspect that Irek Biernat might be using (or might have used) the same corporate IP address because he has mentioned that his employer name start with letter “A” (my last employer name also started with letter “A”). Shared IP addresses are being used by everybody who work in those companies. *Proof 4: Further Irek Biernat’s contributions do not match with mine. Irek Biernat has edited several European/Sikhism/Christianity and Poland related articles but I have edited Indian/Sikhism related articles only. *Proof 5: I am making this edit from state of Michigan. Kindly check my current IP location and compare it with today’s edit locations (IP Address locations) of User: Singh6 and User: Irek Biernat. If they are editing from state of California (as they have mentioned in their talk pages) then my wiki account got nothing to do with those respected editors and hence all these accounts should be unblocked. Regards--Beetle CT (talk) 02:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block log shows you were blocked by a checkuser, YellowMonkey (talk · contribs), and I respect his judgment in this matter and evaluation of the situation. — Cirt (talk) 20:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khalistan movement. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Goingoveredge (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to User: Goingoveredge.--Beetle CT (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on admin Utcursch has been moved

Hi, ..noticed that you endorsed this RFC. However it was accidentally filed on wrong page and now I've moved to correct page here. Also took the liberty of moving your endorsing statement to the new location; please continue to provide your feedback at the new location to help reach consensus. Regards, --Roadahead (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on user: Goingoveredge filed

Hi, you seem to have experience of the edits of user: Goingoveredge and hence thought to acquaint you of a new RFC that has been filed on him Here. Feel free to provide your input on this new RFC as well. Regards, --Roadahead (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

template

You don't need an administrator's approval when removing a template. I don't have any more authority over content then you do. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 23:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi beetle, first i would like to state that I am not trying to intimidate you or trying to accuse you in any manner and would just like to clear a nagging suspicion in my mind. You have not been active in wikipedia for about 23 days and suddenly you pop up and cast your vote in an AfD debate. I would just request you to relate (although you are perfectly free not to and may well ignore/refuse/refute my request) as to how you came to know of the AfD suddenly after a long hiatus. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 06:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. --Beetle CT (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But it seems at 01:13, 24 November 2008 YellowMonkey blocked you (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of infinite ‎with the rationale: (Abusing multiple accounts: Irek Biernat). So if your reply is true why arent you fighting the block? LegalEagle (talk) 02:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on article you were involved in AFD debate

Hi there! You had participated in the AFD on Sikh Extremism. I've had some time to look into the article and commented on the talk page here. Thanks, --RoadAhead ^=Discuss= 01:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]