User talk:Goingoveredge

previous posts are located here: [1]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Tznkai (talk) 04:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goingoveredge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The details of the edit-warring by Khalistani trolls are provided in the WP:3RR report [2]. Note that, after my 3rd revert, the subsequent reverts were undoing the vandalism of User:Roadahead rather than the content dispute of the first 3 reverts. The vandalism was the removal of "OR" tags by User:Roadahead without discussion [3]. Since vandalism reverts are not covered under WP:3RR, the reverts that involve content disputes by me amount to only 3, not more. Therefore, I did not violate 3rr rule. In case that the reviewing admin disagrees with my analysis and declines this request, I would like to request the admin to monitor edits of User:Princhest, User:Roadaheads Khalistani revisionist meatpuppet. Both these accounts (note their contribs here, and here), are WP:SPA meatpuppets consistently editing Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity in tandem to promote a fringe, revisionist agenda that involves some intense political lobbying by the revisionist trolls (see Gurmit Singh Aulakh). It is entirely likely that User:Princhest will re-appear to continue revert-warring. I suggest page protection.

Decline reason:

First off, you have in fact been edit warring even if you technically have not violated 3RR. Second, removing a tag from a page is not vandalism and should not be reverted as such. And third, you need to address your actions, not the actions of others. Take a look at out guide to requesting unblocks — Tiptoety ^talk 04:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Goingoveredge (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time. Goingoveredge (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edit

Ok, I undid the edit to your talk page, I thought I had undid that, but I guess not. If you need anything else, please let me know. TylerPuetz (^t/_c) 05:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

You were blocked just yesterday for 24 hours for edit warring on Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity‎, and yet, here you are, edit warring again. I have opened a discussion at WP:ANI. Corvus cornix_talk 07:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hours per AN/I. -- fayssal / Wiki me up® 07:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a bit unfair, given that User:Princhest, User:Roadaheads meatpuppet, just "happened" to drop by and started revert-warring in the same article, as he has done so countless times in the past, and walks away scot-free. It seems that meatpuppetry and racist trolling (as done by User:Roadahead and User:Princhest works on wikipedia provided the racist trolls are determined enough.Goingoveredge (talk) 07:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under the microscope as well. -- fayssal / Wiki me up® 08:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring

Your page is full of blocks and yet both of you are busy reverting each other. Such edit wars are not welcome on Wikipedia. There are various methods of dispute resolution available. Adopt the appropriate ones and be done with it else more and longer blocks will soon be coming — Lost^(talk) 16:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Goingoveredge_again. Corvus cornix_talk 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully...

I put considerable effort in adding the reference you keep snipping. If you think you have a legitimate concern with the material please discuss it on the talk page before you try to snip it again. Geo Swan (talk) 07:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential superpowers

Ha! You're one to talk buddy given your reputation of repeated edit warring. Please understand that you have to obtain consensus before making unilateral changes. You have just deleted sourced material and inserted your own POV. Nirvana888 (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Nirvana888 (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that my friend especially given the fact that you have already broken 3RR and engaged in disruptive edits without building any consensus whatsoever. Nirvana888 (talk) 00:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Thanks a ton for agreeing to go along on this issue. And remember; even if you think the others are inserting false information or something, raise it up with myself or another administrator. Reverting them isn't the best idea; as Nirvana888 brought up, you have a history, and sadly many administrators here won't bother to look in depth. They'll just block the person they think is to blame. If you need anything let me know, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 03:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on Ghandi

this edit [4] is substantially your 4th revert on this article in 24 hours. Please undo the reversion part.--Tznkai (talk) 20:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Comments such as "In any case, the issue is moot now that the revisionist bigot who started the edit-war stands blocked." and "Edit-war has spilled over to khalistani troll magnet article Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity." are very unhelpful. You should refactor or remove your comments.--Tznkai (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 20:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goingoveredge (talk) 22:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing information by combining it with dead links removal

Please see here. --RoadAhead ^Discuss 20:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Goingoveredge

The RfC filed on you has been closed. You may read the conclusion there. Wizardman 14:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Beetle CT has multiple ID's

He's been warned by you before and he deleted that warning!

The user names Shalimer, Ajjay and one more are the same as Beetle CT.

He is a fundamentalist Sikh extremist, hell bent on distorting facts by trying to converge moderate Islam with extremist Sikh thinking.

he's started a new ID pretending to be Polish but brought up in India ?

His log in IP (first 2 or 3 IP Octets) would indicate this, which can only be dealt with by admin.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.37 (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]