User talk:Beethoven

Please avoid posting on my talk page

Especially your warning templates. They are dumb and obnoxious. Thank you.Sonrisas1 (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beethoven, I don't usually intervene in other people's exchanges but if you check the discussion page for this article you'll see this user's demeanor is starting to become a problem. According to him or her, stating the obvious (that Cs is full of former PP and even far-right militants and sympathizers) equates to "abusing" Cs. CodeInconnu (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan Countries

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scolaire (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting three reverts

I am sorry but I have had to report you to the Admins' noticeboard for reverting my edits in Catalans three times. I will be happy to discuss in the talk page. --Hispalois (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry @Hispalois:, but I didn't revert your edits three times. As you can see, your non-controversial edits that were backed with sources are accepted in the article. Those have not been reverted. But the rest of your edits didn't improve the article, and had already been reverted by different users in the past months. Yet you still insisted on adding them, like this edit. If you still believe that your edits should be in the article, please expose your reasons in the talk page. --Beethoven (talk) 13:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, let's attempt a civilized discussion now:

I have opened a section at the Talk page to discuss the use of the term "ethnic group". Not even the book that you provide as reference uses it.
In your mass revert, you have taken away even minor language corrections, e.g. "much... symbols" --> "many... symbols". Please double check and add all non-controversial edits back.
You have also destroyed the work of @Jotamar: [1], including a "dubious" template. Please add that back as well and, if you disagree, discuss first in the Talk page.

--Hispalois (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of museums in Catalonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring again?

Given the number of warnings you've had, you should probably think twice when someone reverts one of your edits (eg. at MUME). The best policy is WP:BRD. At worst, read the reasons for the revert and address them before you try to bludgeon through your edits. Also, consider using brief comments in your edits, otherwise they can be misinterpreted as poorly-thought-out or even as vandalism. Lithopsian (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Exile Memorial Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Exile Memorial Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://patrimoni.gencat.cat/en/collection/museum-exiles. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

Wikimania
We're building something great, but..
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
A Wikibrarian's story
Bytes in brief

Please avoid posting on my talk page

Catalan Countries

Reporting three reverts

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Edit warring again?

Speedy deletion nomination of Exile Memorial Museum

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

Issue 38, January – April 2020

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

Books & Bytes – Issue 41

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

Category:Barcelona Metro line templates has been nominated for merging

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

Nomination for deletion of Template:Barcelona metro link logo

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

Books & Bytes – Issue 65