User talk:Bedford/Archive3

Origins

I'm taking pictures for Origins and relate articles.Let me know what needs to be taken.--76.231.107.110 22:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States Life Saving Station

Somebody recently created this article, and it appears this is the life saving station that came before the Andrew Broaddus, but it's hard for me to be sure. I figured I would let you know about it, as you know better than most what to do with topics like this. Thanks! Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 16:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. That should be a start. The new article isn't a bad idea, but a lot of it belonged in the Broaddus article.--Bedford 04:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Historic Landmark list

Hi. You added the cleanup-restructure tag to List of National Historic Landmarks by state, but didn't specify the problems that you see on the talk page. The reason I'm concerned is because I've already been doing some cleanup and restructuring of the list, one state at a time. Did you add the tag because of the old, messy, and incomplete structure of the list? Or is there something I could be doing in my work to better conform with Wikipedia's style standards?

(The states I've already cleaned up are DC, HI, OR, TN, and UT. I'm also working on IN, ME, and SD in a sandbox area on my user page.)

Thanks! -Ipoellet 12:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did it because the organization of the landmarks were not consistant, as some states just have an unorganized list, while others are divied by city, while others are in boxes. If you are cleaning it up, it's appreciated, but I still think the tag is needed, as it might encourage someone to help.--Bedford 15:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. I understand what your point is now, and I agree. Thanks. Ipoellet 04:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Please don't perform a "cut and paste" move. The right way to move an article is by using the "move this page" link, which preserves the edit history. I've fixed Lexington Cemetery. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More like butcher it by removing all the cleanup I did of the article.--Bedford 11:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was my mistake, I reverted to a previous version in the course of fixing the move. Thanks for your improvements to the article. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Marschall

On 29 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicola Marschall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--JayHenry 18:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 1 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Hunt Morgan Memorial, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Daniel 02:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Indiana Register of Historic Places

<SNIP>

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Indiana Register of Historic Places/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Indiana Register of Historic Places saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The Evil Spartan 17:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I feel welcomed after this? Anyway, since this was just a list, I removed anything that could reasonably be seen as a copyvio, and just have a pure list, even if it still needs some cleanup. Thank you for raping me of my lunch break.--Bedford 19:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent PRODs

Heya. When you tag an article with a prod, use {{subst:prod|reason}}. Otherwise, it doesn't turn out properly. See WP:PROD for more info. I already fixed the articles you tagged earlier. --UsaSatsui 21:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info Boxes for Indiana Covered Bridges

Thanks for updating the info boxes. I also just tried the info box generator and it works good, that is cool. Just an FYI after trying to generate a couple of other info boxes the coordinates on some bridges are not as accurate as my GPS coordinates. Just FYI..... Histrylover34 21:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'll just have to do the automated infobox piecemeal. The automated defaults to a US map, when Indiana is more useful, so we'll have to add "Location = Indiana" to all.--Bedford 01:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's "locmapin = Indiana". I should fix that in the infobox generator, once I get {{Location map}} templates in for the other state maps. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 14:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WOW - Cool index box on the pages to get to the other bridges!!!! Can I put the See also back on the pages? My goal was to have historical places within a couple of miles of each bridge so the user could discover other sites around each bridge, or do you have a better idea? Still learning, but you are the man! Histrylover34 11:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we could put back a See Also with items in the immediate vicinity, although anything already mentioned in the article, especially in the opening paragraph, should not be within the See Also. For example, if in the opening sentence we say that the covered bridge is in Turkey Run, we don't need to put Turkey Run in the see also. We also don't need to put wikilinks to the List of NRHP.--Bedford 12:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do see a problem with not listing List of Registered Historic Places in Indiana. If I do a google search on Beeson Covered Bridge I will get to the WIKI page of the bridge, but if I then want to drive to other places of interest during my travels how do I let the user to go to a list of other Parke county or state locations? Histrylover34 13:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's the reason we have categories. There is also better ways to find out, such as http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/IN/Parke/state.html Also, you won't find other places on the National Register in Indiana that does link to the main list of Indiana NRHP.--Bedford 13:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you experts are that smart, but I did not know about that link or how to get back to the List of Registered Historic Places in Indiana list from one of the bridge pages, so I would assume that other "USERS" of this site would have no clue and the easer we make it for them the more interesting we make the information. Histrylover34 13:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In any event, you need to change all those links to "List of covered bridges in Parke County" to Parke County Covered Bridges, as that's the new main article. I did it so we could get a DYK out of it.--Bedford 13:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is a DYK??? Histrylover34 13:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Did You Know", a section of the front page of Wikipedia, showing interesting tidbits on new articles to Wikipedia. I nominated it at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created_on_September_12.--Bedford 13:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; Also I just finished changing all the links to Parke County Covered Bridges. Histrylover34 13:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 16 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Parke County Covered Bridges, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 19:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MOL ME Common.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MOL ME Common.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:JTPL1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JTPL1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 00:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture myself; what additional info is needed? Maybe I shouldn't take any more pictures for Wikipedia if I have to deal with this nonsense.--Bedford 01:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MOL ME Common.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MOL ME Common.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag & Assess 2007

Quality work you're doing there, Bedford, for which many thanks! Adding task forces is completely optional but it would much appreciated if you could spare the time to add some as you go. Usually, an article belongs to a country task force as well as a theme one. An article about the United States Air Force is tagged US=yes (country) and aviation=yes (theme); an article about the Royal Navy "British=yes" and "Maritime=yes". The full list appears in Show Preview of the template. I usually ignore the Portal calls. Like I said, optional, but much appreciated :)) Keep up the good work! --ROGER DAVIES ^TALK 07:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On November 13, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Greg Ballard (mayor), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done Bedford. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was afraid my perfect record of DYKs nominations would be broken.--Bedford 03:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 18 November, 2007, a fact from the article Camp Joe Holt, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baltic vs. Balkan

Please help to keep an eye on that Baltic is not getting mixed up with Balkan in the future like happened with Momčilo Đujić. thanks!--Termer (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I must be needing more sleep to make that mistake, especially given my geographic expertise. *blushes* --Bedford (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism mishap

Hi there, In an effort to set right one editor's overzealous, but good faith attempt to stomp out vandalism, I reverted back to an intermediate version in which one editor had moved a section chronologically down a timeline into the correct place. I am now having some difficulty getting this to stick: (see [1] your revert without an edit summary.) So, sorry, but I have reverted your revert. Cheers, 71.182.215.210 (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff mayors

I would like to expand the mayors of Jeffersonville however I don't know anymore. I'll look into Bairds book. Thanks. Jahnx (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rab concentration camp

I've noticed that you've added an npov tag to Rab concentration camp. Could you explain why? Who says it's under dispute? The article doesn't even have a talk page discussion.

Many thanks. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work...

...at the assessment drive. Much appreciated. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 15:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Bedford (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment

[2] Could I get you to sign my jackboots? -Hammersoft (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you meant well, but unfree content is not allowed to exist on portals. You can see WP:NFCC for the relevant policy. Please don't re-insert unfree content into portals. Thank you! -Hammersoft (talk) 22:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Worf page

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that there was a huge amount of in-universe information in the article before. It got removed during cleanup because it was tagged with an in universe tag and plot tag. These were basically saying that fictional subjects must be primarily about real-world facts and not on in-universe data. Real world information is casting, character depiction, critical acclaim, fan reception, things like that. If the article reverts back to its state with primarily in-universe information, it will be tagged again as such. A good example of an article that was cleaned up well is Jadzia Dax, and no I wasn't the one that cleaned it up to read in an out-of-universe perspective. Just letting you know. Ejfetters (talk) 08:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 14 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indiana Central Canal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cirt (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Category for Discussion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies . This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page.
-- I. Pankonin (t/c) 23:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somethings for you ....

		Military history service award
		For tagging and assessing 1000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your fine work on 2000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Tireless Contributor's barnstar. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your excellent work on 3000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Working Man's barnstar. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your outstanding work on 4000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Barnstar of Diligence. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your work. More to follow .... :) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Bedford (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuisine of the Thirteen American Colonies

The article is actually a toned down version of a term paper for one of my master's classes in Agricultural History. It's in Chicago format right now, but I usually cite articles in a different fashion, such as in Cuisine of France. I'm not quite sure why I didn't do it that way for this article. Actually I do, because the professor for this class had a stick up her butt about citation in this format and ... well at any rate feel free to change it. If you don't I'll probably change it myself, either way it will get done. What was your thesis on? I am in the process of writing mine now.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My thesis was on John Hunt Morgan's Raid thru Indiana and Ohio. The article History of slavery in Indiana was based on one of my graduate papers like your 13 colonies one.--Bedford (talk) 08:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to both be appreciative of our country. My thesis is an attempt to theorize a national cuisine of the United States. I'm building my own historical/sociology based model at the moment to work on the hypothesis.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 08:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 20 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Louisville Legion, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--EncycloPetey (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lighten?

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Howard Steamboat Museum. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. It is not in IndiannaTableManners ^U·T·C 06:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lighten? Get a clue. WP:Louisville considers any museum in the Louisville belonging in the Category:Museums in Louisville. There is no joke, save for you thinking its a joke.--Bedford (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Carnegie Center for Art and History, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. The problem is that your category ends up in [[Category:Museums_in_Kentucky]], and Indiana Museums are not in Kentucky. You might want to create a category called [[Category:Museums in Louisville Metropolitan area]], and keep it out of the [[Category:Museums_in_Kentucky]] category. TableManners ^U·T·C 06:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I apologize if you were not joking. I think it is a misunderstanding. It's late. Fix it if the Museums in L. Metro area makes sense. Also, take a look at cleaning up the Template:Museums in Kentucky‎ TableManners ^U·T·C 06:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I was informed that my tone with you was out of line so I want to apologize. TableManners ^U·T·C 07:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on Museums_in_Louisville problem

I made an Rfc stating the problem and proposing one solution. Please take a look and submit comments or propose other solutions. Should Museums in Indiana be listed in Museums in Kentucky?. Thanks. TableManners ^U·T·C 07:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Museums_in_Kentucky classifications too course

Please take a look at Template_talk:Museums_in_Kentucky#Organization. I am seeking input on the organization of this template. The classifications are a bit too course in my view. TableManners ^U·T·C 17:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category_talk:Museums_in_Louisville (please take another look)

Could you take a look at the fifth solution Category_talk:Museums_in_Louisville? You previously supported the second solution, but you might like the fifth better. If you do not, could you comment on the fifth solution why? Thanks. TableManners ^U·T·C 04:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Louisville portal

Hi Bedford, I've left some comments for you relating to the portal peer review you set up about Portal:Louisville. Cheers, Spebi 09:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 27 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rowan County War, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dyk

On 30 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Harmony's Atheneum, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag & Assess

As you're sure now to come top, I thought you'd appreciate a $50 contribution towards celebratory beer money. After all, barnstars are all very well and good, but you can't eat or drink them! If you have a Paypal account, just email me (yes, it is enabled) with the email account associated with it and I'll sort out the transfer. If I don't speak to you before, Happy New Year! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thanks, and Happy New Year to you too.--Bedford (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how to e-mail you, but since I have my e-mail address on an userbox anyways, its palaguin@yahoo.com.--Bedford (talk) 09:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I didn't notice that! Anyhow, the money's gone so it should be in your account within an hour or so. Thanks again, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: For email, go to the person's user page and hit the "E-mail this user" button on the toolbox section at the bottom of the Wikipedia vertical box.

Got it, already used it to buy something, which I will use in an article for WikiPedia as well as my personal lvoe for the subject. Thanks again.--Bedford (talk) 09:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]