User talk:BeautifulDayToday

BeautifulDayToday, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi BeautifulDayToday!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Arbitrarily changing the links to all University of Texas articles to include the word, "The" is vandalism. Whether the word is a part of the official title or not is irrelevant. The conventional usage within the Wikipedia is to include the word in the title and to exclude it in the link. The usual search would exclude the word for most people, and to necessitate redirect pages for each case where you decide to include the word is a waste of resources. Please desist... GWFrog (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see what you mean by the link. So, it would be more appropriate to capitalize the first letter in "The" but leave it out of the link. Right?

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Texas at Arlington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HKS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BeautifulDayToday. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BeautifulDayToday. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BeautifulDayToday. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to University of Texas at Arlington?

Do you have a connection to University of Texas at Arlington? ElKevbo (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 10:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Texas at Arlington, you may be blocked from editing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what promotional or advertising material I have ever added? I would really like to know. BeautifulDayToday (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As has been pointed out at the WP:COIN thread above that you've yet to participate in and this diff: Davis worked continually to improve the quality of students, faculty, and facilities. or if you'd like to go even further back in your history see this diff. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not promotional or advertising. I have absolutely nothing to gain from this. BeautifulDayToday (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's completely promotional and non-neutral. As evidenced by the fact that multiple editors have told you this and reverted you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is, Dean Davis DID work to improve the quality of the students, faculty, and facilities. This is undeniable and extremely well-sourced. In fact, the institution very likely would not have survived but for Dean Davis. He essentially saved what became UTA.

I agree that some unsavory aspects of his character have come to light, and I have absolutely no problem with the addition of this information. It should be part of the record. However, we should not censor/remove other previously existing information that happens to be positive about a person because of the existence of something negative. BeautifulDayToday (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good for Davis, but we don't allow puffery. Also please, enlighten us all as to how you know the university's preferences? PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not puffery, it is part of the historical record. I refer you to additional information. Please see "Transitions A Centennial History of The University of Texas at Arlington 1895 - 1995" by the highly respected Gerald D. Saxon. Read chapter 5 that starts on page 53. Evidence of Davis' contributions is all right there. Published and documented by a highly regarded professor and UTA librarian. If you don't have the book at your finger-tips, I invite you to read a copy at the UTA Library. BeautifulDayToday (talk) 14:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me also refer to another published book, "University of Texas at Arlington" by Evelyn Barker and Lea Worcester, copyright 2015. The reference to Dean Davis is short, so I will, as a courtesy to you, quote page 36.

"Dean E. E. Davis arrived on campus in summer 1925 with a no-nonsense attitude toward renewing a sadly deteriorating physical plant, ridding the student body of students that lacked esprit de corps, and purging the faculty of incompetents. He began a 20-year building program and, with difficulty, built a new library (now College Hall) and a science hall (now Preston Hall) during the 1920s. His stern requirement of high scholarship standards and behavior resulted in 102 of 456 students leaving or being expelled due to bad grades or infractions during the school year. He replaced more than half of the 40 faculty members with younger, energetic, and relatively inexperienced teachers. Before he retired in 1945, Davis led the college through the Great Depression, World War II, and positioned the school for yet another major step, to become a four-year college. Davis Street is named in his honor, and Davis himself planted the grove of pine trees at Davis Street and Park Row Drive." BeautifulDayToday (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"When E.E. Davis became dean of North Texas Agricultural College in 1925, he began a 20-year building program. His aggressive recruitment of faculty and students helped NTAC become the largest junior college in the Southwest." BeautifulDayToday (talk) 15:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, yes, the simple statement of "Davis worked continually to improve the quality of students, faculty, and facilities" is accurate and reflects the historical record in highly summarized fashion. I stand by it, and hope the references and even direct quotes from published sources is helpful. Again, go to the book "Transitions" for a more lengthy treatment of Dean Davis and NTAC under his leadership. Thank you. BeautifulDayToday (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at University of Texas at Arlington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]