User talk:Bearberserk

Bearberserk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bearberserk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Taekkyon

Hello Bearberserk,

                                I saw what you wrote on Taekkyon & Subak. It is good work.

                                I understand what you are trying to say in regards to "Taekkyon & Taekkyon Yaetbop", but Taekkyon is generic term. I think that it would be better to write "competition Taekkyon & Taekkyon Yaetbop".

Competition taekkyon (as in taekkyon competitions between villages, & modern day competitions), & Taekkyon Yaetbop (street fighting).

                               I also think that writing that Taekkyon kicks are soft or not meant to hurt is not good.

                             The reason for the above, is that Taekkyon has a bad image of having kicks which are not meant to hurt the oppinent. For years Korean government web sites and others have portrayed this soft image of Taekkyon which has damaged its image in the West.

                             regards

                             Seoul Bob. Seoul Bob (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft contact sparring is ok. Even when I was boxing, we always did soft contact sparring. It's safe & fun. However, in real life, full contact is used. There should be a distinction between soft contact sparring & real life's full contact usage. Also, it's better if there's also full contact sparring. Taekyun should also have Yetbub competitions, maybe with sparring equipment for safety. (Punching & kicking for real, unlike regular Taekkyeon competitions & sparrings which is a soft contact kicking with wrestling. Yetbub does hard power punching & kicking for real unlike regular Taekkyeon sparrings.) -bearberserk

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Bearberserk, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Breaking (martial arts) have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'm going to put quotation marks around the content then. I don't know how to do indentation thing though. -bearberserk

January 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Goguryeo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Zanhe (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will just make a copy of what I wrote in the talk section then. -bearberserk

February 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Bearberserk. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Breaking sticks (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what you are talking about. On my user channel, I can't even look up another editor's name. Bearberserk (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imgur links in citations

Hey there. Please be aware that images on Imgur won't last, they delete images after a few months. It's best to fill out the entire citation template, giving author, article name, date, and the URL to the online publication instead of a screenshot.

I also have to request that you tone down the "Korea vs. Japan" tone in some of your edits, it's not necessary to have entire subsections dedicated to that. Instead it is much better to just give a neutral-sounding history of the subject under the section "History" and let the facts speak for themselves. The section in Breaking (martial arts) is not written in a concise matter-of-fact manner. It would also be good to add some links (you can add links to other articles by writing [[things in brackets like this]]).

Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to upload pictures to Wikipedia, but I don't have the time and space to be doing that. So, I'm using Imgur pictures for now. They seem to stay for a years. (Those were uploaded few months to years ago.)

I have hostility against Japan, but I don't let my emotional inclination (bias) affect my logical bias. There shouldn't be logical bias.

Yeah, wordings have to be changed.

Bearberserk (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Wikibreaking (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's stupid. I don't use multiple accounts. I just sometimes don't log in before editing. Bearberserk (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's stupid. I don't use multiple accounts. I just sometimes don't log in before editing. Also, I don't use multiple accounts for illegitimate reason. Bearberserk (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to explain the overlap in editing in order to be considered for unblocking. Yamla (talk) 17:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Overlap in editing is because sometimes, I don't log in to my ID but just use my IP address to edit Wiki due to laziness. I didn't do anything illegitimate neither with my ID nor with my IP address. I didn't act like being 2 different people neither. Bearberserk (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Yamla's comment, below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are talking about anonymous editing with an IP address, but haven't addressed the overlap between this account and Wikibreaking. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know anything about my account overlapping with Wikibreaking. Could you give a specific example and a link when I did Wikibreaking? I have merely uploaded contents (& references) and edited wording. I don't remember doing anything that can be construed as Wikibreaking.

EDIT: I don't know if the ID Wikibreaking was me. Might have been me. I don't remember. (But his talk page sounds like something I would have or could have said. They are certainly the topics I've talked about on Wiki before, and I had talked to admins back then.) But what did Wikibreaking do that it should be blocked and even a different ID (this ID) should be blocked. Also, I checked Wikibreaking's talk page, and it is from January 2016. Whatever it did, I'm not doing it anymore. Whatever rules the ID Wikibreaking violated, I'm now following the rules. And I don't know the password to Wikibreaking, which is why I'm using Bearberserk. Could you unblock this ID please. I'm not using this ID for illegitimate reasons. I submitted another unblock request cause I didn't get a respond with the other one.

Edit2: I found the password to the ID Wikibreaking. Apparently, it's blocked for making legal threats. If legal consequences are going to be done, they are going to be done anyway eventually. (But they haven't been done yet.) However, as for now, there will be no legal threat nor consequences. Also, whatever rules I violated before, I am following the rules as for now.

Bearberserk (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Disabling a duplicate request. See below for the substantive answer. EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know if the ID Wikibreaking was me. Might have been me. I don't remember. (But his talk page sounds like something I would have or could have said. They are certainly the topics I've talked about on Wiki before, and I had talked to admins back then.) But what did Wikibreaking do that it should be blocked and even a different ID (this ID) should be blocked. Also, I checked Wikibreaking's talk page, and it is from January 2016. Whatever it did, I'm not doing it anymore. Whatever rules the ID Wikibreaking violated, I'm now following the rules. And I don't know the password to Wikibreaking, which is why I'm using Bearberserk. Could you unblock this ID please. I'm not using this ID for illegitimate reasons. I submitted another unblock request cause I didn't get a respond with the other one. Bearberserk (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you now have the password to the Wikibreaking account, you should log in and make a proper unblock request on Wikibreaking's talk page. When you do so, you need to withdraw the legal threat you made previously. EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One unblock request at a time. By posting multiple unblock requests or continually editing your unblock request, you make it less likely any other admin will respond in a timely manner. --Yamla (talk) 15:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found the password to the ID Wikibreaking. Apparently, it's blocked for making legal threats. If legal consequences are going to be done, they are going to be done anyway eventually. (But they haven't been done yet.) However, as for now, there will be no legal threat nor consequences. Also, whatever rules I violated before, I am following the rules as for now. Bearberserk (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As you aren't eligible for unblock consideration here, I have revoked your talk page access here. Another admin will be along shortly to review your request. Note that you are very specifically not following the rules. Every single edit you made with this account was in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email access revoked. Use WP:UTRS on your main account. --Yamla (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24912 was submitted on Apr 25, 2019 16:37:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Following a discussion in the #wikipedia-en-unblock IRC channel I have re-established talk page access so Bearberserk can make their case here. They indicated that they prefer this username to "Wikibreaking", and if the block is lifted, there's no reason to force them to not use their preferred username. Huon (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bearberserk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I withdrew legal threat, and I was told to request for unblock 6 months after. It's been more than 6 months.

I was told to follow WP:OFFER and to appeal for unblock again in six months. It has been 6 months, so I am following up on my ban. Could you unblock my account please? I have 2 accounts. My first account was Wikibreaking which was blocked first. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikibreaking Then, a couple years later, I created my second account Bearberserk which was blocked because my first account wasn't unblocked before I created my second account. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bearberserk I am told that I should use only 1 account. If so, I would like to use my second account Bearberserk because I like that name better. Could you unblock my second account Bearberserk? As for my first account, you can remove it or whatever. Or you can unblock my first account Wikibreaking first then I will submit another appeal for my second account Bearberserk which I plan on using because I like that name better.

I wasn't planning on editing any article right away, but since I am told that I should plan to edit something if I want my account unblocked, I will edit the following 2 articles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_sword

https://i.imgur.com/E1zwCtQ.jpg

Hwando is the Korean version of Japanese Katana; this sword was the most common sword in Korea. This sword was not imported from Japan but from Guguryeo Dynasty's Hwandudaedo. According to 1451's Chosun Royal Journal's February 25th entry, there were 2 different types of Hwando: one with longer handle (2 Bbyeom/뼘) and one with shorter (1 Bbyeom/뼘 and 3 finger widths) handle. The one with shorter handle was used on horse while the one with longer handle was used off horse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaking_(martial_arts)

http://www.kwunion.com/interesting/mas-oyama-america-part-3/

In 1940 the “Japanese American Courier” reported that “Marking its 34th anniversary the Tacoma (judo) dojo will hold its annual tournament Sunday afternoon at the Buddhist Church auditorium . . . Over 40 black belts are listed for action. An additional feature on the programme will be Masato Tamura’s ‘rock breaking’ demonstration via the ancient Japanese art of “kiai jutsu”. He will also oppose a quintet of picked black belts”. Tamura was a well known judoka who had got his third dan during Jigoro Kano’s visit to America in 1938. In none of these accounts, incidentally, is there any mention of karate.

Bearberserk (talk) 23:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This will be handled on your UTRS request under your Wikibreaking account. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noting that CheckUser does not detect any block evasion. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I am still blocked. Why is this taking so long? Bearberserk (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]