User talk:Beanislife

Welcome!

Hi Beanislife! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! JarrahTree 13:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rest Less (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seawolf35 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rest Less and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 01:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the article. I've gone ahead and made further changes to provide a more neutral tone. Would you be able to take a look and see what you think before I submit for review again?

Thanks again Beanislife (talk) 11:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Providing the diff here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Rest_Less&diff=prev&oldid=1182625295 Beanislife (talk) 12:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I don’t usually re-review drafts upon request. When you think it is ready and it is written in a neutral point of view and free of peacock terms, resubmit it and a reviewer will get to it in due time. Best, Seawolf35 (talk - email) 16:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. I've gone ahead and resubmitted the updated article.

Thanks, Beanislife (talk) 20:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Beanislife! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seawolf35 (talk - email) 01:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rest Less (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Tagged unreferenced section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rest Less and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've gone ahead and done that now. Before I resubmit, is this what you were looking for? Beanislife (talk) 16:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rest Less (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KeepItGoingForward were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rest Less and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rest Less

Hello, Beanislife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rest Less, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rest Less

Hello, Beanislife. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rest Less".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]