User talk:Be Jain

Welcome!

Hi Be Jain! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Hathigumpha inscription

Hello, Be Jain. Barua's translation of the Hathigumpha inscription is well-understood, but it has had its own share of criticism and most importantly, the apex body has not published them. It does not amount to a reliable source as per Wikipedia's standards. See WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:OLDSOURCES. As per Wikipedia's policy on sources, the translation as published by the apex archaeological survey body of the country (The Archaeological Survey of India) is accepted in case of a contention. It is also usually the internationally accepted standard. See:

The Archaeological Survey of India: https://archive.org/details/epigrahiaindicav014769mbp/page/n97/mode/2up?view=theater
University of British Columbia: https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/full-text/24/1.0340476/0.txt
University of London: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/29097/1/10731192.pdf
University of California Press: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/c125c9b3-4eb5-439f-8857-5df80c7424fe/bridging-two-worlds.pdf

In case there are contentious sources, alternative translations by scholars may be posted, but deleting content endorsed by reliable sources amounts to vandalism. See WP:VANDAL. I encourage healthy discussion on what might be most suitable for Wikipedia without resorting to edit warring. RJShashwat (talk) 01:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bijolia Parshvanath temple, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ParvatPrakash (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhank Caves. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ParvatPrakash (talk) 23:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

excessive amount of warnings for a content disagreement ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hathigumpha inscription, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ParvatPrakash (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kankali Tila. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ParvatPrakash (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Maksi, you may be blocked from editing. ParvatPrakash(talk) 17:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Maksi. ParvatPrakash (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a Biased information to a Public page is presenting Biased views of your own to Wikipedia. This is the Second warning I am giving for your biased opinion next time.

You will be blocked from further editing Wikipedia if you continue to express your Biased opinion on Wikipedia pages, as you did to Maksi. Be Jain (talk) 05:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you reverted at Maksi was only of a copy-edit and no other additions or removals. Edit warring is really not required there. If you think it does not reflect your POV, please discuss it here or on the article talk page before resorting to edit warring. Remember that edit warring with non-neutral and unreferenced material amounts to vandalism and can lead to a ban. ParvatPrakash (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Such a Information that the main temple only belongs to the Shvetambara Sect of Jainism is a biased opinion. When both the sects have right to worship the idol. Princy Council had given the Result in favour of both the sects. Remember that doing biased edits and Vandalism may lead to permanent ban. Just add Information not the Biased Information as you did in Maksi. Be Jain (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I have not edited Maksi and I have nothing to do with sects of Jainism. What you are accusing me of was already present on the page. You are just reverting it to a version that has the same thing written in poor English. I hope you understand. ParvatPrakash (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rishabhanatha. ParvatPrakash (talk) 19:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a Low quality image is just irresponsible. Person coming on a page wants a High-quality image to precised.

For your biased edits

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you again tried to vandalise Wikipedia pages, as you did at Rishabhnatha Be Jain (talk) 04:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The existing picture of of very high quality and of a publically popular icon of Rishabhanatha. The picture added by you was of a lower quality with improper lighting. Therefore, your edit was unconstructive and hence, reverted. You are free to discuss it here before resorting to edit warring. ParvatPrakash (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rishabhanatha. ParvatPrakash (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rishabhanatha. Be Jain (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest Notice

Hello, Be Jain. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Rishabhanatha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Maksi

ParvatPrakash (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Rishabhanatha) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok No problem for that, if you think I am the culprit of vandalism no problem. Always working for the Growth of Wikipedia. Be Jain (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism. You have both edit warred because you both want to improve the encyclopedia, and you'll now need to discuss on the article's talk page. Without personally addressing each other, focused on the article content. See the bottom of Special:Permalink/1233649252 for advice I just wrote for ParvatPrakash. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discuss

Edit warring does not help Wikipedia. Let's discuss the difference in POV and strive for consensus. You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Rishabhanatha § Image of the subject. ParvatPrakash (talk) 06:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ParvatPrakash (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]