User talk:Bcornwell32

Welcome!

Hello, Bcornwell32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 12:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bcornwell32, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bcornwell32! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Farkas (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Farkas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Farkas (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Farkas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out let's discuss it 04:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Thanks for your contribition at Draft:David Farkas. I note that you have a conflict of interest and encourage you to read our guideline WP:COI. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Farkas has been accepted

David Farkas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Please note that I approved this article despite some issues, then fixed those issues. Please read WP:COI and comply with this guideline. Thanks

Flat Out let's discuss it 05:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have a hard copy newspaper article, but I can't find it online in the archives to provide a url in my citation. Is there anything I can do to better source it, like scan the article. Or should I just cite the article without a link. Thanks.

Bcornwell32 (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bcornwell32, as long as it is properly cited, it does not have to be online. Primefac (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A scan would be problematic on grounds of copyright (unless it's a very old newspaper article, say pre-1923 or so). Simply provide enough information to allow others to look up the article in a library archive. Huon (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]