User talk:Bashadetroit

Hello Bashadetroit, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Bonnie Sue Stein

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bonnie Sue Stein, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gohproductions.org/bonniebio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshiko Chuma

Hi. This article was tagged and listed by another editor at the copyright problem board as following too closely on the artist's website. It did incorporate language directly from that source, and as we had no verification of permission to use the material, the existing article had to be deleted. However, I was impressed by Ms. Chuma's accomplishments as listed in your article and so have created a new article for her using such material as I could locate in a "google news" search. I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate you making an article about her. While we have to be careful for legal reasons not to copy phrases or sentences from other sources without verification of permission, I found her a fascinating woman and tremendously enjoyed learning more about her. Since I do not have a background in dance, I'm sure there's considerably more room for improvement. I hope you'll feel free to add information about her that is verified by reliable sources. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your note. In order to restore the older versions of the article, we would need you to provide verification of license for the content at [1]. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.

However, I do need to let you know that it is unlikely that the community would decide to replace the current version (which is sourced to multiple references) with the prior content, which was brief and only referenced to her website. Wikipedia as a "tertiary source" prefers to draw content from secondary sources such as newspaper articles or magazine profiles or book references wherever possible. Certainly, though, we should be able to incorporate some content from the earlier into the current if permission is provided.

Please let me know at my talk page if you decide to follow through with the verification process, and I'll try to help make sure that it proceeds smoothly. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello Bashadetroit. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Yoshiko Chuma, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GOH Productions. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute ensemble

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Absolute ensemble, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.absoluteensemble.com/content/Absolute%20Ensemble%20engl.doc.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Absolute Zawinul

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Absolute Zawinul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=35417. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dolescum (talk) 17:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While you may well be the original author of the words, this site asserts copyright over them. They either need to change the site to show that the material is licensed in a way that Wikipedia can use it, or if they are improperly asserting copyright, someone (not us) needs to address the issue.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Absolute ensemble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Absolute ensemble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dolescum (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Bashadetroit/Vit Horejs

Hello, Bashadetroit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vit Horejs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 20:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vit Horejs (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Without references, a biography cannot be accepted into the encyclopedia. Article needs to demonstrate that he passes WP:NOTABILITY guidelines, WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. THe external links might be better utilised with a description as shown at WP:EXT#How to link. Any that could be used to verify the article content should be converted to references and placed inline at the point in the text to which they refer. See WP:REFB for a guide to how to do this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vit Horejs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vit Horejs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bashadetroit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vit Horejs

Hello, Bashadetroit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vit Horejs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Dom from Paris (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]