Since you had involvement in the blocking of user Y26Z3 because of his edits at Lusitanic, I thought you'd be interested to know that I believe he has created a new sockpuppet through which he is beginning to make similar edits and is again lobbying for the deletion of Lusitanic. The sockpuppet investigation I started against him is here:
I don't see you providing evidence regarding this IP's posting anything pointing to a virus, I've blocked the IP for 3 hours so you can provide some solid evidence. TonywaltonTalk00:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I linked to the page posted, and a window popped up telling me I have a virus, trying to induce me to continue on and probably to try to get me to buy some fake anti-virus software. I couldn't close the window, so I had to abort it via Task Manager. I then ran Malwarebytes, and it said I do NOT have a virus. So that site is not to be trusted, and that's why I also excised that section of the ref desk page. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 00:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commiserations on your unsuccesful attempt to have me sent to the Phantom Zone, the thread has now been closed with no action, to the apparent pleasure of someone else you've presumably pissed off in the past with this sort of thing (see my talk page). <insert whatever you think Malleus would say here if he had been the editor you'd just stolen a whole day from in your misguided belief that I had done something wrong> Cracker92 (talk) 21:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC) -- Reposted by 174.231.129.76 (talk·contribs) / 174.232.66.149 (talk·contribs) / 174.232.67.235 (talk·contribs) at 21:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC) and also at 21:54, 21:55, 21:59, 22:02 and 22:14[reply]
I think we may have to accept that someone just wants to play criminal defendant. If multiple editors point out the relevant policy and they continue to ask for the relevant policy, they're not worth dealing with unless they do something disruptive. I could be wrong though, appreciate your effort, but I'm turning into a pumpkin and have to go. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Probably best to just notify AlexandrDmitri directly instead of posting in that section. Also: I've offered to unblock the guy if he'll refrain from commenting on other editors. If he agrees, would you be willing to return the favor and let the CUs and SPI clerks take it from there? 28bytes (talk) 04:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You called me a nanny here: Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#Doctor.27s_office_credit_card_billing. You were right. I was being a nanny. It looked liked the thread was going to lose focus, as the so frequently do, so I went to nip it in the bud. And it worked. If you think it was you personally I was going after, it wasn't. I'll be doing it whenever I catch it early enough if I think I can try and keep the question on target, no matter who and no matter what political stripe. (Edited: Which isn't that frequently, actually.) I actually like reading most of your posts, so there's that. Mingmingla (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No hard feelings intended or received. :) When I saw it twice in one thread, I started to picture that Army officer that Graham Chapman used to portray in Python, where he would step into an overly-silly skit and say, "Stop it!" ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 17:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited
Hello, Bugs, just wanted to invite you to participate in a userspace extension of a recent RefDesk discussion you took part in, created for the purposes of illumination, community goodwill, and, just perhaps, improved articles on the subject matter. This invitation goes out specifically to you as a participant in the original discussion, but anyone reading this is free to join us. Come contribute if you are so-inclined and don't have too much real editing to do! :) Snow (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the AN/I notification. Mentioning me at AN/I, is no big deal, but I would appreciate a timely heads-up. On a related note, I asked Elen for a CU based on the Anagram and your accusation. Hopefully, since she just blocked DBW, she will oblige; if not, I will be more than happy to help you file an SPI. All I'm asking for in both the notification and sock issues, is that you follow the established guidelines. It takes a little more effort, but in the end, the resulting professionalism is best for all of us. Thanks in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Bred Ivy (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I mean that to me, eventually they would see that all of the runnning around and complaining at AN/I, AIV, SPI, etc...sooner or later they would get tired of your antics, no? Anyways good luck with your useless edits, maybe they keep you around just out of curiosity of what your willing to do next. 80.244.241.11 (talk) 15:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, BB. I was just over at Marilyn Monroe, and just wanted to say your comments on the talk page are particularly well-reasoned and thoughtful, and I can see that in some places where your clam replies might have helped avert heated arguments. Kudos, my colleague! With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You commented on Fasttimes68 once before in a ban proposal.
Welcome to the TPM network of sites (“the TPM websites”). By accessing and using the TPM websites and their services (the “Service”) you are agreeing to be legally bound by these Terms of Use.
1. GENERAL
TPM Media LLC (“TPM”) may change these Terms of Use from time to time so be sure to check back periodically. Your use of the TPM websites after any changes have been posted will constitute your agreement to the modified Terms of Use. You understand and agree that TPM may discontinue or change the TPM websites and/or the Service at any time, without notice. You also understand and agree that TPM may discontinue or restrict your use of the TPM websites for any reason without notice and without any liability to you. In addition, when using the TPM websites, you shall be subject to any posted guidelines or rules applicable to the Service, which may be posted from time to time and which are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.
2. COPYRIGHT
The content displayed on the TPM websites, including the selection, arrangement, and design (“Content”) is the property of TPM or its licensors, and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. The Content may be used only for your personal and non-commercial use and may not be edited or modified for any purpose. By accessing the TPM websites, you agree not to reproduce, retransmit, distribute, disseminate, display, sell, publish, broadcast or circulate the Content to anyone, except that you may occasionally reproduce, distribute, display or transmit an insubstantial portion of Content, for a noncommercial purpose, to a limited number of individuals, provided you use the phrase “Used with permission from the TPM websites, a service of TPM Media LLC.” All rights not expressly granted herein are hereby reserved.
TPM does not claim ownership of the Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the TPM websites. The Content is the property of the author of such Content. You agree to grant TPM a perpetual, royalty-free and irrevocable right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, create derivative works from, transfer, and sell such Content in any format now know or hereafter created, and to use your name and other identifying information you provide in connection with that Content. You also permit any visitor or member of the TPM websites to use such Content for personal use as described above.
If you believe in good faith that any Content infringes your copyright, you may send us a notice requesting that the material be removed though we cannot guarantee that any action will be taken as a result of your correspondence. Notices should be sent here.here.here..
3. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIABILITY
You agree that your access to, and use of, the Service and the Content available on the TPM websites is on an “as-is”, “as available” basis. The TPM websites include facts, views, opinions and recommendations of individuals and organizations deemed of interest, and TPM does not endorse these views, opinions and recommendations. TPM specifically disclaims any representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the TPM websites and the Content, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties of accuracy, completeness, timeliness, noninfringement, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. TPM will not be liable to you or anyone else for any loss or injury caused in whole or part by its negligence or contingencies beyond its control in procuring, compiling, interpreting, reporting or delivering> the TPM websites and the Content. In no event will TPM be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken by you in reliance on the Content. TPM shall not be liable to you or anyone else for any damages (including, without limitation, consequential, special, incidental, indirect, or similar damages), other than direct damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Because some states or jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for damages or the exclusion of certain types of warranties, parts or all of the above limitation may not apply to you.
4. LINKS TO THIRD PARTY SITES
The TPM websites may contain hyperlinks to web sites operated by persons other than TPM. You agree not to hold TPM responsible for the content or operation of such web sites. A hyperlink from the TPM websites to another web site does not imply or mean that TPM endorses the content on that web site or the operator or operations of that site. You are solely responsible for determining the extent to which you may use any content at any other web sites to which you might link from the TPM websites.
5. ADDITIONAL LEGAL TERMS
These Terms of Use, your rights and obligations, and all actions contemplated by these Terms of Use will be governed by the laws of the United States of America and the State of New York, as if these Terms of Use were a contract wholly entered into and wholly performed within the State of New York. These Terms of Use will not be governed by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. If any provision in these Terms of Use is invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect, and the invalid or unenforceable provision will be deemed superseded by a valid, enforceable provision that most closely matches the intent of the original provision. These Terms of Use are the entire and final agreement regarding the TPM websites and their Content, and supersede any prior or contemporaneous communications between TPM and you regarding the TPM websites and their Content.
6. USER OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of your use of the Service, you represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract and are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdiction. You agree to provide true, accurate, current and complete information about yourself upon registration and thereafter. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your password and account, and are fully responsible for all activities that occur under your password or account. You agree to immediately notify the TPM websites of any unauthorized use of your password or account or any other breach of security. TPM cannot and will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your failure to comply this Section 6. You agree to comply with all local rules regarding online conduct and acceptable Content, including all applicable laws regarding the transmission of technical data exported from the United States or the country in which you reside.
You agree not to use the TPM websites or the Service to:
•Upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available (“Post”) any Content: •that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, false or inaccurate, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
•that you do not have a right to make available under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships (such as inside information, proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements); or
•that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights (“Rights”) of any party;
•harm minors in any way;
•Impersonate any person or entity, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity;
•Post any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, “junk mail,” “spam,” “chain letters,” “pyramid schemes,” or any other form of solicitation;
•Post any material that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment;
•Interfere with or disrupt the Service or servers or networks connected to the Service, or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Service;
•Violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, intentionally or unintentionally;
•“stalk” or otherwise harass another; and/or
•Collect or store personal data about other users.
You agree to be fully responsible for your own Content. The TPM websites act as a venue for you to Post your Content. While TPM has the right to refuse to post or remove, edit or abridge any Content for any reason, it is otherwise not involved in the writing or decisions as to the Content of its users. As a result, TPM has no control over the quality, accuracy or legality of the Content on the TPM websites. All Content posted on the TPM websites is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. Because the TPM websites are venues, in the event that you have a dispute with a user of the TPM websites and their Service, you release TPM and its officers, members and employees from claims, demands and damages (actual and consequential) of every kind and nature, known and unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising out of or in any way connected with such disputes. You agree to indemnify and hold TPM and its officers, members and employees harmless from any claims, damages, losses or costs (including reasonable attorney’s fees) that arise out of any of your Content, including, without limitation, any Content posted or otherwise provided by you that infringes any copyright, trademark, intellectual property right of any person or defames any person or violates any person’s rights of publicity or privacy, or otherwise violates these Terms of Use.
7. PRIVACY AND USE OF INFORMATION.
Please visit our Privacy Policy, which also governs your use of the TPM websites, to understand how we collect and use information about you. If you are outside the United States, you understand and agree that by providing the TPM websites any information about yourself, you are consenting to the transfer of that information to the United States.
8. TRADEMARK INFORMATION
The TPM logo, TPMCafe, Talking Points Memo, TPM, TPM Media, TPM Election Central, TPMmuckraker, TPMtv and the other trademarks, service marks, logos and trade names displayed on the TPM websites (the “TPM Marks”) are the trademarks of TPM. You agree not to display or use the TPM Marks in any manner without TPM’s prior written consent
Pointing out that you have expressed a Bad IdeaTM is not generally considered cyber-bullying. Why not just take all that good advice to move it into your userspace where you can work on it in peace? Franamax (talk) 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Helvitica
I am putting myself at risk of being accused of gross indecisiveness, but, on an issue where I was very borderline anyway, your comments have been just enough to push me back over the border: [1]. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Electric Catfish
The fellow has put up a retired banner over this affair. Very sorry to see that happen. I wonder if you hadn't immediately taken the report to ANI if the fellow would not have a retired banner up right now. Wikichecker shows he never edits after 0200 UTC so there was no emergent need for admin action. I expect some of my remarks may have been too harsh as well, and have apologised to Elec. Catfish. I shouldn't participate on notice boards late at night; I could have handled this better. And Bugs, you did not post anything at all on the other fellow's page before you took him to ANI. That seems like a bad thing to me and he is righteously pissed off. I have posted an apology on his page as well for my part in the affair. -- Dianna (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Baseball Bugs, Electriccatfish2 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I thought your mention of TSN's top 66 base stealers of all-time was revelatory. I am in the camp favoring 400 SBs as the starting point for inclusion on the list, which is being discussed at stolen bases talk page. Zepppep (talk) 09:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was using Wikipedia to fact check around Adlai Stevensons I and II, and ran into your pic of the gravesite in Bloomington, it would appear right about the time I was taking walks and sitting thereabouts to read on Sundays - Nov 2005. I went to explore your images further and found you in the Pacific NW, again in spaces at times I would have wandered through. So I thought to stop by and make your acquaintance, of a sorts.
mbox
| type = speedy
| image = none
| style = font-size:95%;
| text =
This joke may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion because it is not funny.
If this joke does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice. If you created this joke and you disagree with its proposed speedy deletion, please add:
{{hangon}}
directly below this tag, and then explain why you believe this joke should not be deleted below. See help understanding jokes.
Hey Bugs, I saw you hit the big 10,000 at ANI, so I thought it only fair to drop you a note. Keep on, keepin on buddy. :-D (link) — Ched : ? 02:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You've won an Oscar!
King of AN/I award
With 10,000 edits, you are now officially the King of AN/I! Sure, AN/I may be a bit of a trash bin, but every trash bin needs its own Oscar! 28bytes (talk) 03:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Baseball Bugs,
Read the article, looked up the YouTube vids: the man was obviously a pioneering Flying Spaghetti Marxist. I'm surprised his bibliography doesn't include writing the Om-Nom-Nommunist Manipesto.
It would seem to me that the English-speaking world outside the US tends to believe the "USA-ns doesn't understand irony" stereotype. Erm, see: Bill Hicks, Phyllis Diller, Will Ferrell, and so many more.
I've quoted Zonker from Doonesbury on my userpage.
Very early on in that University career I bought Republican Party Reptile the same year it came out. Read it and fell about the place laughing. My very earnest left wing friends were of course horrified. There I was trying to be a campus radical along with the rest of them (hard to do on your own. Socialism, like misery, loves company) and I was reading books that made baby Trotsky cry.
--Shirt58 (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)--Shirt58 (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow
In this issue:
Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Don't look at the diff for the first edit: look at the page display and try to find any of the headers below the GeoSwan thread. Nyttend (talk) 03:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about what is ANI? MDSanker11:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
I have brought up your username specifically at ANI. Feel free to comment there. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talk page
Can I make a recommendation? Could you put all of the above in a sub page and transclude it on this page so it's easier to find where to post comments? I can show you what I mean if you're interested.--v/r - TP14:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll work on it. However, I don't really feel like expending too much energy for a guy who's been here several years and doesn't know what WP:ANI is and doesn't know to click the "new section" and has been under attack for copyright violations. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 21:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now that you've removed the <!-- New discussions below this line please! --> on your talk page, new editors may not know where to post on this page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe there might be a few too many colons, if you were to remove just a few it might improve the page just a little but then I'm not an expert. I can't believe you thought those were colonels' eagles - wasamateryu heh. Isn't ANI a girl's name? Well I'm off for some Karotte Saft. SlightSmile02:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeh, I guess this page could use a colonectomy. I decided I needed a Clean Start, or a Clean Slate anyway. I would exercise my Right to Vanish, if only my name was Harvey. Late at night last night, I mis-read the page those collar insignia were on. I thought something was wrong, but I went with it. I guess I was at sea. ANI a girl's name? As in the famous musical, "ANI Get Your Gun"? Mmm... could be. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 03:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this came across the way you intended
Hello BaseballBugs. I really am sorry to revert an edit of yours, as I said in the edit summary, since I've observed your work and respect it. One huge pet peeve of mine that is becoming particularly prevalent in articles on baseball players is the tendency to begin every sentence with "On [say] June 9, 2012...", while the next sentence begins "On June 23, 2012...", etc. It is an understandable outgrowth of articles that are written 'in real time', but I try to fight it when possible, as it makes for wretched prose, and it frankly drives me crazy. It is especially unnecessary in a place like the Thome article, in a section that describes a single season (half a season, actually) and thus need not attach the year to every single date. Hopefully you see what I mean. All the best to you, CCS81 (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Baseball Bugs. You have new messages at CCS81's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Baseball Bugs. You have new messages at CCS81's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Slurs
In September 2012, I wondered what's wrong with some people. Do they sometimes remember that they're racists and forget to keep it in? Drmies (talk) 02:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I had 2 email addresses from a while back, and sent you a note to both. One came back as undeliverable, but hopefully you got or will get the other. — ChedZILLA20:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about what is ANI? MDSanker11:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
I have brought up your username specifically at ANI. Feel free to comment there. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talk page
Can I make a recommendation? Could you put all of the above in a sub page and transclude it on this page so it's easier to find where to post comments? I can show you what I mean if you're interested.--v/r - TP14:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll work on it. However, I don't really feel like expending too much energy for a guy who's been here several years and doesn't know what WP:ANI is and doesn't know to click the "new section" and has been under attack for copyright violations. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 21:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What's up with you these days?
Up to now I've had respect for your opinions. But recently it appears that you speak, and make personal accusations, without bothering to understand what you're talking about. Considering the usual thought you put behind your writing, the number of transparently false statements you've made in the last few days has really surprised me. You've been no better than Beyond My Ken, whose claims are so idiotic that they wouldn't be worth debunking if others didn't take them up without fact checking. Is this a bad time for you, or can I expect this lack of rigor in the future? Do you just not bother with facts when you disagree with someone? Because in the past, when you said something, say at the ref desk, I took it as equivalent to a RS. Now you're starting to sound like just another Randy. — kwami (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Removed James Randi
I removed the James Randi questions, including your responses. For better or worse User:Bowei Huang, was banned partially for asking these very types of questions and also for sockpuppetry and I don't think we should be allowing them back particularly not since last time we allowed then back is when they started with their James Randi infatuation Nil Einne (talk) 06:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Letting go
BB I understand your point re: Factocop's edit and his history of "alternative accounts" but your points is made. I suggest letting it go. The conversation is descending into the unhelpful--Caililtalk10:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Completely off-topic: Cailil - WTF is up with your talk page? Everything is severely scrunched to the right side - is this something you actually want? It looks... well, terrible. I tried to fix it, but gave up after seeing that it's apparently been that way for awhile. Maybe it's just my browser... It looks normal when I view it on my iPhone, but viewing it on my laptop it's "scrunch city". I've never seen a user page do this before... Doctalk10:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It seems fine to me (I've checked it with Firefox, IE and Camino on Macs, PCs & Linux). For interests sake what browser were you using? I haven't looked at it with Opera or on a tablet so I don't know what's going on there--Caililtalk12:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've got a MacBook Pro with OSX 10.8.1, and am using Safari version 6.0 - and both your talk and user page have the same bizarre scrunching thing when I look at it on this computer. I've also checked a bunch of other user pages to see if the same thing is happening and it's not. When I go to my iPhone everything looks normal, but when on my laptop the same thing happens. It's very strange. Doctalk12:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Bugs, I was just (s)trolling nostalgically through Talk:Yankee Stadium (1923) for the sake of fond old memories, when I noticed an unanswered comment from last January about an apparently incorrect conversion of 20,000 cubic yards of concrete used in building the Stadium to 26,000 cubic meters. I used a conversion template (after a little wikiresearch) to convert those 20,000 cu. yds to 15,000 cubic meters, but of course neither Wyvern (the original enquirer) nor I know how many cubic yards were used (unlike, say, how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall). There's a minute but still finite chance that 26,000 cubic meters of very concrete concrete were indeed used in the Bronx, but incorrectly converted to 20,000 cu yds in the matterless ether of Wikispace (think of Plato's Cave). If you still have the source (50 Years of Drama) cited for this factoid, maybe you could confirm or deny. Thanks (if not to the Yanks). —— Shakescene (talk) 08:59, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you out-of-hand revert this & this from 208.81.184.4 without providing any reason all? The supposed supporting ref on the temple garment article describing about current LDS Church policy using a youth magazine article from 1977 is about as timely as using a reference from that same year to describe how the Commodore PET is the latest, most current state of the art in home computing. Additionally, there is absolutely no relevance between the RfC about the Southern Poverty Law & the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints: see this for another example where this notification spam was removed. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 00:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) An Englishman, a Scotsman, an Irishman and a Rabbi walk into a bar. The Rabbi says, "More than pleased to be here with you, but I appear to be in wrong sub-genre of jokes". Boom tish! I'll be here all week. Please try the fish. --Shirt58 (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say that I agree with your comments at WP:ANI#Legal threats. Unfortunately, when I was looking into nominating the article for AfD, I didn't look properly at the new editor's talk page. It was unfortunate that the IP was a bit BITE-y with the templates. I'm not sure it would have changed me from ultimately nominating the article for deletion, but it would have least prompted me to start a conversation beforehand.
Well, you have a few years on me then; I've never seen one in my lifetime. I didn't have much to do with updating the articles, but I wanted to let you know in case you had an opinion on the ITN status. --Jayron3219:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I heard about [[Mickey Mantle[['s Triple Crown in the late 50s on a radio broadcast. I don't remember Yaz's or Robby's; I must have been busy in RL. Bielle (talk) 03:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Baseball articles being written like hockey articles
Baseball Bugs, I need your help. I have recently gone by the user account name Silvercoindinerman and I have been editing baseball articles that have their histories incorrect. I have fixed these pages, but a hockey administrator that goes by the name of User:Djsasso has reverted all of my edits back and now the articles that I edited now either have their histories incorrect or their page outdated again. For example, I discovered that the Richmond Flying Squirrels were established in 1923 as the Binghamton Triplets so I expanded the team's history with references but it is now reverted back by Djsasso and now it says the team was established in 1972 as the West Haven Yankees which is totally wrong. He didn’t even restore the Binghamton Triplets article either which still redirects to the Flying Squirrels page and he did not erase the Flying Squirrels info from the Eastern League page which still says there are the oldest team in the league which I wrote that. He even redirected pages to the wrong destination. He one time redirected the Erie Cardinals name to the Erie Sailors page. That redirect belongs to the State College Spikes page because the Erie Cardinals were not renamed Sailors. He also did the same thing to the Newark Orioles name to the Hamilton Redbirds page which is not corrected either. It should be redirected to the Hudson Valley Renegades page because the Newark Orioles relocated to Erie to become the Erie Orioles, renamed Sailors later and later relocated to Hudson Valley to become the Renegades. These redirects are now redirected to the correct page but will most likely be redirected the wrong way again. There are also talk pages that he didn't restore either. On baseball team articles, I even added photos for the major league players who played with these teams in the past, but are now reverted back again by Djsasso. He also automatically reverted other info that was not done by me as well. Another user added an awards section to the Lehigh Valley IronPigs article, but now it is not there anymore because Djsasso reverted the last version of the page which the last version was edited by me. Djsasso is treating baseball articles like hockey articles. I am treating baseball articles as good articles and I am showing respect for every teams' history by correcting/expanding the history and to show the great major league players who played through the organization of these clubs in the past. I have been bullied off of Wikipedia for a long time and I can't take it anymore. Djsasso and other hockey administrators think I'm a vandal, but I'm not. He just doesn't like me period. I see a vandal on Wikipedia as a person who writes stupid inappropriate stuff and who tries to be fun for example, a user one time changed the name of the Columbus Blue Jackets page to Columbus Dust Jackets and changing their location from Columbus, Ohio to Dust City, Ohio. I have learned my lesson on wikipedia on how to edit articles, but Djsasso and other hockey administrators don’t think so. I can't stop him for messing up team histories. This is not good for the baseball community. Historyissues (talk) 19:52, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What new devilry is this that has descended on the fine sport of baseball? A plague of "hockey administrators"? Sounds of the worst breed of evil. Perhaps the end is indeed near. --RacerX11Talk to meStalk me20:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your changes to 'some' of the season articles numbering, were too confusing. I'd agree to 'complete' deletion of 'any' numbering on all those MLB season articles, however. GoodDay (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I actually noticed that as well after I undid the edit: the words "Conception-ingénierie" and "fabrication" seem to be pretty good indicators. Should we change it back? Delaywaves • talk13:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll here, to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc(talk|contribs)03:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this fish-whacking for your superfluous usertalk sneer here. Compare Jayron's message above, also related to a usertalk post. Can't you stick to your true métier, lowering the tone at ANI? Bishonen | talk10:37, 16 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]
I realized I was no longer an enfant terrible when people stopped saying "how cynical you are for one so young" and just said "how cynical you are". Around about that same time I forgave my mum and dad for appreciating the gentle humour of A Prairie Home Companion. Jump forward a couple of decades, and I literally LOL-d about how Lake Wobegon's new pastor is, well, she's making a few changes...--Shirt58 (talk) 13:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's funny how someone calls wikipedia editors "retarded". Probably too dumb to understand that he is also a wikipedia editor. Oh, wait... he said f***ing retarded. That excludes the IP, who apparently suffers from ED. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 04:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kansas City and the Birth of the Blues
Hi, Bugs, when I was glancing at the Twins' page to see if they were in Mpls or St. Paul, I noticed no ballpark entry in the Information Box for their pre-prehistory as the Kansas City Blues of the Western League (1894-1901). It would be no great challenge for me to find one, but I think you or another knowledgeable editor could probably get a sounder answer much faster, and then edit the infobox accordingly.
¶ Speaking of which, one of the old-timers interviewed in a Charlie Parker documentary I saw a couple of years ago recounted that when Kansas City was wide-open under the Pendergasts (Harry Truman's patrons) under Prohibition, a typical roadhouse might attract underworld types, to be followed naturally by the ladies of the night, and where the gangsters and whores were to be found, the jazz musicians would be sure to follow! [Just the sort of place to attract a young, impressionable, talented teenager like The Bird.] —— Shakescene (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bugs I hope that you are well and getting prepped to watch the WS tonight. I just wanted to let you know that I wasn't ignoring your message here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Search box. My post there was the last thing I typed before going to sleep last night. I added a post at the VP thread that you started but I don't know if it will bring any resolution to whatever is going on. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk14:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could use some eyes on Australian Christian Lobby, where, like with the article on the American Third Position Party, schills have been trying to portray the movement as they describe themselves. The movement is an over-the-top extreme-right "Christian" organization that is rabidly anti-gay to the point where even other conservative Christian groups in Australia have distanced themselves from it. Would appreciate it if you could add it to your watchlist. Thanks! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 03:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sally Season
Whats a pisser about it was PM/CO was blocked like a week ago for outing, this is pure vendetta from what I can see. I have looked through the history, (links are great) :o) and this is a pure vengence attack. Darkness Shines (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notice that accusing someone of a personal attack without explanation may itself be considered a personal attack. In a very brief interaction, your rhetoric has exploded. You have called one edit an edit war (this is impossible). You have described multiple things as inappropriate without explaining how or why they may be so. You have demanded that I explain myself rather than asking.
I assumed anything sweet but I guess not. If they only go for fruit, that would probably explain why they're called fruit flies but then I'm not really an expert. SlightSmile00:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, OK. Here's how to take care of a fruit fly problem: Take a yellow bowl or deep dish (fruit flies are attracted to the color yellow). Pour water in, then add some vinegar (fruit flies are also called vinegar flies), add a droplet of dishwashing liquid (to reduce the water's surface tension, so that the flies will sink into the water and drown). Then wait a couple of days. If there are still flies around, and the vinegar begins to smell after a couple of days, just repeat the process. You're all welcome. --89.0.205.78 (talk) 12:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Move request pertaining to Ivory Coast sub-articles
It has been proposed that Rugby union in the Ivory Coast be moved to Rugby union in Ivory Coast. This move request will have far-reaching implications for all sub-articles and categories involving the Ivory Coast. The discussion is located here.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Lumberjack Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bevis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Or in the IPA squiggle-ish, /ðɘ ræin in spræin stræiz ˈmræinlɪ ɔn ðɘ plæin/. Bugs, mate, I've said before and I'll say it again: check out the IPA. It explains so much about our language.--Shirt58 (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to let you know — this IP was actually helping; it was reverting the sock of a blocked user on another sock's talk page. Not trying to harass you; I just thought you might be confused if you notice that you got reverted. Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rise of the Guardians
There looks like an incipient edit-war brewing at Rise of the Guardians over a familiar concern: Fans of the movie changing "mixed to positive" to "positive" in the Reception section, even though Metacritic was only a 57, etc. A knowledgeable and experienced WP:FILM editor might want to weigh in. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On why it's a bad idea to carry water for trolls and stalkers
Well, I'm obviously a lot dumber than you are...
Self-reflection is a wonderful thing.
...so you'll need to explain this to us: Under what circumstances would Rosco ever need to interact with BurpFlame, or whatever its name is?
People's names: another difficult area for you.
You're half-right: there are no real circumstances Roscelese needs or -- and here's the key part, so pay attention -- wants to interact with Belchfire, so an interaction ban for Roscelese is not necessary. Belchfire lacks basic self-control, so an interaction ban for Belchfire is necessary.
Here's something for you to try: go to your local county or municipal court and sit in on some hearings for temporary restraining orders against abusive domestic partners/spouses. When the plaintiff and/or plaintiff's attorney makes the request for a TRO, I want you to stand up and explain to the court why it's unfair, UNFAIR, I tell you, if the court doesn't also impose a TRO on the applicant, too. I'm sure the court will be swayed by your iron-clad logic, and if they aren't, you could also break out that old joke about legal definition of "chutzpah", just to entertain them. --Calton | Talk15:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You want me to email you his obituary? I have no idea about how much info I'm allowed to divulge online about a deceased user. It was put to the arbs, and got a mixed response. The Interior(Talk)04:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a freely-available URL, and if it's already well-known that he was user Franamax, you could just provide the link here. If not, then we still have privacy rights of the family to consider. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→
I'm guess I'm worried about connecting his real name with "Franamax", which he didn't do on-wiki, which is why I haven't posted it. The obit doesn't mention his wikipedia work. Ugh. He's laughing right know, watching me hem and hah about this. He would have something witty to say about it I'm sure. The Interior(Talk)04:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're right. It isn't really my business or decision to make. (I'm not in contact with the family) Just wanted to do a nice little bio for him for the WP:RIP page, so others could know more about him. I've been thinking about him a lot over the last few days. He was one of the few Wikipedians I've met in real life, and he was good shit. This really took me by surprise, he never mentioned anything about being sick to me. Anyways, thanks for your advice. Peace, The Interior(Talk)04:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I should've confessed this some time ago, but I like you since the first time I laid eyes on your talk page. Call it love at first sight, if you must. Nobody's talk page's ever made me laugh so hard. XD XD XD Anthonydraco (talk) 05:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see in the relevant ANI section here, I have blocked the IP address for six months. I was inclined to do it for a year, but decided to compromise. I have also placed some much shorter range blocks to make it a little harder for the disruptive editor to carry out his/her threat to evade the block. However, if you see any block evasion, please feel welcome to contact me about it. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The twenty one
So will it blow up as it hits 21 ie England now, then Iceland, Newfoundland, Quebec etc. Or will it wait till it's 21 everywhere and then blow? SlightSmile00:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see unemployed people reporting others who have nothing to do with breaking rules on Wikipedia. I am NOT a sockpuppet or whatever you want to call it. If I am blocked for that, it would be more than unfair. Keeeith (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sorry for being disrespectful toward you, but I can defend myself because I have nothing to do with those users. Tell me where to defend myself please. Keeeith (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tenebrae (talk) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Merry Christmas
Baseball Bugs,
I wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I also wanted to tell you that, though you probably already know this, you have made the most edits to WP:ANI than anyone else, including Misza Bot. (see this) I found this tool and was messing around with it and decided to see who'd made the most edits there. So congratulations. GoPhightins!21:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merry Christmas!
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
YOU WERE LUCKY THIS TIME ROUND AGAINST MY CARNIVAL FRED AND OPPA USA STYLE ACCOUNTS!
YOU CONTINUE SNITCHING ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS AND YOU ARE FINISHED!!! YOU HEAR ME?! FINISHED LIKE USER:CWII!!!
EXPECT MORE ACCOUNTS FROM ME, BABY! I WANT MY FRESH START! YOU WANT MORE PIE?? YOU WANT MORE FROM THE BLAKE SIDE OF ME??
COURTESY OF YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD USER, THE GENIUS! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baseball Bugs (2012) (talk • contribs) 16:01, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you really wanted it, you could usurp it, probably without even having to wait the normal 7 days. Just explain at WP:USURP. But yeah, with your fan club, in the future it's probably not a good idea to telegraph things like this... --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just ugly. Do have a suspicion who the sockmaster might be? Off on a tangent: have you seen any Twenty20 on YouTube? I'm a (sort-of) Cricket purist, but I just love the new shortest form of the ball-game. Shh, don't anyone else I said this!--Shirt58 (talk) 10:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
More stupid than ugly. And since I don't keep track of these characters, I couldn't say who it might be. As regards cricket, I don't follow the sport closely, but it's enjoyable to watch. I have not seen a Twenty20 match yet, so thanks for the tip! ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 18:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have until the time it takes me to write an AE report to remove the bald-faced lie that I engage in anti-Jewish advocacy. I will not tolerate such bullshit. nableezy - 18:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
There is nothing you can say that diminishes the evil obscenity of that so-called "op-ed" which that so-called "news service" stands by. And your support of it paints you very badly. Clean up your own act before you talk to me again. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 23:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am unaware of such an agency. I am aware that news agencies in general publish op-eds that can be called racist. So, could you answer my question? And a repeat of one you've ignored, if a newspaper were to publish an op-ed that called Palestinians wild beasts with the innate urge to kill, would that newspaper's news reports no longer be considered "reliable"? nableezy - 23:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No it did not. To make it simple for you, both of these questions are yes or no questions:
If an op-ed appeared in a newspaper that said
You can put a mask on the Palestinian wild beast, such as a speaker who speaks fluent English. You can put it in a three-piece suit and a silk tie. But once in a while – when the moon is born, when a raven defecates on the head of a howling jackal, or when the pita-bread with za’atar has gone wrong, the beast feels this is its night, and out of a primal instinct it goes ambushing its prey.
would that newspaper cease to be a reliable source?
You've lost me now. You asked if I would withdraw my comments about your apparent support of a racist news agency. The answer is, I will, if you likewise withdraw support for that agency and thus restore some good faith in your behavior. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 23:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe numbers will help.
If an op-ed appeared in a newspaper that said
You can put a mask on the Palestinian wild beast, such as a speaker who speaks fluent English. You can put it in a three-piece suit and a silk tie. But once in a while – when the moon is born, when a raven defecates on the head of a howling jackal, or when the pita-bread with za’atar has gone wrong, the beast feels this is its night, and out of a primal instinct it goes ambushing its prey.
would that newspaper cease to be a reliable source?
Do you intend to redact the comment at RS/N?
Youve answered number 2, or come close. You have yet to answer number 1. Yes or no, if that is at all possible, please. nableezy - 00:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment at 23:29 was an if then statement, not an actual answer to the question I asked. That question was a yes or a no question. You an obviously continue to ignore the question, but if you please, do you think such an op-ed would disqualify a source as being reliable for the time of day, never mind actual news? nableezy - 00:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is, thank you. At least you've crossed one of the derogatory things that I cant say about you off the list. And maybe this will convince you to redact the comment without me acceding to your request, my answer to that question is no. Yedioth Ahronoth is a reliable source as it meets the conditions set in WP:RS. That it published something written by an outside contributor that I find racist does not change that. It was a reliable source before somebody wrote on its opinion pages that Palestinians are wild beasts who yearn to kill and it remains a reliable source after that. nableezy - 00:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(this is being made equally to Nableezy, Baseball Bugs, and Tkuvho)
Recent comments on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, which you participated in, degenerated into mutually combative personal attacks among at least the three of you. Several way nastyness over several days, including noticeboard (ANI, etc) arguments has enused.
This is not acceptable behavior. All of you are editors with long experiences here and in good standing; usually you behave much better.
This message is a formal warning that the Discrectionary Sanctions (formerly ARBPIA sanctions) are in force for this topic area and if the disruption continues, further sanctions, including temporary topic or article bans or blocks per policy may be used to separate the combatants.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
I almost never edit articles on this topic, but this one really went over the line, and I am outraged by it. Tell Nableezy to withdraw support for that racist "news agency" as a so-called "reliable source", and all will be well. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 23:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I share suspicions about the agency's reliability, but I don't believe there's any cause for calling anyone who thinks that it's at least situationally credible totally antisemitic. I believe you are wrong on that and crossed a very important line here in making that explicit claim against Nableezy.
I know where you're coming from, but that's a very big brush you have and very black tar, and Nableezy is not that kind of guy. We've both known him for some years on WP. He does not deserve that. It's not reasonable.
The organization may or may not be antisemitic, in addition to its obvious native bias as a Palestinean based news agency. That said, people supporting it or supporting fair discussion of its value and reliability are not associatively natively biased or potentially antisemitic. That's like calling me a right-wing nut because I read Soldier of Fortune or the Turner Diaries at times (and consider SoF an accurate source for some specific topics, though nothing good comes from the Turner Diaries other than insight into its authors' somewhat disturbed mental state). I also read Trotskyist publications, the New York Times, watch both PBS and Fox News, etc.
Please take a step back and retract or strike through the accusation about Nableezy.
--Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 02:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sally Season. Viriditas (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
..... And glad tidings back to y'all! ..... 
