User talk:Barelvi Shooter

March 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hadith of Najd—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Barelvi movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 23:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively. Maliner (talk) 08:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's disappointing. I hoped you would see the error of your ways and write an acceptable appeal after a few months. But your dishonesty shows that you can't be trusted anymore. I was wrong by assuming good faith earlier. Maliner (talk) 08:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]