User talk:Barcex
Please contact me at es:Usuario Discusión:Barcex
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.
Vaya, como ya os habéis cansado de disponer de la wikipedia en castellano a vuestra santa voluntad sin respetar a nadie con eso de que sois bibliotecarios, ahora pasáis a ésta. Como ya he dicho varias veces, me parece estupendo que se redirija el artículo, pero siempre que se llegue a un consenso a través de una votación. Si tanto interés tienes en borrarlo, pues lo votas y ya, eso cuesta menos que estar borrando y redirigiendo el artículo todo el rato. Gaudio 08:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- There was just your consensus, you didn't care for anyone else's opinions, something you guys are very used to do in Spanish wikipedia. You guys cannot use your caciquism here, just in Spanish wikipedia, the worst wikpedia EVER thanks to people like you. Gaudio 08:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I beg your pardon, I started with good manners. It's always you guys who want to insult or to be rude. I'm not going to retract, what you guys have done was vandalism, I have already explained you the reasons. In stead of respecting people's opinions, now you feel upset, well, you guys make lots of people feel upset with your behaviour, maybe you should retract Gaudio 09:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow, so after more than one year repeating everywhere in the wikipedias that you should have common rules, now you realised we should.Gaudio 09:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
speedy deletion
[edit]Hi Barcex. Thanks for your message and your question about speedy deletion. The rules about what can be speedy deleted and what cannot be are at WP:SPEEDY. In my judgment the page that you proposed did not meet those guideliens. If you disagree with me, you can take the page in question to articles for deletion. Best wishes, Bucketsofg 13:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your note. Yes, I understood that to be your point. It is, however, not the way this is done. If the article in question survives the deletion discussion, there should be a record of that discussion. Deletion would destroy that record. Bucketsofg 15:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Are you kidding me? I don't have to retract, and you guys have called me much worse things in Spanish wikipedia, and no one has apologised, I'm not going to retract, and as you can see, I'm not the only one who considered inappropriate your behaviour. I'm afraid YOU have to retract and not only of this thing about Érika Ortiz Rocasolano, but also of all the things you guys do in Spanish wikipedia as excellent administrators. Gaudio 19:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
No, you retract, and as a administrator of Spanish wikipedia is your responsibility to have allowed all the things you guys (vosotros, vosotras, ustedes) have done me there. Don't play the victim, please, and do retract about that, and about what you are doing here now. Gaudio 20:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you tried to delete this article. I also think it doesn't meet the notability guidelines, so I listed it in the articles for deletion section. Please feel free to give your opinion there. --PeterCantropus (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting
[edit]|
| |
 Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America. You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting? Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America. The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET). | |
Tosão (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
El Encuentro
[edit]Oi! i think there would be no problem, but don't go to disturbing the Wikimedia Argentina?And please,sign your name here.Tosão (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
¿Fotologs, blogs, etc?
[edit]Che, se puede tomar fotos de fotologs?
Yo pensaba que no, peeeeero. Imaginate que panzada
Dicho sea de paso, necesito fotos de interiores de colectivos, sobretodo de otras épocas. De exteriores tengo varias.
Bueno, si ves por ahí alguna, chiflame. Es que muuuuy de a poco estoy extendiendo esto
--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 03:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Stories Project
[edit]Aloha!
My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.
I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.
I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.
I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.
I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!
Thank you,
Victor Grigas
vgrigas@wikimedia.org
Victor Grigas (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
[edit]Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Barcex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Barcex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Barcex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Barcex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)