User talk:Barbarbarty
Barbarbarty, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Barbarbarty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC) |
Capitalization
[edit]Hi Barbarbarty, I notice that you re-capitalized "Independent" at Bernie Sanders after I had left an edit comment, explaining why it should not be capitalized. Perhaps you could explain here why you think that it should be capitalized. Note that there is no "Independent" party, so it is not a proper noun. Note also that "independent" is not capitalized anywhere in Independent politician, except where it begins a sentence. I'll look for your reply, here. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- I was merely following the example I saw on the pages of other politicians that are/were independent. For example, the “Independent” on Jim Jefford’s page is capitalized. I merely thought it would look neater if all party classifications (or lack of one, in this case) were capitalized, and again, the pages of other Independent politicians that had that format. Hopefully, you can understand my rationale. Thanks for reaching out. Barbarbarty (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt and courteous reply, Barbabarty. Clearly, it's a minor matter. However, I'm probably an overzealous stickler for correct usage. So, I'd prefer that the other pages were also an (i), but I'm not so obsessive that I'm going to pursue that quest! Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 17:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Barbarbarty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for February 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avril Haines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ABA Dispute Resolution
[edit]Let's hope this moves us somewhere closer to finding a consensus...
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Oolong (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Applied behavior analysis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:|article's talk page]], and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.03:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. Hello, I'm LinuxNCats. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, I'm LinuxNCats. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.
Nice to meet you
[edit]Do you like Mozart's music? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! Sorry for the late reply! I do like classical music of all stripes but sadly I have not regularly listened to it for a long time. But I do enjoy Mozart! Barbarbarty (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)