User talk:Baltarstar

October 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kongsberg Geospatial have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kongsberg Geospatial was changed by Baltarstar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888838 on 2023-10-27T17:43:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I reported this as a false positive and re-asserted my changes. My edits were certainly not intended to be vandalism, and as of this memo, there has been no refutation by a human. Baltarstar (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hello, I just thought I'd nip this in the bud before there's too many articles to go back and fix. Short descriptions always go at the very top of the page. Always. Check out MOS:ORDER. I fixed a couple of them for you. Also, ALL articles should have a short description. You removed it at Timeline of prehistory. Oddly, you removed the dating too. I have restored them. Be mindful of that in your future edits. Thank you and happy editting. Masterhatch (talk) 18:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! My mistake. I do believe that was the only instance in which I did that. Baltarstar (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you leave the SD at the top per MOS:ORDER. I just fixed it at Timeline of historic inventions. Masterhatch (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:VAR

Please don't change from British to American spelling in an article as you did at Timeline of historic inventions. MOS:VAR is quite clear: "When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change". I reverted the spelling change. Thank you, Masterhatch (talk) 17:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Baltarstar and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe Thank you! I'll be sure to review all these resources soon. Baltarstar (talk) 13:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Baltarstar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles. However, please remember that none is a valid Short description when the article title seems to be enough, but a blank Short description is never valid — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 20:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I was doing that based off W:SD, where it states "All mainspace articles should have a short description (including those that are intentionally blank)." I see now that "blank" actually means entering the word 'none' into the template.

From now on if I'm doing a quick layout correction, I'll put 'none,' and if someone wants to put in something more precise later on they can just edit that. Baltarstar (talk) 12:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do that. If you are making changes to the article, then it is best to add a valid SD rather than just adding none. None means that you agree that a SD is not needed. If you cannot think of a good SD, then it is best to leave the article without any SD. That way it is still flagged up as needing attention — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 12:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for letting me know. Baltarstar (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on stub templates

Thanks for your edits to The Changing World Order tagging it as a {{Stub}}. I did revert your most recent edit, because you incorrectly tagged the article. Please see how to tag stubs correctly—these templates should go at the very end of the article, not the top, and more specific stub templates are preferred when possible (so you shouldn't add the plain {{Stub}} when the article already has {{Nonfiction-book-stub}}). As mentioned earlier on this page, MOS:ORDER is a helpful resource to use. Let me know if this makes sense or if you have any questions, and happy editing! Bsoyka (t • c • g) 23:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me. I went through my contributions history to fix all the other ones, but it seems others such as yourself have beat me to it. From now on I will put stub tags at the bottom with two line spaces and a stub category. Baltarstar (talk) 11:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]