User talk:Baltaborg

October 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i know, sorry. I don't really have a source for them so yeah.. Baltaborg (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PaperTale moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, PaperTale, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the feedback. Could you possibly tell me what specifically about the article that does not meet your criteria? Is it not realiable sources? And what can i do to make it valid? :) Thanks Baltaborg (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It lacks any independent reliable sources and I see no evidence it's actually notable. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okeey.. the first source is very independant it is the official registration. Is it like news articles from newspapers you are wanting? Baltaborg (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am now adding newspapers and independent sources, can you check it? :) Baltaborg (talk) 14:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilal Bhatti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bilal Bhatti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello Baltaborg. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Baltaborg. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Baltaborg|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes sorry, I realized that technically I am kind of being compensated for this, even though i wasn't given any task to do this. I can comply with the paid editing disclosure if necessary. It wasn't my in intention for it to be financial. We are a company that is trying to change the world by literally lifting people out of poverty and making this world a lot better, and I just wanted us to have a Wikipedia page. Didn't realize it was so complex, sorry. I can fix the paid editing thing, and then try to make it absolutely not-biased. I hope that you can maybe help me fix it :)

Thanks Baltaborg (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Baltaborg, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Baltaborg|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, if you consider me too biased, can't somebody else write it? I don't mind, as long as we get a page :) Baltaborg (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how disclosure works, it's a requirement per the terms of use. Disclosing means you just won't be blocked immediately for a TOU violation. It's not optional and it doesn't mean you're guaranteed to have your article accepted. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this ti my profile now. Can i keep improving the article in the sandbox draft now until it is worthy of being published? Baltaborg (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:PaperTale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:PaperTale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now created a new one using the article wizard. I only have independent sources. Please check it and let me know if anything is not ok and i can change it :) Thanks Baltaborg (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/baltaborg (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Baltaborg/sandbox/baltaborg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Baltaborg/sandbox/baltaborg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Baltaborg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

???

"This page is not unambiguously promotional, because i was just quoting their website." Seriously? You think that the text about a company on its own website can't possibly be promotional??? JBW (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i have removed the website as a source, now it is only external independent sources. Baltaborg (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PaperTale (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References fail WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PaperTale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PaperTale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you please tell me what references i need to add? All the sources i cited are independent news-sites. Why is that not valid? How do i make it suitable?

Thanks Baltaborg (talk) 08:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PaperTale (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are either not reliable or contain what the company says about itself so not independent. Please so not resubmit unless better sources can be provided such as mainstream publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PaperTale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Baltaborg/sandbox/baltaborg

Hello, Baltaborg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Baltaborg/sandbox/baltaborg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Baltaborg/sandbox/baltaborg

Hello, Baltaborg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox/baltaborg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PaperTale

Hello, Baltaborg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PaperTale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PaperTale

Hello, Baltaborg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PaperTale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]