User talk:Balacachini

Welcome

Hello, Balacachini, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! !dea4u 11:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

2021 Premier League Asia Trophy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 Premier League Asia Trophy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2021 Premier League Asia Trophy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2021 Premier League Asia Trophy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Premier League Asia Trophy

Hello, Balacachini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Premier League Asia Trophy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miniminter (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submitted with zero improvement. Do that again and this will go to Miscellany for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miniminter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miniminter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 06:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Balacachini! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 06:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Balacachini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Clearly, I have made numerous contributions to Wikipedia in a range of articles providing people with up to date information, especially within Australian articles; so clearly there is an intent to “build an encyclopaedia.” I gathered three of my friends, all of which have brilliant encyclopaedic knowledge, to join Wikipedia and help contribute. I showed them the user page to help them get started on the Wiki. It would’ve been nice for me and for my friends (the other accounts were my friends’, not my own) to receive some sort of warning before you proceeded to shut down our accounts. If there was simply a friendly, detailed warning, especially as this is a first, minor misdemeanour, in the talk page of our user pages, we would have happily scaled back what we were doing on our pages, in fact, we would’ve moved away from Wikipedia entirely, along with the information on our user pages. Additionally, I have had this page for about 2 years and not one user seems to have a problem with it. Please reconsider your decision and provide us first with a warning, and time to rectify, before you decide to take such harsh action again. Balacachini (talk) 23:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I concur that it's hard to think you are all different people, but even if you are, it's still meatpuppetry. Contacting them means little, as we don't know who is sitting at the computer operating the accounts. You don't describe what constructive edits you wish to make, and seem to be suggesting you aren't returning, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For reference, the other accounts in question are Terrance45, Franp Cappuccino, and Ava Canada. Based on the deleted userpages (one of which I had to oversight) I find it extremely hard to believe these are all different people. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to contact them directly? I have their contact details if you’d like. You have no evidence to say that these accounts are run by one person. I can get them to contact you. Balacachini (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean seriously, I've done nothing wrong, we've done nothing wrong. I haven't hurt anyone, I haven't abused anyone, haven't harassed anyone, nothing, and neither have my friends. We've just minded my own business, making additions where we can. There was, quite frankly, no need to shut down our accounts. In fact, you have only just lost yourselves valuable editors from the Australian community. Your actions are completely unnecessary and time consuming. Balacachini (talk) 03:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]