User talk:Balablitz/Archive 16

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Balablitz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

→

Wiki Loves Indian defence services

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.

A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Best Feature Film National Film Award winners

As explained in this description, I think it should only include those films that won in the category Best Feature Film, not it's regional variants. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Mea culpa. Since the description didn't mention about non-inclusion of regional films, i assumed and made changes. Hope the same information can be left there to avoid errors or confusion in future.

Thank you very much! for notifying me. I had reverted my edits. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 09:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DJ film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DJ film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Filmibeat

Hi Balablitz, hope all is well with you. Re: this, though Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source per WP:ICTF, I've been looking the other way when it pertains to relatively uncontroversial claims, like someone being cast in a film, or a release date, or something like that. I'm not saying that you have to do anything differently--if you prefer not to use Filmibeat at all, that's a reasonable position given the community consensus, but I feel if we were to adhere to the letter of the law, it would be much harder to find sources for stuff like casting. Just a thought. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Raj Kumar actor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raj Kumar actor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Smaller Rly Stns

Does every small railway station deserve an article?--Vin09 (talk) 07:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Vin09: Small or Big, notability takes cue. Please see WP:RAILOUTCOMES, WP:STATION and some of the AFD's of Gdynia Redłowo railway station, Mohe Railway Station, Fatih railway station, Legionowo railway station, etc., FYI, unaware of guidelines, many new and even some experienced editors create railway stations quoting some travel blogs and sites including www.indiarailinfo.com, which is a user generated content that cannot be considered as reliable source rather that it suits for external link section only. If you are familiar with the indiarailinfo.com website, every train page has "Train News" section and station page has "News" section, which contain relevant information regarding the page or subject that mostly pass reliable sources guidelines. But many fail to notice this while looking for sources. Please leave your opinion if u agree or disagree. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 23:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I completely agree.--Vin09 (talk) 02:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

EW ticket opened

FYI - I opened a ticket on EW/N Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jagadeesh T reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: ) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thanks for Improving articles on Indian Railways Feroze Ahmad 2 (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Tagging of Proposed Rourkela railway division

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Proposed Rourkela railway division. I do not think that Proposed Rourkela railway division fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because As there is reliable source coverage of this, it is not "made up". I request that you consider not re-tagging Proposed Rourkela railway division for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)