User talk:Bakermannn

Neville Southall

Hello! Just informing if you can help, that Neville Southall has definitely made at least 1,000 official appearances, if numbers prior to Bury are found. P.S. I know I have addressed this before, but it's a repetition in case new data came to light. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Nenê

Hello! I am looking for a source for 59 matches (25 goals) for Al-Gharafa; I have him on the list with 53 matches (22 goals) from SoccerWay, but I see he has 59 (25 goals) in his WP bio-article career's section. Perhaps you have/know a reliable source for a total of 59 matches? Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I know he has 55 on FDB and I will add it soon: by the way, in case you didn't notice, I have moved the list to my sandbox' talk and I update it there because I got fed up with Kesha and admins' ignorance; first they moved the reserves and war-time matches three years earlier, even though RSSSF has these matches as official because war-time matches were official ones when they were played, but I managed without them, as described in the intro, meaning made so to be fair to the rest without them, even though having Barcelona B, Real Madrid C teams, et c. isn't that fair, then they removed FDB and some days ago oGol, per WP:WPFLINKSNO, which collapses the whole article since it's one of the main DBs to the majority of players who have oGol as a source, and the article is going to a direction I don't support at all; as you can see, they already have changed it now to 48 players instead of 56, but, since I have moved it to sandbox and to whoever wishes to find true statistics regardless of name, fame and profit, I will of course soon re-add FDB. And it is ridiculous because FDB, oGol and its mirror sites are not user-generated at all like WP is; yes, one can add stats, but they pass from a reviewer who checks the validity of the source provided with the stat; if there is no source or not good enough source, it doesn't get published. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 06:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Maybe it was 30 matches for Palmeiras, but 31 as a total is not only coming from oGol, but also from Globo's and Juventude's official website sources, and I must say it's obvious both the latter have drawn their stats from oGol, nonetheless 31 as a total is well-sourced. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello! First, thanks for your support, it means a lot to me. Secondly, I have changed it for Palmeiras with a note that explains why it's 30 and not 31. Finally, on another topic, do you have any source(s) for matches for Brazil U20? I don't know if he played in any match as in RSSSF Brasil, direct link here, he doesn't appear to be in any of the selections. Could be that Juventude took it from WP and there is a confusion with some other player. P.S. In addition, there isn't a 11v11 profile for this player, or at least I couldn't find one, as 11v11 is always complete for national teams' numbers, wonder why there isn't one, it's weird, especially because he also passed once from England (8 matches for West Ham United). Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 07:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

František Plánička

Hello! Just a note so you can realize how wrong the direction the article and football editors in WP have taken is; one of the 7 players they have removed (7 and not 8 because I hadn't added Nenê then, when they took over), which I can easily tell, is František Plánička, whom Bleacher Report not only has with 969 matches for Slavia Prague in total, but with 989 only the league matches for the club (see direct link here), and remember I have a note about 1,100+ matches in total for Slavia Prague, i.e. he could even have 1,300+ matches in total in the list, with the appropriate sources. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 16:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Updating the list

Hello! I will keep updating the sandbox as I want to keep the super list (including youth internationals and other matches that were removed), but, seeing the list does not get updated, I would like to add that you are free to update it, and you can also use the sandbox, i.e. only parts that can be included, if you wish, which will stay updated. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 11:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I am informing I have made another list with the differences in the criteria specified, and hopefully this will stay alive. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 10:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)