User talk:Bajaria
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Bajaria! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Kumquat, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ZZZ'S 16:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aardman Animations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2024 in Israel, you may be blocked from editing. 【💬】 02:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. —Cryptic 07:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Final warning
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at California gold rush. Opolito (talk) 01:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Bajaria! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
I see you've already received the standard CTOP notice several days ago, so consider this a final warning of sorts: you are not extended-confirmed, and therefore you not allowed to edit in the topic area. The Kip (contribs) 07:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Bajaria. Thank you. The Kip (contribs) 20:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Hello, I'm Xaloria. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Xaloria (talk) 09:56, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion - 2
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Bajaria - 2. Thank you. The Kip (contribs) 21:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024 - 2
[edit]If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Edit summaries
[edit]I just wanted to note that you should be using edit summaries. In your settings, you can check "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary)" so that you have a reminder. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 04:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- The Source (retailer)
- added links pointing to Battery, Bose, Home entertainment and Headrush
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]Hello, please do not create talk pages with just the {{Disambig project}} tag, as this contravenes the template's documentation; I have deleted those pages. Your edit to Pope Leo XIII was not helpful either as it fixed a redirect that isn't broken. I revertted your edit to Goblin (film) as IMDB is generally not a reliable source here. I'm honestly extremely close to blocking you indefinitely for general disruptive editing as you've already been blocked twice in your short wiki-career (under this account); the only thing that stops me at this point is that you did *try* to add a source to the Goblin article, presumably in response to the warning above, even though it wasn't a terribly good reference. Graham87 (talk) 07:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graham87 (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
I have decided to block you after all, after this revert by Epipelagic to your edit to Fish as food. Wikipedia does not need timewasters like you. Graham87 (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]Deletion discussion about Tobacco Tax Act
[edit]Hello, Bajaria
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Tobacco Tax Act, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Tobacco Tax Act.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-1ctinus📝🗨 17:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
"Neo-moors" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Neo-moors has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 27 § Neo-moors until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 01:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
"Neo-mooris" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Neo-mooris has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 27 § Neo-mooris until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (u — c) 01:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)