User talk:Bade123

April 2017

Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Otolorin Olabode

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Otolorin Olabode. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the template will not stop the AfD discussion about the article. The template will be removed by the administrator who closes the discussion. If you feel the article should not be deleted, then read my reply to you at Talk:Otolorin Olabode. This is your second warning about removing the template. The Wikipedia community understands that new editors make mistakes and will be patient as long as they do not keep repeating them. If you continue to remove the template before the discussion has been closed, an administrator will be asked to intervene to prevent any further disruption. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Bade123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Otolorin Olabode, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 10:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Otolorin123, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Marchjuly (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]